Hesiod, Theogony326–327Arxiv surəti 16 aprel 2019 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. Who is meant as the mother is unclear, the problem arising from the ambiguous referent of the pronoun "she" in line 326 of the Theogony, see Clay, p.159, note 34
Pherecydes, fr. 7 Fowler = FGrHist 3 F 7 (Fowler, p. 278); Hošek, p. 678.
Hesiod, Theogony270-300Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. Though Herbert Jennings Rose says simply that it is "not clear which parents [for Echidna] are meant", Athanassakis, p. 44, says that Ceto and Phorcys are the "more likely candidates for parents". The problem arises from the ambiguous referent of the pronoun "she" in Theogony295Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. While some have read this "she" as referring to Callirhoe (e.g. Smith s.v. EchidnaArxiv surəti 2 noyabr 2021 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında; Morford, p. 162), according to Clay, p. 159 n. 32, "the modern scholarly consensus" reads Ceto, see for example Most, p. 27 n. 16Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında ("Probably Ceto"); Gantz, p. 22 ("Phorkys and Keto produce Echidna"); Caldwell, pp. 7, 46 lines 295–303 ("presumably Keto"); West, p. 249 line 295 ("probably Keto"); Grimal, s.v. Echidna ("Phorcys and Ceto").
Hesiod, Theogony270-300Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. Though Herbert Jennings Rose says simply that it is "not clear which parents [for Echidna] are meant", Athanassakis, p. 44, says that Ceto and Phorcys are the "more likely candidates for parents". The problem arises from the ambiguous referent of the pronoun "she" in Theogony295Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. While some have read this "she" as referring to Callirhoe (e.g. Smith s.v. EchidnaArxiv surəti 2 noyabr 2021 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında; Morford, p. 162), according to Clay, p. 159 n. 32, "the modern scholarly consensus" reads Ceto, see for example Most, p. 27 n. 16Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında ("Probably Ceto"); Gantz, p. 22 ("Phorkys and Keto produce Echidna"); Caldwell, pp. 7, 46 lines 295–303 ("presumably Keto"); West, p. 249 line 295 ("probably Keto"); Grimal, s.v. Echidna ("Phorcys and Ceto").
Hesiod, Theogony326–327Arxiv surəti 16 aprel 2019 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. Who is meant as the mother is unclear, the problem arising from the ambiguous referent of the pronoun "she" in line 326 of the Theogony, see Clay, p.159, note 34
"κῆτος"Arxiv surəti 12 yanvar 2023 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında in Liddell, Henry and Robert Scott. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. Revised by H.S. Jones and R. McKenzie. Ninth edition, with revised supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hesiod, Theogony270-300Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. Though Herbert Jennings Rose says simply that it is "not clear which parents [for Echidna] are meant", Athanassakis, p. 44, says that Ceto and Phorcys are the "more likely candidates for parents". The problem arises from the ambiguous referent of the pronoun "she" in Theogony295Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. While some have read this "she" as referring to Callirhoe (e.g. Smith s.v. EchidnaArxiv surəti 2 noyabr 2021 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında; Morford, p. 162), according to Clay, p. 159 n. 32, "the modern scholarly consensus" reads Ceto, see for example Most, p. 27 n. 16Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında ("Probably Ceto"); Gantz, p. 22 ("Phorkys and Keto produce Echidna"); Caldwell, pp. 7, 46 lines 295–303 ("presumably Keto"); West, p. 249 line 295 ("probably Keto"); Grimal, s.v. Echidna ("Phorcys and Ceto").
"κῆτος"Arxiv surəti 12 yanvar 2023 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında in Liddell, Henry and Robert Scott. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. Revised by H.S. Jones and R. McKenzie. Ninth edition, with revised supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hesiod, Theogony270-300Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. Though Herbert Jennings Rose says simply that it is "not clear which parents [for Echidna] are meant", Athanassakis, p. 44, says that Ceto and Phorcys are the "more likely candidates for parents". The problem arises from the ambiguous referent of the pronoun "she" in Theogony295Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. While some have read this "she" as referring to Callirhoe (e.g. Smith s.v. EchidnaArxiv surəti 2 noyabr 2021 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında; Morford, p. 162), according to Clay, p. 159 n. 32, "the modern scholarly consensus" reads Ceto, see for example Most, p. 27 n. 16Arxiv surəti 4 mart 2025 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında ("Probably Ceto"); Gantz, p. 22 ("Phorkys and Keto produce Echidna"); Caldwell, pp. 7, 46 lines 295–303 ("presumably Keto"); West, p. 249 line 295 ("probably Keto"); Grimal, s.v. Echidna ("Phorcys and Ceto").
Hesiod, Theogony326–327Arxiv surəti 16 aprel 2019 tarixindən Wayback Machine saytında. Who is meant as the mother is unclear, the problem arising from the ambiguous referent of the pronoun "she" in line 326 of the Theogony, see Clay, p.159, note 34