دستورانية (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "دستورانية" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Arabic rank

27web.archive.org

1^st place

7archive.org

6^th place

3^rd place

3constitution.org

7,036^th place

low place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

4^th place

2openlibrary.org

325^th place

30^th place

2wikidata.org

43^rd place

2^nd place

2virginia.edu

1,041^st place

1,020^th place

2bepress.com

7,958^th place

low place

2mpil.de

low place

1stanford.edu

179^th place

237^th place

1utexas.edu

916^th place

711^th place

1gale.com

1,435^th place

511^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

8^th place

1fordham.edu

1,648^th place

1,437^th place

1questia.com

1,201^st place

3,646^th place

1oyez.org

8,598^th place

low place

1landmarkcases.org

low place

1mtsu.edu

low place

6,358^th place

1californiamuseum.org

low place

1latimes.com

22^nd place

111^th place

1jstor.org

26^th place

31^st place

1core.ac.uk

1,734^th place

5,281^st place

1kantei.go.jp

2,533^rd place

low place

1archive.today

14^th place

41^st place

1doi.org

2^nd place

5^th place

1metapress.com

8,671^st place

3,277^th place

archive.org

منير البعلبكي؛ رمزي البعلبكي (2008). المورد الحديث: قاموس إنكليزي عربي (بالعربية والإنجليزية) (ط. 1). بيروت: دار العلم للملايين. ص. 264. ISBN:978-9953-63-541-5. OCLC:405515532. OL:50197876M. QID:Q112315598.
أحمد سعيفان (2004). قاموس المصطلحات السياسية والدستورية و الدولية: عربي - إنكليزي - فرنسي (بالعربية والإنجليزية والفرنسية) (ط. 1). بيروت: مكتبة لبنان ناشرون. ص. 176. ISBN:978-9953-33-434-9. OCLC:58417609. OL:19653457M. QID:Q116895717.
Gordon، Scott (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. ص. 4. ISBN:0-674-16987-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2022-04-27.
Gordon، Scott (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. ص. 5, 223–83, 327–57. ISBN:0-674-16987-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-08-02.
Gordon، Scott (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. ص. 5, 223–83, 327–57. ISBN:0-674-16987-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2022-04-27.
Bagehot، Walter (1867). The English Constitution. Chapman and Hall. ص. 2, 348. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-12-06. (Bagehot noted his intent to correct mistaken views of the British constitution, including whether the constitution was "laid down as a principle of the English polity, that in it the legislative, the executive, and the judicial powers, are quite divided....")
Davies، Norman (1996). Europe: A History. Oxford University Press. ص. 699. ISBN:0-19-820171-0. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-23.

archive.today

Rohac، Dalibor (يونيو 2008). "The unanimity rule and religious fractionalisation in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic". Constitutional Political Economy. Springer. ج. 19 ع. 2: 111–28. DOI:10.1007/s10602-008-9037-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2012-12-17. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2009-05-18.

bepress.com

works.bepress.com

For the assumptions by historians, political scientists and lawyers that have contributed to a view of constitutionalism essentially connected and confined to the US Constitution, see Christian G. Fritz, "Fallacies of American Constitutionalism نسخة محفوظة 2011-05-11 على موقع واي باك مشين. ," 35 Rutgers Law Journal (2004), 1327–69. See also Christian G. Fritz, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 2008). p. 284 ("Invariably, the state constitutional tradition is deemed less authentic because of its departure from the federal model. This has led to the assumption that one need only study the federal Constitution to discover what American constitutionalism was then and is today.") (ردمك 978-0-521-88188-3). ^{[وصلة مكسورة]}
For the assumptions by historians, political scientists and lawyers that have contributed to a view of constitutionalism essentially connected and confined to the US Constitution, see Christian G. Fritz, "Fallacies of American Constitutionalism نسخة محفوظة 2011-05-11 على موقع واي باك مشين. ," 35 Rutgers Law Journal (2004), 1327–69. See also Christian G. Fritz, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 2008). p. 284 ("Invariably, the state constitutional tradition is deemed less authentic because of its departure from the federal model. This has led to the assumption that one need only study the federal Constitution to discover what American constitutionalism was then and is today.") (ردمك 978-0-521-88188-3).

