Revisió sistemàtica (Catalan Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Revisió sistemàtica" in Catalan language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Catalan rank

66doi.org

2^nd place

6^th place

60nih.gov

4^th place

7^th place

10cochrane.org

7,609^th place

8,795^th place

7worldcat.org

5^th place

6whiterose.ac.uk

4,124^th place

low place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

3harvard.edu

18^th place

40^th place

2ioe.ac.uk

low place

2prisma-statement.org

low place

2retractionwatch.com

low place

2york.ac.uk

7,670^th place

7,094^th place

1temple.edu

8,886^th place

low place

1cebm.net

low place

1cebma.org

low place

1nla.gov.au

275^th place

838^th place

1bmj.com

1,226^th place

517^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

215^th place

1equator-network.org

low place

1lnu.se

low place

1cqu.edu.au

low place

1nihr.ac.uk

low place

1lshtm.ac.uk

low place

1iflscience.com

low place

1libguides.com

low place

2,823^rd place

1alltrials.net

low place

1vu.nl

8,540^th place

8,898^th place

1exlibrisgroup.com

9,042^nd place

low place

alltrials.net

«Half of all clinical trials have never reported results». AllTrials, 20-08-2015. [Consulta: 8 març 2019].

bmj.com

bestpractice.bmj.com

«What is GRADE?» (en anglès). BMJ Best Practice. [Consulta: 26 agost 2020].

books.google.com

Advising on Research Methods: A Consultant's Companion (en anglès). Johannes van Kessel Publishing., 2008. ISBN 978-90-79418-01-5.

cebm.net

«What is EBM?». Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, 20-11-2009. Arxivat de l'original el 2011-04-06. [Consulta: 17 juny 2011].

cebma.org

Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Wiley Blackwell, 2006. ISBN 978-1-4051-2110-1.

cochrane.org

training.cochrane.org

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (en anglès), 2019-09-20, p. section 4.6 (version 6.1).
GRADE Handbook (en anglès), 2013.
«5. Handsearching» (en anglès). training.cochrane.org. [Consulta: 14 setembre 2020].
«Chapter 4: Searching for and selecting studies». A: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (en anglès), 2019-09-20, p. section 4.6 (version 6.1).

community.cochrane.org

«1.1.2 A brief history of Cochrane» (en anglès). community.cochrane.org. Arxivat de l'original el 2019-01-17. [Consulta: 24 febrer 2019].

covidrapidreviews.cochrane.org

«Home» (en anglès). covidrapidreviews.cochrane.org. [Consulta: 1r juliol 2020].

cccrg.cochrane.org

«Animated Storyboard: What Are Systematic Reviews?». cccrg.cochrane.org. Cochrane Consumers and Communication. [Consulta: 1r juny 2016].

handbook.cochrane.org

«Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011)». The Cochrane Collaboration. [Consulta: 2 juny 2016].

cochrane.org

«The difference we make». www.cochrane.org. [Consulta: 8 març 2019].

editorial-unit.cochrane.org

«Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR)». Cochrane. [Consulta: 6 octubre 2014].

cqu.edu.au

libguides.library.cqu.edu.au

«What is a rapid review? Systematic Review Library Guides at CQ University». library.cqu.edu.au. Arxivat de l'original el 2020-09-16. [Consulta: 16 setembre 2020].

