Невролингвистично програмиране (Bulgarian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Невролингвистично програмиране" in Bulgarian language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Bulgarian rank
4th place
36th place
1,220th place
725th place
222nd place
401st place
1st place
1st place
2nd place
7th place
8,396th place
low place
6th place
11th place
8,394th place
27th place
731st place
439th place
3,867th place
3,488th place
3,844th place
1,424th place

annualreviews.org

  • Gelso, C J; Fassinger, R E (1 January 1990). „Counseling Psychology: Theory and Research on Interventions“. Annual Review of Psychology. 41 (1): 355 – 386. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002035. PMID 2407174. Neurolinguistic programming, focused on such variables as sensory mode preference and use (e.g., Graunke & Roberts 1985) and predicate matching (e.g., Elich et al 1985; Mercier & Johnson 1984) had shown promise at the beginning of the decade, but after several years of conflicting and confusing results, Sharpley (1984, 1987) reviewed the research and concluded that there was little support for the assumptions of NLP. This research is now clearly on the decline, underscoring the value of thoughtful reviews and the publication of nonsupportive results in guiding empirical efforts.

apa.org

psycnet.apa.org

  • Sharpley, Christopher F. (1 January 1987). „Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103 – 107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103.
  • Sharpley, Christopher F. (1 January 1987). „Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103 – 107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103
  • See, for instance, the following: Sharpley, Christopher. F. (1984). „Predicate matching in NLP: a review of research on the preferred representational system“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 31 (2): 238 – 48. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.238. Sharpley, Christopher F. (1 January 1987). „Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103 – 107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. Heap. M., (1988) Neurolinguistic programming: An interim verdict Archived 15 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine. In M. Heap (Ed.) Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practices. London: Croom Helm, pp. 268 – 280. Druckman, Daniel; Swets, John A. (1988). „Enhancing human performance: Issues, theories, and techniques“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 1(2): 202 – 206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920010212. Druckman, Daniel (1 November 2004). „Be All That You Can Be: Enhancing Human Performance“. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 34 (11): 2234 – 2260. von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). „Selected alternative training techniques in HRD“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 8 (4): 281 – 294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). „Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?“. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0.

archive.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

  • Bergen Von и др. Selected alternative training techniques in HRD // Human Resource Development Quarterly 8 (4). 1997. DOI:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. с. 281 – 294.
  • Ashley Dowlen. NLP – help or hype? Investigating the uses of neuro-linguistic programming in management learning // Career Development International 1 (1). 1996. DOI:10.1108/13620439610111408. с. 27 – 34.