books.google.com

Bagehot، Walter (1867). The English Constitution. Chapman and Hall. ص. 2, 348. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-01-24. {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة) (Bagehot noted his intent to correct mistaken views of the British constitution, including whether the constitution was "laid down as a principle of the English polity, that in it the legislative, the executive, and the judicial powers, are quite divided....")

californiamuseum.org

"Earl Warren". California Museum (بالإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2021-09-10. Retrieved 2019-09-01.

constitution.org

Herman Belz, "A Living Constitution or Fundamental Law? American Constitutionalism in Historical Perspective" نسخة محفوظة 2008-12-02 على موقع واي باك مشين. (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 1998) at pp. 148–49 (Belz further argues: "Constitutionalism shapes political life in a variety of ways. Constitutional principles can become matters of commitment and belief possessing intrinsic value that motivate political action.... When citizens and governing officials internalize constitutional values, acting out of fidelity to law rather than expediency, constitutionalism gives direction to political life. Constitutionalism has a configurative effect also in providing the forms, rhetoric, and symbols by which politics is carried on. Political groups and individuals ordinarily try to choose courses of action that are consistent with or required by the Constitution. They do so not because they are in each instance committed to the constitutional principle or value at issue... [but] because they know that the public takes the Constitution seriously, believing that it embodies fundamental values and formal procedures that are the touchstone of political legitimacy. In American politics the Constitution is a justifying concept, and groups that invoke constitutional arguments do so, from their own perspective perhaps and in an immediate sense, instrumentally. Considered from an external and long-range view in relation to the polity as a whole, however, reliance on constitutional principles and rules is normative and noninstrumental. In this way constitutionalism shapes political events") (ردمك 978-0-8476-8643-8).
James Madison, in his remarks introducing the Bill of Rights, 8 June 1789, Annals 1:424–50. Link نسخة محفوظة 2009-05-04 على موقع واي باك مشين.
James Madison, in his remarks introducing the Bill of Rights, 8 June 1789, Annals 1:424–50. Link نسخة محفوظة 2009-05-04 على موقع واي باك مشين.

core.ac.uk

Swindler، William F. (1970). "The Warren Court: Completion of a Constitutional Revolution" (PDF). Vanderbilt Law Review. ج. 23. مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2019-10-03. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-21.

doi.org

Rohac، Dalibor (يونيو 2008). "The unanimity rule and religious fractionalisation in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic". Constitutional Political Economy. Springer. ج. 19 ع. 2: 111–28. DOI:10.1007/s10602-008-9037-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2012-12-17. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2009-05-18.

fordham.edu

law.fordham.edu

Louis Michael Seidman, "Critical Constitutionalism Now" نسخة محفوظة 2008-09-10 على موقع واي باك مشين., 75 Fordham Law Review pp. 575, 586 (Nov. 2006). ^{[وصلة مكسورة]}

gale.com

Stephen M. Griffin, "American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics" نسخة محفوظة 2011-08-12 على موقع واي باك مشين. (Princeton University Press, 1996). p. 5. (ردمك 978-0-691-03404-1).

jstor.org

Driver، Justin (أكتوبر 2012). "The Constitutional Conservatism of the Warren Court". California Law Review. ج. 100 ع. 5: 1101–1167. JSTOR:23408735.

kantei.go.jp

japan.kantei.go.jp

"THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN". japan.kantei.go.jp. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-15. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-21.

landmarkcases.org

landmarkcases.dcwdbeta.com، Landmark Supreme Court Cases (555) 123-4567. "Landmark Supreme Court Cases | Cases - Marbury v. Madison". Landmark Supreme Court Cases. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-02-23. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-21.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: أسماء عددية: قائمة المؤلفين (link)

latimes.com

"From the Archives: Earl Warren Dies at 83; Chief Justice for 16 Years". Los Angeles Times (بالإنجليزية الأمريكية). 10 Jul 1974. Archived from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2019-10-06.

