Stephen C. Meyer and Paul A. Nelson. CSC – Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules, A book review, Origins & Design [online]. May 1, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. Dostupné online.
Phillip E. Johnson. Starting a Conversation about Evolution [online]. Access Research Network, August 31, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. (Phillip Johnson Files). Dostupné online.
Stephen C. Meyer and Paul A. Nelson. CSC – Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules, A book review, Origins & Design [online]. May 1, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. Dostupné online.
Phillip E. Johnson. Starting a Conversation about Evolution [online]. Access Research Network, August 31, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. (Phillip Johnson Files). Dostupné online.
Stephen C. Meyer and Paul A. Nelson. CSC – Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules, A book review, Origins & Design [online]. May 1, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. Dostupné online.
Phillip E. Johnson. Starting a Conversation about Evolution [online]. Access Research Network, August 31, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. (Phillip Johnson Files). Dostupné online.
Stephen C. Meyer and Paul A. Nelson. CSC – Getting Rid of the Unfair Rules, A book review, Origins & Design [online]. May 1, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. Dostupné online.
Phillip E. Johnson. Starting a Conversation about Evolution [online]. Access Research Network, August 31, 1996 [cit. 2007-05-20]. (Phillip Johnson Files). Dostupné online.
Nature Methods Editorial. An intelligently designed response. Nat. Methods. 2007, roč. 4, čís. 12, s. 983. doi:10.1038/nmeth1207-983.
Mark Greener. Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?. EMBO Reports. 2007, roč. 8, čís. 12, s. 1107–1109. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131.
Attie, A. D. Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action. Journal of Clinical Investigation. American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006, roč. 116, s. 1134–1138. Dostupné online. doi:10.1172/JCI28449.
H. Allen Orr. Devolution—Why intelligent design isn't [online]. May 2005. (Annals of Science). Dostupné online.
Attie, A. D. Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action. Journal of Clinical Investigation. American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006, roč. 116, s. 1134–1138. Dostupné online. doi:10.1172/JCI28449.
H. Allen Orr. Devolution—Why intelligent design isn't [online]. May 2005. (Annals of Science). Dostupné online.
„Q. Has the Discovery Institute been a leader in the intelligent design movement? A. Yes, the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Q. And are almost all of the individuals who are involved with the intelligent design movement associated with the Discovery Institute? A. All of the leaders are, yes.“Barbara Forrest, 2005, testifying in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Trial transcript: Day 6 (October 5), PM Session, Part 1. [online]. TalkOrigins Archive, 2005 [cit. 2007-07-19]. Dostupné online.
„The Discovery Institute is the ideological and strategic backbone behind the eruption of skirmishes over science in school districts and state capitals across the country“. In: Wilgoren, J. Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive. New York Times. August 21, 2005. Dostupné online [PDF, cit. 2007-07-19].
Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences [online]. Second Edition. vyd. National Academy of Sciences, 1999. Dostupné online.
Attie, A. D. Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action. Journal of Clinical Investigation. American Society for Clinical Investigation, 2006, roč. 116, s. 1134–1138. Dostupné online. doi:10.1172/JCI28449.
H. Allen Orr. Devolution—Why intelligent design isn't [online]. May 2005. (Annals of Science). Dostupné online.
„Q. Has the Discovery Institute been a leader in the intelligent design movement? A. Yes, the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Q. And are almost all of the individuals who are involved with the intelligent design movement associated with the Discovery Institute? A. All of the leaders are, yes.“Barbara Forrest, 2005, testifying in the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District Trial transcript: Day 6 (October 5), PM Session, Part 1. [online]. TalkOrigins Archive, 2005 [cit. 2007-07-19]. Dostupné online.
„The Discovery Institute is the ideological and strategic backbone behind the eruption of skirmishes over science in school districts and state capitals across the country“. In: Wilgoren, J. Politicized Scholars Put Evolution on the Defensive. New York Times. August 21, 2005. Dostupné online [PDF, cit. 2007-07-19].
assembly.coe.int [online]. [cit. 27-08-2018]. Dostupné v archivu pořízeném dne 04-07-2007.
Science and Policy: Intelligent Design and Peer Review [online]. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2007 [cit. 2007-07-19]. Dostupné v archivu pořízeném dne 2012-06-06.
William A. Dembski, when asked in an interview whether his research concluded that God is the Intelligent Designer, stated „I believe God created the world for a purpose. The Designer of intelligent design is, ultimately, the Christian God“. Devon Williams. CitizenLink: Friday Five: William A. Dembski [online]. Focus on the Family, December 14, 2007 [cit. 2007-12-15]. Dostupné v archivu pořízeném dne 2007-12-17.
David Mu. Trojan Horse or Legitimate Science: Deconstructing the Debate over Intelligent Design. Harvard Science Review. Fall 2005, roč. 19, čís. 1. Dostupné v archivu pořízeném dne 24-07-2007.