google.bg

books.google.bg

  • "Thyer, Bruce A.; Pignotti, Monica G. (15 May 2015). Science and Pseudoscience in Social Work Practice. Springer Publishing Company. pp. 56 – 57, 165 – 167. ISBN 978-0-8261-7769-8. As NLP became more popular, some research was conducted and reviews of such research have concluded that there is no scientific basis for its theories about representational systems and eye movements.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Gelso, C J; Fassinger, R E (1 January 1990). „Counseling Psychology: Theory and Research on Interventions“. Annual Review of Psychology. 41 (1): 355 – 386. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002035. PMID 2407174. Neurolinguistic programming, focused on such variables as sensory mode preference and use (e.g., Graunke & Roberts 1985) and predicate matching (e.g., Elich et al 1985; Mercier & Johnson 1984) had shown promise at the beginning of the decade, but after several years of conflicting and confusing results, Sharpley (1984, 1987) reviewed the research and concluded that there was little support for the assumptions of NLP. This research is now clearly on the decline, underscoring the value of thoughtful reviews and the publication of nonsupportive results in guiding empirical efforts.
  • See the following: • Einspruch, Eric L.; Forman, Bruce D. (1 January 1985). „Observations concerning research literature on neuro-linguistic programming“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 32 (4): 589 – 596. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.32.4.589. • Murray, Laura L. (30 May 2013). „Limited evidence that neurolinguistic programming improves health-related outcomes“. Evidence-Based Mental Health. 16 (3): 79. doi:10.1136/eb-2013-101355. PMID 23723409. • Sturt, Jackie; Ali, Saima; Robertson, Wendy; Metcalfe, David; Grove, Amy; Bourne, Claire; Bridle, Chris (November 2012). „Neurolinguistic programming: a systematic review of the effects on health outcomes“. British Journal of General Practice. 62 (604): e757–64. doi:10.3399/bjgp12X658287. PMC 3481516. PMID 23211179. • „Neuro-Linguistic Programming and Research“. • Tosey, P.; Mathison, J. (2010). „Exploring inner landscapes through psychophenomenology: The contribution of neuro-linguistic programming to innovations in researching first person experience“(PDF). Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management. 5: 63 – 82. doi:10.1108/17465641011042035.
  • See the following: Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). „Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?“. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. Carroll, RT (23 February 2009). „neuro-linguistic programming (NLP)“. The Skeptic's Dictionary. Beyerstein, B.L (1990). „Brainscams: Neuromythologies of the New Age“. International Journal of Mental Health. 19 (3): 27 – 36 (27). doi:10.1080/00207411.1990.11449169. Corballis, Michael C. (2012). „Chapter 13 Educational double-think“. In Della Sala, Sergio; Anderson, Mike (eds.). Neuroscience in Education:The good, the bad, and the ugly (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 225 – 6. ISBN 978-0-19-960049-6. The notion of hemisphericity is also incorporated into such cult activities as Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP).... In any event, NLP is a movement that is still going strong, but has little scientific credibility. Singer, Margaret, and Lalich, Janja (1997). Crazy Therapies. Jossey-Bass. (Eds.) Lilienfeld, S., Lynn, S., & Lohr, J. (2004). Science and Pseudo-science in Clinical Psychology. The Guilford Press. Della Sala, Sergio (2007). „Introduction: The myth of 10% and other Tall Tales about the mind and brain“. Tall Tales About the Mind and Brain: Separating Fact from Fiction (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. xx. ISBN 978-0-19-856876-6. William F. Williams, ed. (2000), Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience: From Alien Abductions to Zone Therapy, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, ISBN 978-1-57958-207-4. p. 235 Lum.C (2001). Scientific Thinking in Speech and Language Therapy. Psychology Press. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-8058-4029-2. Lilienfeld, Scott O.; Lohr, Jeffrey M.; Morier, Dean (1 July 2001). „The Teaching of Courses in the Science and Pseudoscience of Psychology: Useful Resources“. Teaching of Psychology. 28 (3): 182 – 191. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.1001.2558. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2803_03. Dunn D, Halonen J, Smith R (2008). Teaching Critical Thinking in Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-4051-7402-2. Harris, Lauren Julius (1988). „Chapter 8 Right-Brain Training: Some Reflections on the Application of Research on Cerebral Hemispheric Specialization to Education“. In Molfese, Dennis L.; Segalowitz, Sidney J. (eds.). Brain Lateralization in Children: Developmental Implications (1st ed.). New York: Guilford Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-0-89862-719-0. NLP began in 1975 and has quickly achieved cult status. For a description of the social influence tactics used by NLP and similar pseudoscientific therapies, see Devilly, Grant J. (1 June 2005). „Power Therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry“. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 39 (6): 437 – 445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644.
  • Norcross and colleagues (2006) found NLP to be given similar ratings as dolphin assisted therapy, equine therapy, psychosynthesis, scared straight programmes, and emotional freedom technique: Norcross, John C.; Koocher, Gerald P.; Garofalo, Ariele (1 January 2006). „Discredited psychological treatments and tests: A Delphi poll“. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 37 (5): 515 – 522. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.5.515. Norcross and colleagues (2010) listed it as seventh out of their list of ten most discredited drug and alcohol interventions: Norcross, John C.; Koocher, Gerald P.; Fala, Natalie C.; Wexler, Harry K. (1 September 2010). „What Does Not Work? Expert Consensus on Discredited Treatments in the Addictions“. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 4 (3): 174 – 180. doi:10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181c5f9db. PMID 21769032. Glasner-Edwards and colleagues also identified it as discredited: Glasner-Edwards, Suzette; Rawson, Richard (1 October 2010). „Evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: Review and recommendations for public policy“. Health Policy. 97 (2 – 3): 93 – 104. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.013. PMC 2951979. PMID 20557970.
  • See the following: Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). „Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?“. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0. Corballis, M.C. (1999). „Are we in our right minds?“. In S.D. Sala (ed.). Mind Myths: Exploring Popular Assumptions About the Mind and Brain (Repr. ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. p. 41. ISBN 978-0-471-98303-3. Drenth, Pieter J.D (2003). „Growing anti-intellectualism in Europe; a menace to science“ (PDF). Studia Psychologica. 45: 5 – 13. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2011. Beyerstein, B.L (1990). „Brainscams: Neuromythologies of the New Age“. International Journal of Mental Health. 19 (3): 27 – 36 (27). doi:10.1080/00207411.1990.11449169. For more information on the use of neuroscience terms to lend the appearance of credibility to arguments, see Weisberg, D. S.; Keil, F. C.; Goodstein, J.; Rawson, E.; Gray, J. R. (2008). „The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations“. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 20 (3): 470 – 7. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20040. PMC 2778755. PMID 18004955