metapress.com

commerce.metapress.com

Rohac، Dalibor (يونيو 2008). "The unanimity rule and religious fractionalisation in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic". Constitutional Political Economy. Springer. ج. 19 ع. 2: 111–28. DOI:10.1007/s10602-008-9037-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2012-12-17. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2009-05-18.

mpil.de

See, e.g. the monitoring project "Constitutional Reform in Arab Countries" (archived from the original on October 19, 2011)
See, e.g. the monitoring project "Constitutional Reform in Arab Countries", http://www.mpil.de/red/crac^{[وصلة مكسورة]}. نسخة محفوظة 8 مارس 2021 على موقع واي باك مشين.

mtsu.edu

Pederson, William D. "Earl Warren". www.mtsu.edu (بالإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2021-09-10. Retrieved 2019-09-15.

openlibrary.org

منير البعلبكي؛ رمزي البعلبكي (2008). المورد الحديث: قاموس إنكليزي عربي (بالعربية والإنجليزية) (ط. 1). بيروت: دار العلم للملايين. ص. 264. ISBN:978-9953-63-541-5. OCLC:405515532. OL:50197876M. QID:Q112315598.
أحمد سعيفان (2004). قاموس المصطلحات السياسية والدستورية و الدولية: عربي - إنكليزي - فرنسي (بالعربية والإنجليزية والفرنسية) (ط. 1). بيروت: مكتبة لبنان ناشرون. ص. 176. ISBN:978-9953-33-434-9. OCLC:58417609. OL:19653457M. QID:Q116895717.

oyez.org

"Marbury v. Madison". Oyez (بالإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2021-08-09. Retrieved 2019-10-21.

questia.com

Stephen M. Griffin, "American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics" نسخة محفوظة 2011-08-12 على موقع واي باك مشين. (Princeton University Press, 1996). p. 5. (ردمك 978-0-691-03404-1).

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Wil Waluchow "Constitutionalism" (Intro Jan. 2001 (revised Feb. 20, 2007). نسخة محفوظة 22 أبريل 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.

utexas.edu

laits.utexas.edu

"Model State Constitution" (PDF). utexas.edu. مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2013-02-26. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2018-05-02.

virginia.edu

etext.lib.virginia.edu

Philip P. Wiener, ed., "Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas" نسخة محفوظة 2006-06-23 على موقع واي باك مشين., (David Fellman, "Constitutionalism"), vol 1, pp. 485, 491–92 (1973–74) ("Whatever particular form of government a constitution delineates, however, it serves as the keystone of the arch of constitutionalism, except in those countries whose written constitutions are mere sham. Constitutionalism as a theory and in practice stands for the principle that there are—in a properly governed state—limitations upon those who exercise the powers of government, and that these limitations are spelled out in a body of higher law which is enforceable in a variety of ways, political and judicial. This is by no means a modern idea, for the concept of a higher law which spells out the basic norms of a political society is as old as Western civilization. That there are standards of rightness which transcend and control public officials, even current popular majorities, represents a critically significant element of man's endless quest for the good life.")
Philip P. Wiener, ed., "Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas", (David Fellman, "Constitutionalism") نسخة محفوظة 2006-06-23 على موقع واي باك مشين., vol 1, p. 485 (1973–74).