doi.org

dx.doi.org

«Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review». Journal of Public Health, vol. 33, 1, March 2011, pàg. 147–150. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015. PMID: 21345890.
«On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies». Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 42, 2014, pàg. 67–77. Bibcode: 2014ESPol..42...67B. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010.
Clarke, Mike; Chalmers, Iain «Reflections on the history of systematic reviews» (en anglès). BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 23, 4, August 2018, pàg. 121–122. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110968. ISSN: 2515-446X. PMID: 29921711.
«Report on Certain Enteric Fever Inoculation Statistics». British Medical Journal. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2, 2288, November 1904, pàg. 1243–1246. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.2288.1243. PMC: 2355479. PMID: 20761760.
«Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction». The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 327, 4, July 1992, pàg. 248–254. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199207233270406. PMID: 1614465.
«Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine». Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 124, 3, September 2009, pàg. 982–988. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03928. PMC: 2746659. PMID: 19730323.
«Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education». Medical Education, vol. 47, 3, March 2013, pàg. 252–260. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12092. PMID: 23398011.
«Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 97, May 2018, pàg. 79–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022. PMID: 29222060.
«Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 97, May 2018, pàg. 70–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.029. PMID: 29242095.
«A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies». Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 26, 2, June 2009, pàg. 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. PMID: 19490148.
Topor, Marta; Pickering, Jade S.; Mendes, Ana Barbosa; Bishop, Dorothy V. M.; Büttner, Fionn; Elsherif, Mahmoud M.; Evans, Thomas R.; Henderson, Emma L.; Kalandadze, Tamara «An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR).» (en anglès). Meta-Psychology, vol. 7, 10-07-2023. DOI: 10.15626/MP.2021.2840. ISSN: 2003-2714.
«RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews». Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 69, 5, May 2013, pàg. 987–1004. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12092. PMC: 3558334. PMID: 23356699.
«RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses». Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 69, 5, May 2013, pàg. 1005–1022. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12095. PMC: 3558331. PMID: 23356726.
«Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework». International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, 2005, pàg. 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
«A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies». Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 26, 2, June 2009, pàg. 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. PMID: 19490148.
«Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement». Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, 1, January 2015, pàg. 1. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. PMC: 4320440. PMID: 25554246.
«Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques». Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 27, 2, June 2010, pàg. 114–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x. PMID: 20565552.
«Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 68, 6, June 2015, pàg. 617–626. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025. PMID: 25766056.
«Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors». PLOS ONE, vol. 10, 5, 04-05-2015, pàg. e0125931. Bibcode: 2015PLoSO..1025931K. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125931. PMC: 4418838. PMID: 25938454.
«Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 104, 4, October 2016, pàg. 267–277. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2016.139. PMC: 5079487. PMID: 27822147.
«Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, 9, September 2014, pàg. 1001–1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.003. PMID: 24841794.
«Engaging medical librarians to improve the quality of review articles». JAMA, vol. 312, 10, September 2014, pàg. 999–1000. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.9263. PMID: 25203078.
«Systematic review toolbox». A: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. Nanjing, China: Association for Computing Machinery, 2015-04-27, p. 1–6 (EASE '15). DOI 10.1145/2745802.2745824. ISBN 978-1-4503-3350-4.
«Developing methods for the overarching synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence: The interweave synthesis approach». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 11, 4, July 2020, pàg. 507–521. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1383. PMC: 7383598. PMID: 31725951.
«Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions». BMJ Global Health, vol. 4, Suppl 1, 01-01-2019, pàg. e000858. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000858. PMC: 6350707. PMID: 30775014.
«Bursting out of our bubble: using creative techniques to communicate within the systematic review process and beyond». Systematic Reviews, vol. 11, 1, April 2022, pàg. 56. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-01935-2. PMC: 8977563. PMID: 35379331.
«Systematic review automation technologies». Systematic Reviews, vol. 3, 1, July 2014, pàg. 74. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74. PMC: 4100748. PMID: 25005128.
«Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap». PLOS Medicine, vol. 11, 2, February 2014, pàg. e1001603. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603. PMC: 3928029. PMID: 24558353.
«Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence». Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, 1, October 2020, pàg. 243. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01450-2. PMC: 7574591. PMID: 33076975.
«Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis». JMIR, vol. 10, 5, 2022, pàg. e33219. DOI: 10.2196/33219. PMC: 9112080. PMID: 35499859.
«Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews». PLOS Medicine, vol. 4, 3, March 2007, pàg. e78. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078. PMC: 1831728. PMID: 17388659.
«How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis». Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 147, 4, August 2007, pàg. 224–233. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-4-200708210-00179. PMID: 17638714.
«Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search». International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 19, 1, 2003, pàg. 168–178. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462303000163. PMID: 12701949.
«The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change». BMJ, vol. 350, June 2015, pàg. h2463. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2463. PMID: 26041754.
«The scandal of poor medical research». BMJ, vol. 308, 6924, January 1994, pàg. 283–284. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283. PMC: 2539276. PMID: 8124111.
«Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis». American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 140, 9, November 1994, pàg. 771–778. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117324. PMID: 7977286.
«Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions». The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2015, 10, October 2014, pàg. MR000035. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2. PMC: 8191366. PMID: 25271098.
«Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases». Health Technology Assessment, vol. 14, 8, February 2010, pàg. iii, ix-xi, 1–193. DOI: 10.3310/hta14080. PMID: 20181324.
«Nearly half of all trials run by major sponsors in past decade are unpublished». BMJ, vol. 355, November 2016, pàg. i5955. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5955. PMID: 27815253.
«Industry sponsorship and research outcome». The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2017, 2, February 2017, pàg. MR000033. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3. PMC: 8132492. PMID: 28207928.
«An assessment of the compliance of systematic review articles published in craniofacial surgery with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review». Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, vol. 44, 10, October 2016, pàg. 1522–1530. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.018. PMID: 27575881.
«Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA Statement». JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, vol. 18, 2, 01-03-2016, pàg. 101–105. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1726. PMID: 26719993.
«Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature». Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 39, May 2017, pàg. 45–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016. PMID: 28246008.
«Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement». BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 17, 1, December 2017, pàg. 178. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0450-1. PMC: 5745614. PMID: 29281981.
«Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 11, 3, May 2020, pàg. 354–362. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1396. PMID: 31955502.
«Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study». PLOS ONE, vol. 11, 9, 26-09-2016, pàg. e0163309. Bibcode: 2016PLoSO..1163309K. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309. PMC: 5036875. PMID: 27669416.
«Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 97, 1, January 2009, pàg. 21–29. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.004. PMC: 2605027. PMID: 19158999.
«Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 105, 3, July 2017, pàg. 233–239. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2017.246. PMC: 5490700. PMID: 28670210.
«Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 5, 2, June 2014, pàg. 116–130. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1098. PMC: 5861495. PMID: 26052651.
«A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 9, 1, March 2018, pàg. 89–99. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1275. PMID: 29065246.
«Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 61, 5, May 2008, pàg. 440–448. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.005. PMID: 18394536.
«PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 109, 2, April 2021, pàg. 174–200. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YGN9W. PMC: 8270366. PMID: 34285662.
«PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 75, July 2016, pàg. 40–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. PMID: 27005575.
«AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both». BMJ, vol. 358, September 2017, pàg. j4008. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. PMC: 5833365. PMID: 28935701.
«Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews». BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 7, 1, February 2007, pàg. 10. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10. PMC: 1810543. PMID: 17302989.
«AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, 10, October 2009, pàg. 1013–1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009. PMID: 19230606.
«ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 69, January 2016, pàg. 225–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. PMC: 4687950. PMID: 26092286.
«Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework». International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, 2005, pàg. 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
«Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews». International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 13, 3, September 2015, pàg. 141–146. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. PMID: 26134548.
«Scoping studies: advancing the methodology». Implementation Science, vol. 5, 1, September 2010, pàg. 69. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. PMC: 2954944. PMID: 20854677.
«Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, 12, December 2014, pàg. 1291–1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013. PMID: 25034198.
«Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review». Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 7, 2019, pàg. 79. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00079. PMC: 6467093. PMID: 31024880.
«Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects». Research Involvement and Engagement, vol. 3, 1, 21-04-2017, pàg. 9. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-017-0060-4. PMC: 5611627. PMID: 29062534.
«Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach». BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 18, 1, November 2018, pàg. 143. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. PMC: 6245623. PMID: 30453902.
«Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework». International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, 1, 01-02-2005, pàg. 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
«PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation». Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, 7, October 2018, pàg. 467–473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. PMID: 30178033.