pan.pl

journals.pan.pl

  • See, for instance, the following: Sharpley, Christopher. F. (1984). „Predicate matching in NLP: a review of research on the preferred representational system“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 31 (2): 238 – 48. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.238. Sharpley, Christopher F. (1 January 1987). „Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103 – 107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. Heap. M., (1988) Neurolinguistic programming: An interim verdict Archived 15 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine. In M. Heap (Ed.) Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practices. London: Croom Helm, pp. 268 – 280. Druckman, Daniel; Swets, John A. (1988). „Enhancing human performance: Issues, theories, and techniques“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 1(2): 202 – 206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920010212. Druckman, Daniel (1 November 2004). „Be All That You Can Be: Enhancing Human Performance“. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 34 (11): 2234 – 2260. von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). „Selected alternative training techniques in HRD“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 8 (4): 281 – 294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). „Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?“. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0.

sagepub.com

journals.sagepub.com

surrey.ac.uk

som.surrey.ac.uk

web.archive.org

  • Tosey, P. & Mathison, J., (2006) "Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming Архив на оригинала от 2019-01-03 в Wayback Machine. Centre for Management Learning & Development, School of Management, University of Surrey.
  • See, for instance, the following: Sharpley, Christopher. F. (1984). „Predicate matching in NLP: a review of research on the preferred representational system“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 31 (2): 238 – 48. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.238. Sharpley, Christopher F. (1 January 1987). „Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103 – 107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. Heap. M., (1988) Neurolinguistic programming: An interim verdict Archived 15 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine. In M. Heap (Ed.) Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practices. London: Croom Helm, pp. 268 – 280. Druckman, Daniel; Swets, John A. (1988). „Enhancing human performance: Issues, theories, and techniques“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 1(2): 202 – 206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920010212. Druckman, Daniel (1 November 2004). „Be All That You Can Be: Enhancing Human Performance“. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 34 (11): 2234 – 2260. von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). „Selected alternative training techniques in HRD“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 8 (4): 281 – 294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). „Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?“. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0.

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). „Selected alternative training techniques in HRD“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 8 (4): 281 – 294]
  • Druckman, Daniel (1 November 2004). „Be All That You Can Be: Enhancing Human Performance“. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 34 (11): 2234 – 2260.
  • See, for instance, the following: Sharpley, Christopher. F. (1984). „Predicate matching in NLP: a review of research on the preferred representational system“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 31 (2): 238 – 48. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.238. Sharpley, Christopher F. (1 January 1987). „Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?“. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103 – 107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. Heap. M., (1988) Neurolinguistic programming: An interim verdict Archived 15 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine. In M. Heap (Ed.) Hypnosis: Current Clinical, Experimental and Forensic Practices. London: Croom Helm, pp. 268 – 280. Druckman, Daniel; Swets, John A. (1988). „Enhancing human performance: Issues, theories, and techniques“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 1(2): 202 – 206. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920010212. Druckman, Daniel (1 November 2004). „Be All That You Can Be: Enhancing Human Performance“. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 34 (11): 2234 – 2260. von Bergen, C. W.; Gary, Barlow Soper; Rosenthal, T.; Wilkinson, Lamar V. (1997). „Selected alternative training techniques in HRD“. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 8 (4): 281 – 294. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920080403. Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). „Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?“. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0.