Computerprogram (Danish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Computerprogram" in Danish language version.

Last modified: 04:02:18, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank Danish rank

1515web.archive.org

1^st place

33theregister.com

2,921^st place

3,228^th place

22ordnet.dk

6,745^th place

31^st place

21books.google.com

3^rd place

13^th place

11copenhagensoftware.com

low place

11uu.nl

3,118^th place

2,738^th place

11archive.org

6^th place

5^th place

11doi.org

2^nd place

9^th place

11worldcat.org

4^th place

14^th place

11theguardian.com

16^th place

34^th place

11olemiss.edu

9,485^th place

low place

11computer.org

6,549^th place

low place

11version2.dk

low place

381^st place

11cisa.gov

low place

4,718^th place

11microsoft.com

263^rd place

489^th place

11repec.org

4,857^th place

3,315^th place

11dankaminsky.com

low place

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Danish: 5^th place)

Fuegi, J.; Francis, J. (2003). "Lovelace & Babbage and the creation of the 1843 'notes'". Annals of the History of Computing. 25 (4): 16-26. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2003.1253887. ISSN 1058-6180.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Danish: 13^th place)

Evans 2018, s. 21. Evans, Claire L. (2018). Broad Band: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the Internet. New York: Portfolio/Penguin. ISBN 9780735211759.

cisa.gov (Global: low place; Danish: 4,718^th place)

June 26, 2024, cisa.gov: Exploring Memory Safety in Critical Open Source Projects, backup Citat: "...We encourage others to build on this analysis to further expand our collective understanding of memory-unsafety risk in OSS, evaluate approaches—such as targeted rewrites of critical components in memory-safe languages—to reducing this risk, and to continue efforts to drive risk-reducing action by software manufacturers. For those considering further investment in memory safe programming practices, we recommend two references: The Case for Memory Safe Roadmaps and the December 2023 report on memory safety by the Technical Advisory Council of CISA’s Cybersecurity Advisory Committee.37..."

computer.org (Global: 6,549^th place; Danish: low place)

"Embedded Software—Technologies and Trends". IEEE Computer Society. maj-juni 2009. Arkiveret fra originalen 28. oktober 2013. Hentet 6. november 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1-vedligeholdelse: Dato-format (link)

copenhagensoftware.com (Global: low place; Danish: low place)

"læs mere hos Copenhagen Software". Arkiveret fra originalen 16. marts 2021. Hentet 11. marts 2021.

dankaminsky.com (Global: low place; Danish: low place)

Kaminsky, Dan (1999). "Why Open Source Is The Optimum Economic Paradigm for Software". Arkiveret fra originalen 22. maj 2012. Hentet 24. maj 2019.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Danish: 9^th place)

Fuegi, J.; Francis, J. (2003). "Lovelace & Babbage and the creation of the 1843 'notes'". Annals of the History of Computing. 25 (4): 16-26. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2003.1253887. ISSN 1058-6180.

microsoft.com (Global: 263^rd place; Danish: 489^th place)

msdn.microsoft.com

"MSDN Library". Arkiveret fra originalen 11. juni 2010. Hentet 14 juni 2010.

olemiss.edu (Global: 9,485^th place; Danish: low place)

home.olemiss.edu

"System Software". The University of Mississippi. Arkiveret fra originalen 30. maj 2001. Hentet 24. maj 2019.

ordnet.dk (Global: 6,745^th place; Danish: 31^st place)

"ordnet.dk: software". Arkiveret fra originalen 16. februar 2021. Hentet 26. maj 2019.
"ordnet.dk: computerprogram". Arkiveret fra originalen 16. februar 2021. Hentet 26. maj 2019.

repec.org (Global: 4,857^th place; Danish: 3,315^th place)

ideas.repec.org

v. Engelhardt, Sebastian (2008). "The Economic Properties of Software". Jena Economic Research Papers. 2 (2008-045). Arkiveret fra originalen 5. januar 2016. Hentet 24. maj 2019.

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; Danish: 34^th place)

"Ada Lovelace honoured by Google doodle". The Guardian. 10. december 2012. Arkiveret fra originalen 25. juni 2013. Hentet 25. november 2018.

theregister.com (Global: 2,921^st place; Danish: 3,228^th place)

2024-09-20, theregister.com: CISA boss: Makers of insecure software are the real cyber villains. Write better code, urges Jen Easterly. And while you're at it, give crime gangs horrible names like 'Evil Ferret', backup
28 Jun 2024, theregister.com: CISA looked at C/C++ projects and found a lot of C/C++ code. Wanna redo any of it in Rust? So, so many lines of memory-unsafe routines in crucial open source, and unsafe dependencies, backup Citat: "...Memory-safe languages, like C#, Go, Java, Python, Rust, and Swift, handle memory management for the developer, reducing the opportunity to make memory errors...The 2015 stable release of Rust, a language with strong memory-safety guarantees, gave tech firms a non-aligned systems language they could use to avoid the problems with memory-unsafe code. The competitive implications of adopting languages with strong corporate associations, like C# (Microsoft), Go (Google), Swift (Apple), or Java (Oracle) may have helped make Rust more appealing. But it took a few years for Rust to mature and catch on..."
3 Aug 2024, theregister.com: DARPA suggests turning old C code automatically into Rust – using AI, of course. Who wants to make a TRACTOR pull request?, backup Citat: "...The term stands for TRanslating All C TO Rust. It's a DARPA project that aims to develop machine-learning tools that can automate the conversion of legacy C code into Rust. The reason to do so is memory safety. Memory safety bugs, such buffer overflows, account for the majority of major vulnerabilities in large codebases. And DARPA's hope is that AI models can help with the programming language translation, in order to make software more secure..."I think all languages are about trade-offs, but certainly at the kernel-level it makes sense to move part of the code to Rust," he said..."

