Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

كيمريسك (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "كيمريسك" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Arabic rank
8web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
1publicintegrity.org
low place
low place
1huffpost.com
378th place
333rd place
1nytimes.com
7th place
23rd place
1jhsph.edu
low place
low place
1researchgate.net
120th place
247th place
1jax.org
low place
low place
1doi.org
2nd place
5th place
1nih.gov
4th place
6th place
1cornell.edu
332nd place
400th place
1bizjournals.com
407th place
1,556th place

bizjournals.com

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

doi.org

  • Paustenbach، Dennis؛ Shu، F.J. (1986). "A Critical Examination of Assumptions Used in Risk Assessments of Dioxin Contaminated Soil". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. ج. 6 ع. 3: 284–307. DOI:10.1016/0273-2300(86)90019-X. PMID:3775086.

huffpost.com

jax.org

jhsph.edu

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Paustenbach، Dennis؛ Shu، F.J. (1986). "A Critical Examination of Assumptions Used in Risk Assessments of Dioxin Contaminated Soil". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. ج. 6 ع. 3: 284–307. DOI:10.1016/0273-2300(86)90019-X. PMID:3775086.

nytimes.com

publicintegrity.org

  • According to the February 18, 2016 article "Brokers of junk science?" which is part of their 2016 series entitled Science for Sale the مركز النزاهة العامة (CPI), critics also claim that Critical Reviews in Toxicology and Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology are "purveyors of junk science. CPI said they published "misleading, industry-backed articles that threaten public health by playing down the dangers of well-known toxic substances such as lead and asbestos. The articles often are used to stall regulatory efforts and defend court cases." "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-04-15. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-05-22.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)

researchgate.net

web.archive.org

  • According to the February 18, 2016 article "Brokers of junk science?" which is part of their 2016 series entitled Science for Sale the مركز النزاهة العامة (CPI), critics also claim that Critical Reviews in Toxicology and Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology are "purveyors of junk science. CPI said they published "misleading, industry-backed articles that threaten public health by playing down the dangers of well-known toxic substances such as lead and asbestos. The articles often are used to stall regulatory efforts and defend court cases." "نسخة مؤرشفة". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-04-15. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-05-22.{{استشهاد ويب}}: صيانة الاستشهاد: BOT: original URL status unknown (link)
  • Foytlin، Cherri (14 أكتوبر 2013). "ChemRisk, BP and Purple Strategies: A Tangled Web of Not-So-Independent Science". Huffington Post. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2017-03-22. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-04-13.
  • Meier، Barry (11 أكتوبر 2015). "Science Consultant Pushes Back Against Unlikely Opponents". The New York Times. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-05-22. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2016-04-13.
  • Cardno ChemRisk Recruiting Presentation (PDF)، مؤرشف من الأصل (PDF) في 2019-09-22، اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-09-22
  • "Dennis J Paustenbach's research while affiliated with Cardno ChemRisk and other places". Research Gate (بالإنجليزية). Archived from the original on 2019-09-22.
  • Teater، Barry. "Leaving a lasting imprint". The Jackson Laboratory. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-09-24. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-09-24.
  • Rehnquist (4 مارس 1996)، Hercules Incorporated, Et Al., Peti Tioners v. United States، مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-12-04، اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-09-23
  • "McLaren/Hart files voluntary Chapter 11 - Sacramento Business Journal". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2003-02-18. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-09-23.