Lakatos, I., Feyerabend, P., Motterlini, M. For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. University of Chicago Press, 1999. ISBN 9780226467740. с. 20. The demarcation problem may be formulated in the following terms: what distinguishes science from pseudoscience? This is an extreme way of putting it, since the more general problem, called the Generalized Demarcation Problem, is really the problem of the appraisal of scientific theories, and attempts to answer the question: when is one theory better than another?
Resnik, David B. A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem // Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2). 2000. DOI:10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00004-2. с. 249 – 267.
encyclopedia.com
Boyer P. S.«Pseudoscience and Quackery» // The Oxford Companion to United States History. Oxford University Press, USA, 2001. ISBN 978-0-19-508209-8 „..many late‐twentieth‐century scholars dismissed demarcating between science and pseudoscience as „a pseudo‐problem““.
google.ru
books.google.ru
Sorensen R. A. Pseudo-problems: how analytic philosophy gets done. Routledge, 1993. p.40
stanford.edu
plato.stanford.edu
Thornton, Stephen. „Karl Popper“, // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.). (на английски)