web.archive.org

Gordon، Scott (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. ص. 4. ISBN:0-674-16987-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2022-04-27.
Philip P. Wiener, ed., "Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas" نسخة محفوظة 2006-06-23 على موقع واي باك مشين., (David Fellman, "Constitutionalism"), vol 1, pp. 485, 491–92 (1973–74) ("Whatever particular form of government a constitution delineates, however, it serves as the keystone of the arch of constitutionalism, except in those countries whose written constitutions are mere sham. Constitutionalism as a theory and in practice stands for the principle that there are—in a properly governed state—limitations upon those who exercise the powers of government, and that these limitations are spelled out in a body of higher law which is enforceable in a variety of ways, political and judicial. This is by no means a modern idea, for the concept of a higher law which spells out the basic norms of a political society is as old as Western civilization. That there are standards of rightness which transcend and control public officials, even current popular majorities, represents a critically significant element of man's endless quest for the good life.")
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Wil Waluchow "Constitutionalism" (Intro Jan. 2001 (revised Feb. 20, 2007). نسخة محفوظة 22 أبريل 2018 على موقع واي باك مشين.
"Model State Constitution" (PDF). utexas.edu. مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2013-02-26. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2018-05-02.
Stephen M. Griffin, "American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics" نسخة محفوظة 2011-08-12 على موقع واي باك مشين. (Princeton University Press, 1996). p. 5. (ردمك 978-0-691-03404-1).
For the assumptions by historians, political scientists and lawyers that have contributed to a view of constitutionalism essentially connected and confined to the US Constitution, see Christian G. Fritz, "Fallacies of American Constitutionalism نسخة محفوظة 2011-05-11 على موقع واي باك مشين. ," 35 Rutgers Law Journal (2004), 1327–69. See also Christian G. Fritz, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 2008). p. 284 ("Invariably, the state constitutional tradition is deemed less authentic because of its departure from the federal model. This has led to the assumption that one need only study the federal Constitution to discover what American constitutionalism was then and is today.") (ردمك 978-0-521-88188-3). ^{[وصلة مكسورة]}
Gordon، Scott (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. ص. 5, 223–83, 327–57. ISBN:0-674-16987-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-08-02.
Bagehot، Walter (1867). The English Constitution. Chapman and Hall. ص. 2, 348. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-01-24. {{استشهاد بكتاب}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch (مساعدة) (Bagehot noted his intent to correct mistaken views of the British constitution, including whether the constitution was "laid down as a principle of the English polity, that in it the legislative, the executive, and the judicial powers, are quite divided....")
Philip P. Wiener, ed., "Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas", (David Fellman, "Constitutionalism") نسخة محفوظة 2006-06-23 على موقع واي باك مشين., vol 1, p. 485 (1973–74).
Herman Belz, "A Living Constitution or Fundamental Law? American Constitutionalism in Historical Perspective" نسخة محفوظة 2008-12-02 على موقع واي باك مشين. (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. 1998) at pp. 148–49 (Belz further argues: "Constitutionalism shapes political life in a variety of ways. Constitutional principles can become matters of commitment and belief possessing intrinsic value that motivate political action.... When citizens and governing officials internalize constitutional values, acting out of fidelity to law rather than expediency, constitutionalism gives direction to political life. Constitutionalism has a configurative effect also in providing the forms, rhetoric, and symbols by which politics is carried on. Political groups and individuals ordinarily try to choose courses of action that are consistent with or required by the Constitution. They do so not because they are in each instance committed to the constitutional principle or value at issue... [but] because they know that the public takes the Constitution seriously, believing that it embodies fundamental values and formal procedures that are the touchstone of political legitimacy. In American politics the Constitution is a justifying concept, and groups that invoke constitutional arguments do so, from their own perspective perhaps and in an immediate sense, instrumentally. Considered from an external and long-range view in relation to the polity as a whole, however, reliance on constitutional principles and rules is normative and noninstrumental. In this way constitutionalism shapes political events") (ردمك 978-0-8476-8643-8).
Louis Michael Seidman, "Critical Constitutionalism Now" نسخة محفوظة 2008-09-10 على موقع واي باك مشين., 75 Fordham Law Review pp. 575, 586 (Nov. 2006). ^{[وصلة مكسورة]}
James Madison, in his remarks introducing the Bill of Rights, 8 June 1789, Annals 1:424–50. Link نسخة محفوظة 2009-05-04 على موقع واي باك مشين.
Stephen M. Griffin, "American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics" نسخة محفوظة 2011-08-12 على موقع واي باك مشين. (Princeton University Press, 1996). p. 5. (ردمك 978-0-691-03404-1).
For the assumptions by historians, political scientists and lawyers that have contributed to a view of constitutionalism essentially connected and confined to the US Constitution, see Christian G. Fritz, "Fallacies of American Constitutionalism نسخة محفوظة 2011-05-11 على موقع واي باك مشين. ," 35 Rutgers Law Journal (2004), 1327–69. See also Christian G. Fritz, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 2008). p. 284 ("Invariably, the state constitutional tradition is deemed less authentic because of its departure from the federal model. This has led to the assumption that one need only study the federal Constitution to discover what American constitutionalism was then and is today.") (ردمك 978-0-521-88188-3).
James Madison, in his remarks introducing the Bill of Rights, 8 June 1789, Annals 1:424–50. Link نسخة محفوظة 2009-05-04 على موقع واي باك مشين.
"Marbury v. Madison". Oyez (بالإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2021-08-09. Retrieved 2019-10-21.
landmarkcases.dcwdbeta.com، Landmark Supreme Court Cases (555) 123-4567. "Landmark Supreme Court Cases | Cases - Marbury v. Madison". Landmark Supreme Court Cases. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-02-23. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-21.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: أسماء عددية: قائمة المؤلفين (link)
Pederson, William D. "Earl Warren". www.mtsu.edu (بالإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2021-09-10. Retrieved 2019-09-15.
"Earl Warren". California Museum (بالإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2021-09-10. Retrieved 2019-09-01.
"From the Archives: Earl Warren Dies at 83; Chief Justice for 16 Years". Los Angeles Times (بالإنجليزية الأمريكية). 10 Jul 1974. Archived from the original on 2021-09-17. Retrieved 2019-10-06.
Swindler، William F. (1970). "The Warren Court: Completion of a Constitutional Revolution" (PDF). Vanderbilt Law Review. ج. 23. مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2019-10-03. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-21.
Gordon، Scott (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. ص. 5, 223–83, 327–57. ISBN:0-674-16987-5. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2022-04-27.
Bagehot، Walter (1867). The English Constitution. Chapman and Hall. ص. 2, 348. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-12-06. (Bagehot noted his intent to correct mistaken views of the British constitution, including whether the constitution was "laid down as a principle of the English polity, that in it the legislative, the executive, and the judicial powers, are quite divided....")
"THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN". japan.kantei.go.jp. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-15. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-10-21.
Davies، Norman (1996). Europe: A History. Oxford University Press. ص. 699. ISBN:0-19-820171-0. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2021-09-23.
See, e.g. the monitoring project "Constitutional Reform in Arab Countries" (archived from the original on October 19, 2011)
See, e.g. the monitoring project "Constitutional Reform in Arab Countries", http://www.mpil.de/red/crac^{[وصلة مكسورة]}. نسخة محفوظة 8 مارس 2021 على موقع واي باك مشين.