equator-network.org

«Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement». www.equator-network.org. [Consulta: 29 juny 2020].

exlibrisgroup.com

unisa.alma.exlibrisgroup.com

«Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews». International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 13, 3, September 2015, pàg. 141–146. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. PMID: 26134548.

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

«On the use of systematic reviews to inform environmental policies». Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 42, 2014, pàg. 67–77. Bibcode: 2014ESPol..42...67B. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.010.
«Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors». PLOS ONE, vol. 10, 5, 04-05-2015, pàg. e0125931. Bibcode: 2015PLoSO..1025931K. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125931. PMC: 4418838. PMID: 25938454.
«Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study». PLOS ONE, vol. 11, 9, 26-09-2016, pàg. e0163309. Bibcode: 2016PLoSO..1163309K. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309. PMC: 5036875. PMID: 27669416.

iflscience.com

«Retraction Of Scientific Papers For Fraud Or Bias Is Just The Tip Of The Iceberg». IFL Science!, 12-06-2015. [Consulta: 29 juny 2015].

ioe.ac.uk

eppi.ioe.ac.uk

«History of Systematic Reviews». Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre). [Consulta: 24 febrer 2019].
«EPPI-Centre Home». eppi.ioe.ac.uk. [Consulta: 29 juny 2020].

libguides.com

flinders.libguides.com

Flinders University Library. «Search Smart: Systematic Reviews: Methodology overview» (en anglès). flinders.libguides.com. [Consulta: 16 setembre 2020].

lnu.se

open.lnu.se

Topor, Marta; Pickering, Jade S.; Mendes, Ana Barbosa; Bishop, Dorothy V. M.; Büttner, Fionn; Elsherif, Mahmoud M.; Evans, Thomas R.; Henderson, Emma L.; Kalandadze, Tamara «An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR).» (en anglès). Meta-Psychology, vol. 7, 10-07-2023. DOI: 10.15626/MP.2021.2840. ISSN: 2003-2714.

lshtm.ac.uk

researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk

«The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change». BMJ, vol. 350, June 2015, pàg. h2463. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2463. PMID: 26041754.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

«Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review». Journal of Public Health, vol. 33, 1, March 2011, pàg. 147–150. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015. PMID: 21345890.
Clarke, Mike; Chalmers, Iain «Reflections on the history of systematic reviews» (en anglès). BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 23, 4, August 2018, pàg. 121–122. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110968. ISSN: 2515-446X. PMID: 29921711.
«Report on Certain Enteric Fever Inoculation Statistics». British Medical Journal. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2, 2288, November 1904, pàg. 1243–1246. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.2288.1243. PMC: 2355479. PMID: 20761760.
«Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction». The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 327, 4, July 1992, pàg. 248–254. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199207233270406. PMID: 1614465.
«Archie Cochrane and his vision for evidence-based medicine». Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 124, 3, September 2009, pàg. 982–988. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03928. PMC: 2746659. PMID: 19730323.
«Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education». Medical Education, vol. 47, 3, March 2013, pàg. 252–260. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12092. PMID: 23398011.
«Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 97, May 2018, pàg. 79–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022. PMID: 29222060.
«Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 97, May 2018, pàg. 70–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.029. PMID: 29242095.
«A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies». Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 26, 2, June 2009, pàg. 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. PMID: 19490148.
«RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews». Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 69, 5, May 2013, pàg. 987–1004. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12092. PMC: 3558334. PMID: 23356699.
«RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses». Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 69, 5, May 2013, pàg. 1005–1022. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12095. PMC: 3558331. PMID: 23356726.
«A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies». Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 26, 2, June 2009, pàg. 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. PMID: 19490148.
«Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement». Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, 1, January 2015, pàg. 1. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. PMC: 4320440. PMID: 25554246.
«Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques». Health Information and Libraries Journal, vol. 27, 2, June 2010, pàg. 114–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x. PMID: 20565552.
«Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 68, 6, June 2015, pàg. 617–626. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025. PMID: 25766056.
«Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors». PLOS ONE, vol. 10, 5, 04-05-2015, pàg. e0125931. Bibcode: 2015PLoSO..1025931K. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125931. PMC: 4418838. PMID: 25938454.
«Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 104, 4, October 2016, pàg. 267–277. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2016.139. PMC: 5079487. PMID: 27822147.
«Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, 9, September 2014, pàg. 1001–1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.003. PMID: 24841794.
«Engaging medical librarians to improve the quality of review articles». JAMA, vol. 312, 10, September 2014, pàg. 999–1000. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.9263. PMID: 25203078.
«Developing methods for the overarching synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence: The interweave synthesis approach». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 11, 4, July 2020, pàg. 507–521. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1383. PMC: 7383598. PMID: 31725951.
«Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions». BMJ Global Health, vol. 4, Suppl 1, 01-01-2019, pàg. e000858. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000858. PMC: 6350707. PMID: 30775014.
«Bursting out of our bubble: using creative techniques to communicate within the systematic review process and beyond». Systematic Reviews, vol. 11, 1, April 2022, pàg. 56. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-01935-2. PMC: 8977563. PMID: 35379331.
«Systematic review automation technologies». Systematic Reviews, vol. 3, 1, July 2014, pàg. 74. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-74. PMC: 4100748. PMID: 25005128.
«Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap». PLOS Medicine, vol. 11, 2, February 2014, pàg. e1001603. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603. PMC: 3928029. PMID: 24558353.
«Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence». Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, 1, October 2020, pàg. 243. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01450-2. PMC: 7574591. PMID: 33076975.
«Web-Based Software Tools for Systematic Literature Review in Medicine: Systematic Search and Feature Analysis». JMIR, vol. 10, 5, 2022, pàg. e33219. DOI: 10.2196/33219. PMC: 9112080. PMID: 35499859.
«Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews». PLOS Medicine, vol. 4, 3, March 2007, pàg. e78. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078. PMC: 1831728. PMID: 17388659.
«How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis». Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 147, 4, August 2007, pàg. 224–233. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-4-200708210-00179. PMID: 17638714.
«Beyond Medline: reducing bias through extended systematic review search». International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 19, 1, 2003, pàg. 168–178. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462303000163. PMID: 12701949.
«The knowledge system underpinning healthcare is not fit for purpose and must change». BMJ, vol. 350, June 2015, pàg. h2463. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2463. PMID: 26041754.
«The scandal of poor medical research». BMJ, vol. 308, 6924, January 1994, pàg. 283–284. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.308.6924.283. PMC: 2539276. PMID: 8124111.
«Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis». American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 140, 9, November 1994, pàg. 771–778. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117324. PMID: 7977286.
«Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions». The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2015, 10, October 2014, pàg. MR000035. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2. PMC: 8191366. PMID: 25271098.
«Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases». Health Technology Assessment, vol. 14, 8, February 2010, pàg. iii, ix-xi, 1–193. DOI: 10.3310/hta14080. PMID: 20181324.
«Nearly half of all trials run by major sponsors in past decade are unpublished». BMJ, vol. 355, November 2016, pàg. i5955. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i5955. PMID: 27815253.
«Industry sponsorship and research outcome». The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2017, 2, February 2017, pàg. MR000033. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3. PMC: 8132492. PMID: 28207928.
«An assessment of the compliance of systematic review articles published in craniofacial surgery with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review». Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, vol. 44, 10, October 2016, pàg. 1522–1530. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.018. PMID: 27575881.
«Compliance of Systematic Reviews in Plastic Surgery With the PRISMA Statement». JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, vol. 18, 2, 01-03-2016, pàg. 101–105. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.1726. PMID: 26719993.
«Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature». Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 39, May 2017, pàg. 45–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016. PMID: 28246008.
«Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement». BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 17, 1, December 2017, pàg. 178. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0450-1. PMC: 5745614. PMID: 29281981.
«Adjudication rather than experience of data abstraction matters more in reducing errors in abstracting data in systematic reviews». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 11, 3, May 2020, pàg. 354–362. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1396. PMID: 31955502.
«Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study». PLOS ONE, vol. 11, 9, 26-09-2016, pàg. e0163309. Bibcode: 2016PLoSO..1163309K. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309. PMC: 5036875. PMID: 27669416.
«Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 97, 1, January 2009, pàg. 21–29. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.004. PMC: 2605027. PMID: 19158999.
«Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 105, 3, July 2017, pàg. 233–239. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2017.246. PMC: 5490700. PMID: 28670210.
«Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 5, 2, June 2014, pàg. 116–130. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1098. PMC: 5861495. PMID: 26052651.
«A review of the reporting of web searching to identify studies for Cochrane systematic reviews». Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 9, 1, March 2018, pàg. 89–99. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1275. PMID: 29065246.
«Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 61, 5, May 2008, pàg. 440–448. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.06.005. PMID: 18394536.
«PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews». Journal of the Medical Library Association, vol. 109, 2, April 2021, pàg. 174–200. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YGN9W. PMC: 8270366. PMID: 34285662.
«PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 75, July 2016, pàg. 40–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021. PMID: 27005575.
«AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both». BMJ, vol. 358, September 2017, pàg. j4008. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. PMC: 5833365. PMID: 28935701.
«Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews». BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 7, 1, February 2007, pàg. 10. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10. PMC: 1810543. PMID: 17302989.
«AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, 10, October 2009, pàg. 1013–1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009. PMID: 19230606.
«ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 69, January 2016, pàg. 225–234. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005. PMC: 4687950. PMID: 26092286.
«Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews». International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, vol. 13, 3, September 2015, pàg. 141–146. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. PMID: 26134548.
«Scoping studies: advancing the methodology». Implementation Science, vol. 5, 1, September 2010, pàg. 69. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. PMC: 2954944. PMID: 20854677.
«Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 67, 12, December 2014, pàg. 1291–1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013. PMID: 25034198.
«Public Involvement in Global Genomics Research: A Scoping Review». Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 7, 2019, pàg. 79. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00079. PMC: 6467093. PMID: 31024880.
«Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects». Research Involvement and Engagement, vol. 3, 1, 21-04-2017, pàg. 9. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-017-0060-4. PMC: 5611627. PMID: 29062534.
«Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach». BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 18, 1, November 2018, pàg. 143. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. PMC: 6245623. PMID: 30453902.
«PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation». Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, 7, October 2018, pàg. 467–473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. PMID: 30178033.

