Feliks, Yehuda (1986), pp. 454–455, who puts the Jerusalem Talmud's redaction no later than the end of the 3rd century CE, and the making of the mosaic immediately thereafter; Sussmann, Jacob (1975). Jewish legal inscription from a synagogue, p. 124. متحف إسرائيل, Jerusalem. Retrieved on 2019-07-15 from https://www.imj.org.il/en/collections/395953. نسخة محفوظة 2019-03-28 على موقع واي باك مشين.
The actual archaeological site was located ca. 800 متر (2,600 قدم) northwest of Tel Rehov. See Vitto, Fanny (2015), p. 10, note 2. نسخة محفوظة 1 أغسطس 2019 على موقع واي باك مشين.
mechon-mamre.org
As argued by Ishtori Haparchi (2007), pp. 40, 42. Although راشي in تلمودHullin 6b (s.v. את בית שאן כולה) says that Beit She'an was not part of the Land of Israel, Ishtori Haparchi argues that the sense here is to places not captured by the Returnees from Babylon, although they were conquered by Joshua, and which places have only the technical name of "outside the Land of Israel," just as we see with عكا in BT Gittin 76b. Likewise, Beit She'an was subdued by Israel during the time of Joshua, forcing its inhabitants to pay tribute unto Israel (تلمودHullin 7a on Judges 1:27–28), but was not taken by the Returnees from Babylon. نسخة محفوظة 16 مايو 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين.
web.archive.org
Feliks, Yehuda (1986), pp. 454–455, who puts the Jerusalem Talmud's redaction no later than the end of the 3rd century CE, and the making of the mosaic immediately thereafter; Sussmann, Jacob (1975). Jewish legal inscription from a synagogue, p. 124. متحف إسرائيل, Jerusalem. Retrieved on 2019-07-15 from https://www.imj.org.il/en/collections/395953. نسخة محفوظة 2019-03-28 على موقع واي باك مشين.
The actual archaeological site was located ca. 800 متر (2,600 قدم) northwest of Tel Rehov. See Vitto, Fanny (2015), p. 10, note 2. نسخة محفوظة 1 أغسطس 2019 على موقع واي باك مشين.
As argued by Ishtori Haparchi (2007), pp. 40, 42. Although راشي in تلمودHullin 6b (s.v. את בית שאן כולה) says that Beit She'an was not part of the Land of Israel, Ishtori Haparchi argues that the sense here is to places not captured by the Returnees from Babylon, although they were conquered by Joshua, and which places have only the technical name of "outside the Land of Israel," just as we see with عكا in BT Gittin 76b. Likewise, Beit She'an was subdued by Israel during the time of Joshua, forcing its inhabitants to pay tribute unto Israel (تلمودHullin 7a on Judges 1:27–28), but was not taken by the Returnees from Babylon. نسخة محفوظة 16 مايو 2017 على موقع واي باك مشين.
Safrai, Z.[لغات أخرى] (1977), p. 17 (note 91). The term "demai" is a Halakhic term meaning "dubious," referring to agricultural produce, the owner of which was not trusted with regard to the correct separation of the tithes assigned to the Levites, although the terumah (the part designated unto priests) was believed to have been separated from such fruits. In such "dubious" cases, all that was necessary was to separate the one-tenth portion[لغات أخرى] due to the priests from the First tithe given to the Levites, being the 1/100th part of the whole. The Second Tithe is also removed (redeemed) from the fruit in such cases of doubt.
