Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "جدلية الخلق والتطور" in Arabic language version.
Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called 'flaws' in the theory of evolution or 'disagreements' within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific 'alternatives' to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to 'critically analyze' evolution or to understand 'the controversy.' But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one.
{{استشهاد بخطاب}}
: الوسيط غير المعروف |عنوان المؤتمر=
تم تجاهله (مساعدة){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link)That this controversy is one largely manufactured by the proponents of creationism and intelligent design may not matter, and as long as the controversy is taught in classes on current affairs, politics, or religion, and not in science classes, neither scientists nor citizens should be concerned.
{{استشهاد بدورية محكمة}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link) نسخة محفوظة 6 يوليو 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link)That this controversy is one largely manufactured by the proponents of creationism and intelligent design may not matter, and as long as the controversy is taught in classes on current affairs, politics, or religion, and not in science classes, neither scientists nor citizens should be concerned.
{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link){{استشهاد بدورية محكمة}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link) نسخة محفوظة 6 يوليو 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link)Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called 'flaws' in the theory of evolution or 'disagreements' within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific 'alternatives' to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to 'critically analyze' evolution or to understand 'the controversy.' But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one.
{{استشهاد بخطاب}}
: الوسيط غير المعروف |عنوان المؤتمر=
تم تجاهله (مساعدة){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link){{استشهاد بدورية محكمة}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link) نسخة محفوظة 6 يوليو 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link){{استشهاد بدورية محكمة}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: علامات ترقيم زائدة (link) نسخة محفوظة 6 يوليو 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.That this controversy is one largely manufactured by the proponents of creationism and intelligent design may not matter, and as long as the controversy is taught in classes on current affairs, politics, or religion, and not in science classes, neither scientists nor citizens should be concerned.