Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "سبيس إكس" in Arabic language version.
{{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: الأرشيف كعنوان (link){{استشهاد ويب}}
: |الأخير=
باسم عام (مساعدة)صيانة الاستشهاد: أسماء متعددة: قائمة المؤلفين (link)the key technical finding by the IRT with regard to this failure was that it was due to a design error: SpaceX chose to use an industrial grade (as opposed to aerospace grade) 17-4 PH SS (precipitation-hardening stainless steel) cast part (the "Rod End") in a critical load path under cryogenic conditions and strenuous flight environments. The implementation was done without adequate screening or testing of the industrial grade part, without regard to the manufacturer's recommendations for a 4:1 factor of safety when using their industrial grade part in an application, and without proper modeling or adequate load testing of the part under predicted flight conditions. This design error is directly related to the Falcon 9 CRS-7 launch failure as a "credible" cause
Mr. Musk, however, has a history of overly optimistic predictions. In Guadalajara in 2016, for example, he said the aim was to send the first cargo flight to Mars in 2022 and the first people there two years later. Those dates are unlikely to be met.
{{استشهاد ويب}}
: تحقق من التاريخ في: |تاريخ=
(مساعدة) و|الأول=
باسم عام (مساعدة){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)When the Boring Co. was earlier this year spun into its own firm, more than 90% of the equity went to Mr. Musk and the rest to early employees... The Boring Co. has since given some equity to SpaceX as compensation for the help... about 6% of Boring stock, "based on the value of land, time and other resources contributed since the creation of the company".
Mr. Musk, however, has a history of overly optimistic predictions. In Guadalajara in 2016, for example, he said the aim was to send the first cargo flight to Mars in 2022 and the first people there two years later. Those dates are unlikely to be met.
the key technical finding by the IRT with regard to this failure was that it was due to a design error: SpaceX chose to use an industrial grade (as opposed to aerospace grade) 17-4 PH SS (precipitation-hardening stainless steel) cast part (the "Rod End") in a critical load path under cryogenic conditions and strenuous flight environments. The implementation was done without adequate screening or testing of the industrial grade part, without regard to the manufacturer's recommendations for a 4:1 factor of safety when using their industrial grade part in an application, and without proper modeling or adequate load testing of the part under predicted flight conditions. This design error is directly related to the Falcon 9 CRS-7 launch failure as a "credible" cause
{{استشهاد ويب}}
: |الأخير=
باسم عام (مساعدة)صيانة الاستشهاد: أسماء متعددة: قائمة المؤلفين (link){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link){{استشهاد ويب}}
: تحقق من التاريخ في: |تاريخ=
(مساعدة) و|الأول=
باسم عام (مساعدة){{استشهاد ويب}}
: صيانة الاستشهاد: الأرشيف كعنوان (link)When the Boring Co. was earlier this year spun into its own firm, more than 90% of the equity went to Mr. Musk and the rest to early employees... The Boring Co. has since given some equity to SpaceX as compensation for the help... about 6% of Boring stock, "based on the value of land, time and other resources contributed since the creation of the company".