wikidata.org

منير البعلبكي؛ رمزي البعلبكي (2008). المورد الحديث: قاموس إنكليزي عربي (بالعربية والإنجليزية) (ط. 1). بيروت: دار العلم للملايين. ص. 264. ISBN:978-9953-63-541-5. OCLC:405515532. OL:50197876M. QID:Q112315598.
أحمد سعيفان (2004). قاموس المصطلحات السياسية والدستورية و الدولية: عربي - إنكليزي - فرنسي (بالعربية والإنجليزية والفرنسية) (ط. 1). بيروت: مكتبة لبنان ناشرون. ص. 176. ISBN:978-9953-33-434-9. OCLC:58417609. OL:19653457M. QID:Q116895717.

worldcat.org

منير البعلبكي؛ رمزي البعلبكي (2008). المورد الحديث: قاموس إنكليزي عربي (بالعربية والإنجليزية) (ط. 1). بيروت: دار العلم للملايين. ص. 264. ISBN:978-9953-63-541-5. OCLC:405515532. OL:50197876M. QID:Q112315598.
أحمد سعيفان (2004). قاموس المصطلحات السياسية والدستورية و الدولية: عربي - إنكليزي - فرنسي (بالعربية والإنجليزية والفرنسية) (ط. 1). بيروت: مكتبة لبنان ناشرون. ص. 176. ISBN:978-9953-33-434-9. OCLC:58417609. OL:19653457M. QID:Q116895717.