FANELLI, Daniele. Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. S. e10271. PLoS ONE [online]. 2010-04-21. Roč. 5, čís. 4, s. e10271. Dostupné online. ISSN1932-6203. DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0010271. (anglicky)
Analysis: Most research on PFAS harms is unpublicized. medicalxpress.com [online]. [cit. 2023-07-18]. Dostupné online.
Public Library of Science. Why some human genes are more popular with researchers than others. medicalxpress.com [online]. 2018-09-18 [cit. 2023-04-24]. Dostupné online. (anglicky)
MIHULKA, Stanislav. Válka proti vědě? Proč nemá smysl hrotit debatu proti odpůrcům vědy. osel.cz [online]. 2019-01-18 [cit. 2023-04-24]. Dostupné online.
phys.org
Indiana University. Like Sleeping Beauty, some research lies dormant for decades, study finds. phys.org [online]. 2015-05-25 [cit. 2023-04-24]. Dostupné online. (anglicky)
physicsworld.com
ALLEN, Michael. Leading universities form funding 'clique'. physicsworld.com [online]. 2015-10-30 [cit. 2023-04-24]. Dostupné online. (anglicky)
plos.org
journals.plos.org
FANELLI, Daniele. Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. S. e10271. PLoS ONE [online]. 2010-04-21. Roč. 5, čís. 4, s. e10271. Dostupné online. ISSN1932-6203. DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0010271. (anglicky)
FANELLI, Daniele. Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. S. e10271. PLoS ONE [online]. 2010-04-21. Roč. 5, čís. 4, s. e10271. Dostupné online. ISSN1932-6203. DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0010271. (anglicky)
