Nevěda (Czech Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Nevěda" in Czech language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Czech rank

6books.google.com

3^rd place

25^th place

179^th place

282^nd place

2,963^rd place

21^st place

5^th place

3^rd place

2^nd place

4^th place

26^th place

45^th place

1philosophynow.org

low place

low place

1smithsonianmag.com

503^rd place

497^th place

960^th place

1,013^th place

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Czech: 25^th place)

ENGER, Eldon; ROSS, Frederick; BAILEY, David. Concepts in Biology. [s.l.]: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2014. Dostupné online. ISBN 9780077418281. S. 10. (anglicky)
STENMARK, Mikael. Scientism: Science, Ethics and Religion: Science, Ethics and Religion. [s.l.]: Routledge, 2018-01-12. Dostupné online. ISBN 9781351815390. S. 19–20. (anglicky)
AYALA, Francisco. Darwin's Gift: To Science and Religion. [s.l.]: Joseph Henry Press, 2007-05-07. Dostupné online. ISBN 9780309661744. S. 178. (anglicky)
Bishop, Alan (1997)."Mathematical Enculturation: A Cultural Perspective on Mathematics Education." Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 54.
HECHT, David K. Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science. Redakce Kaufman Allison B.. [s.l.]: MIT Press, 2018-01-05. ISBN 9780262037426. Kapitola Pseudoscience and the Pursuit of Truth, s. 8–9. (anglicky)
TAYLOR, C.A. Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation. [s.l.]: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996. (Rhetoric of the Human Sciences Series). Dostupné online. ISBN 9780299150341. S. 41.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Czech: 4^th place)

GIERYN, Thomas F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review. 1983, s. 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325. JSTOR 2095325.

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; Czech: 45^th place)

GIERYN, Thomas F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review. 1983, s. 781–795. doi:10.2307/2095325. JSTOR 2095325.

muni.cz (Global: 2,963^rd place; Czech: 21^st place)

phil.muni.cz

NOVÝ, Lubomír. Filosofie a věda. Pro-Fil. 2001, roč. 2, čís. 2. Dostupné online [cit. 2021-06-25]. ISSN 1212-9097.

oecd.org (Global: 960^th place; Czech: 1,013^th place)

Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators. Revised Field of Science and Technology (FOS) Classification in the Frascati Manual {DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI(2006)19/FINAL). [s.l.]: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2007. Dostupné online. (anglicky)

philosophynow.org (Global: low place; Czech: low place)

LAZORKO, Pamela. Science and Non-Science [online]. 2013 [cit. 2018-04-17]. Dostupné online.

smithsonianmag.com (Global: 503^rd place; Czech: 497^th place)

CONNIFF, Richard. Alchemy May Not Have Been the Pseudoscience We All Thought It Was. Smithsonian Magazine. February 2014. Dostupné online [cit. 2018-04-16]. (anglicky)

stanford.edu (Global: 179^th place; Czech: 282^nd place)

plato.stanford.edu

HANSSON, Sven Ove. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Redakce Zalta Edward N.. Summer 2017. vyd. [s.l.]: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017. Dostupné online. Kapitola Science and Pseudo-Science.
NICKLES, Thomas. Historicist Theories of Scientific Rationality. Redakce Zalta Edward N.. Summer 2017. vyd. [s.l.]: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017. Dostupné online.

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; Czech: 3^rd place)

NOVÝ, Lubomír. Filosofie a věda. Pro-Fil. 2001, roč. 2, čís. 2. Dostupné online [cit. 2021-06-25]. ISSN 1212-9097.