Antropocæn (Danish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Antropocæn" in Danish language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Danish rank
6,894th place
16th place
12th place
35th place
234th place
176th place
1st place
1st place
low place
1,649th place
8,492nd place
26th place
low place
2,823rd place

baggrund.com

information.dk

kristeligt-dagblad.dk

nature.com

  • 20 March 2024, nature.com: It’s final: the Anthropocene is not an epoch, despite protest over vote. Governing body upholds earlier decision by geoscientists amid drama, backup Citat: "...A high-profile battle over whether to designate the ‘Anthropocene’ as a new geological epoch has come to an end. On 20 March, the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) — the final arbiter in the matter — announced that it is upholding a decision made earlier this month by a group of geoscientists. That group voted on 4 March to reject a proposal that would have established the current era, in which humans are altering the planet, as a formal epoch in Earth’s geological timetable...The IUGS decision effectively terminates a dramatic challenge to that earlier vote: the chair and a vice-chair of the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS), which held the vote, said that it was illegitimate..."

stratigraphy.org.uk

quaternary.stratigraphy.org.uk

theguardian.com

web.archive.org

  • 20 March 2024, nature.com: It’s final: the Anthropocene is not an epoch, despite protest over vote. Governing body upholds earlier decision by geoscientists amid drama, backup Citat: "...A high-profile battle over whether to designate the ‘Anthropocene’ as a new geological epoch has come to an end. On 20 March, the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) — the final arbiter in the matter — announced that it is upholding a decision made earlier this month by a group of geoscientists. That group voted on 4 March to reject a proposal that would have established the current era, in which humans are altering the planet, as a formal epoch in Earth’s geological timetable...The IUGS decision effectively terminates a dramatic challenge to that earlier vote: the chair and a vice-chair of the Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (SQS), which held the vote, said that it was illegitimate..."