nihr.ac.uk

«How to disseminate your research». www.nihr.ac.uk. [Consulta: 20 maig 2022].

nla.gov.au

catalogue.nla.gov.au

Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship of Class-Size and Achievement. The Class Size and Instruction Project. Washington, D.C.]: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1978.

prisma-statement.org

«PRISMA». www.prisma-statement.org. [Consulta: 1r juliol 2020].
«PRISMA». www.prisma-statement.org. [Consulta: 1r juliol 2020].

retractionwatch.com

«Retraction and republication for Lancet Resp Med tracheostomy paper». Retraction Watch, 02-04-2015. [Consulta: 29 juny 2015].
«BioMed Central retracting 43 papers for fake peer review». Retraction Watch, 26-03-2015.

temple.edu

guides.temple.edu

«What is a systematic review?». Temple University Libraries, 06-06-2022. [Consulta: 15 juny 2022].

vu.nl

research.vu.nl

«AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, 10, October 2009, pàg. 1013–1020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009. PMID: 19230606.

web.archive.org

«What is EBM?». Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, 20-11-2009. Arxivat de l'original el 2011-04-06. [Consulta: 17 juny 2011].
«1.1.2 A brief history of Cochrane» (en anglès). community.cochrane.org. Arxivat de l'original el 2019-01-17. [Consulta: 24 febrer 2019].
«What is a rapid review? Systematic Review Library Guides at CQ University». library.cqu.edu.au. Arxivat de l'original el 2020-09-16. [Consulta: 16 setembre 2020].

whiterose.ac.uk

eprints.whiterose.ac.uk

«Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 6: reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 97, May 2018, pàg. 79–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022. PMID: 29222060.
«Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 5: methods for integrating qualitative and implementation evidence within intervention effectiveness reviews». Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 97, May 2018, pàg. 70–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.029. PMID: 29242095.
«Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework». International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, 2005, pàg. 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
«Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework». International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, 2005, pàg. 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
«Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework». International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, 1, 01-02-2005, pàg. 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.
«PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation». Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, 7, October 2018, pàg. 467–473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. PMID: 30178033.

worldcat.org

Clarke, Mike; Chalmers, Iain «Reflections on the history of systematic reviews» (en anglès). BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, vol. 23, 4, August 2018, pàg. 121–122. DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-110968. ISSN: 2515-446X. PMID: 29921711.
Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on health services. [London]: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, 1972. ISBN 0-900574-17-8. OCLC 741462.
Testing treatments : better research for better healthcare. Second. London: Pinter & Martin, 2011. ISBN 978-1-905177-48-6. OCLC 778837501.
Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions, 2016, p. 32. OCLC 944453327.
Topor, Marta; Pickering, Jade S.; Mendes, Ana Barbosa; Bishop, Dorothy V. M.; Büttner, Fionn; Elsherif, Mahmoud M.; Evans, Thomas R.; Henderson, Emma L.; Kalandadze, Tamara «An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR).» (en anglès). Meta-Psychology, vol. 7, 10-07-2023. DOI: 10.15626/MP.2021.2840. ISSN: 2003-2714.
Guidance on choosing qualitative evidence synthesis methods for use in health technology assessments of complex interventions, 2016, p. 32. OCLC 944453327.
How to Perform a Systematic Literature Review: a guide for healthcare researchers, practitioners and students.. Springer Nature, 2020. ISBN 978-3-030-49672-2. OCLC 1182880684.

york.ac.uk

Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care.. York: University of York, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2008. ISBN 978-1-900640-47-3.

crd.york.ac.uk

«PROSPERO». Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. University of York. [Consulta: 24 febrer 2019].