Paradox hromady (Czech Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Paradox hromady" in Czech language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Czech rank
2nd place
4th place
low place
low place
5th place
3rd place
6th place
10th place
low place
low place
222nd place
83rd place
26th place
45th place

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Czech: 10th place)

  • SMITH, Nicholas J.J. Vagueness and Degrees of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Dostupné online. 

ceur-ws.org (Global: low place; Czech: low place)

  • BĚHOUNEK, Libor. In Which Sense Is Fuzzy Logic a Logic for Vagueness?. PRUV 2014: Logics for Reasoning About Preferences, Uncertainty, and Vagueness, (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Volume 1205). 2014. Dostupné online. 

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Czech: 4th place)

doi.org

  • COLYVAN, Mark; WEBER, Zach. A Topological Sorites. The Journal of Philosophy [online]. 2010-06-01 [cit. 2019-02-05]. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2010107624. Dostupné online. doi:10.5840/jphil2010107624. 
  • RUSSELL, Bertrand. Vagueness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 1923, roč. 1, čís. 2, s. 84–92. Dostupné online. 
  • QUINE, Willard V. O. What Price Bivalence?. The Journal of Philosophy [online]. 1981-02-01 [cit. 2019-02-05]. DOI: 10.2307/2025901. Dostupné online. doi:10.2307/2025901. 
  • TYE, Michael. Sorites Paradoxes and the Semantics of Vagueness. Philosophical Perspectives. 1994, roč. 8, s. 189. Dostupné online [cit. 2019-02-05]. ISSN 1520-8583. doi:10.2307/2214170. 
  • VAN FRAASSEN, Bas C. Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic. The Journal of Philosophy [online]. 1966-01-01 [cit. 2019-02-07]. DOI: 10.2307/2024549. Dostupné online. doi:10.2307/2024549. 
  • WANG, Wen-Fang. Three-Valued Plurivaluationism: A Reply to Williamson's Criticisms on the Three-Valued Approach to the Sorites Paradox. The Philosophical Forum. 2016, roč. 47, čís. 3–4, s. 341–360. Dostupné online [cit. 2019-02-07]. ISSN 1467-9191. doi:10.1111/phil.12127. (anglicky) 

dx.doi.org

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; Czech: 45th place)

  • UNGER, Peter. There Are No Ordinary Things. Synthese. 1979, roč. 41, čís. 2, s. 117–154. Dostupné online. 

pdcnet.org (Global: low place; Czech: low place)

  • COLYVAN, Mark; WEBER, Zach. A Topological Sorites. The Journal of Philosophy [online]. 2010-06-01 [cit. 2019-02-05]. DOI: 10.5840/jphil2010107624. Dostupné online. doi:10.5840/jphil2010107624. 
  • QUINE, Willard V. O. What Price Bivalence?. The Journal of Philosophy [online]. 1981-02-01 [cit. 2019-02-05]. DOI: 10.2307/2025901. Dostupné online. doi:10.2307/2025901. 
  • VAN FRAASSEN, Bas C. Singular Terms, Truth-Value Gaps, and Free Logic. The Journal of Philosophy [online]. 1966-01-01 [cit. 2019-02-07]. DOI: 10.2307/2024549. Dostupné online. doi:10.2307/2024549. 

wiley.com (Global: 222nd place; Czech: 83rd place)

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • WANG, Wen-Fang. Three-Valued Plurivaluationism: A Reply to Williamson's Criticisms on the Three-Valued Approach to the Sorites Paradox. The Philosophical Forum. 2016, roč. 47, čís. 3–4, s. 341–360. Dostupné online [cit. 2019-02-07]. ISSN 1467-9191. doi:10.1111/phil.12127. (anglicky) 

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Czech: 3rd place)