uu.nl (Global: 3,118^th place; Danish: 2,738^th place)

cs.uu.nl

"Compiler construction". Arkiveret fra originalen 2. november 2013. Hentet 24. maj 2019.

version2.dk (Global: low place; Danish: 381^st place)

2024-09-20, version2.dk: USA’s cyberchef: Dårlige software-udviklere er den største trussel mod sikkerheden. CISA-chefen Jen Easterly skoser teknologileverandører for at levere produkter med indbyggede sikkerhedsproblemer, der åbner dørene for cyberangreb, backup Citat: "...»Vi har ikke et cybersikkerhedsproblem – vi har et softwarekvalitetsproblem. Vi har ikke brug for flere sikkerhedsprodukter – vi har brug for mere sikre produkter,« sagde chefen for den amerikanske cybersikkerhedsmyndighed CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) Jen Easterly på en konference onsdag ifølge The Register. »Sandheden er: Teknologileverandører er de personer, der bygger problemer« ind i deres produkter, som derefter »åbner dørene for skurke, så de kan angribe deres ofre.«..."

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Danish: 1^st place)

"ordnet.dk: software". Arkiveret fra originalen 16. februar 2021. Hentet 26. maj 2019.
"læs mere hos Copenhagen Software". Arkiveret fra originalen 16. marts 2021. Hentet 11. marts 2021.
"ordnet.dk: computerprogram". Arkiveret fra originalen 16. februar 2021. Hentet 26. maj 2019.
"Compiler construction". Arkiveret fra originalen 2. november 2013. Hentet 24. maj 2019.
"Ada Lovelace honoured by Google doodle". The Guardian. 10. december 2012. Arkiveret fra originalen 25. juni 2013. Hentet 25. november 2018.
"System Software". The University of Mississippi. Arkiveret fra originalen 30. maj 2001. Hentet 24. maj 2019.
"Embedded Software—Technologies and Trends". IEEE Computer Society. maj-juni 2009. Arkiveret fra originalen 28. oktober 2013. Hentet 6. november 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1-vedligeholdelse: Dato-format (link)
2024-09-20, version2.dk: USA’s cyberchef: Dårlige software-udviklere er den største trussel mod sikkerheden. CISA-chefen Jen Easterly skoser teknologileverandører for at levere produkter med indbyggede sikkerhedsproblemer, der åbner dørene for cyberangreb, backup Citat: "...»Vi har ikke et cybersikkerhedsproblem – vi har et softwarekvalitetsproblem. Vi har ikke brug for flere sikkerhedsprodukter – vi har brug for mere sikre produkter,« sagde chefen for den amerikanske cybersikkerhedsmyndighed CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) Jen Easterly på en konference onsdag ifølge The Register. »Sandheden er: Teknologileverandører er de personer, der bygger problemer« ind i deres produkter, som derefter »åbner dørene for skurke, så de kan angribe deres ofre.«..."
2024-09-20, theregister.com: CISA boss: Makers of insecure software are the real cyber villains. Write better code, urges Jen Easterly. And while you're at it, give crime gangs horrible names like 'Evil Ferret', backup
28 Jun 2024, theregister.com: CISA looked at C/C++ projects and found a lot of C/C++ code. Wanna redo any of it in Rust? So, so many lines of memory-unsafe routines in crucial open source, and unsafe dependencies, backup Citat: "...Memory-safe languages, like C#, Go, Java, Python, Rust, and Swift, handle memory management for the developer, reducing the opportunity to make memory errors...The 2015 stable release of Rust, a language with strong memory-safety guarantees, gave tech firms a non-aligned systems language they could use to avoid the problems with memory-unsafe code. The competitive implications of adopting languages with strong corporate associations, like C# (Microsoft), Go (Google), Swift (Apple), or Java (Oracle) may have helped make Rust more appealing. But it took a few years for Rust to mature and catch on..."
June 26, 2024, cisa.gov: Exploring Memory Safety in Critical Open Source Projects, backup Citat: "...We encourage others to build on this analysis to further expand our collective understanding of memory-unsafety risk in OSS, evaluate approaches—such as targeted rewrites of critical components in memory-safe languages—to reducing this risk, and to continue efforts to drive risk-reducing action by software manufacturers. For those considering further investment in memory safe programming practices, we recommend two references: The Case for Memory Safe Roadmaps and the December 2023 report on memory safety by the Technical Advisory Council of CISA’s Cybersecurity Advisory Committee.37..."
3 Aug 2024, theregister.com: DARPA suggests turning old C code automatically into Rust – using AI, of course. Who wants to make a TRACTOR pull request?, backup Citat: "...The term stands for TRanslating All C TO Rust. It's a DARPA project that aims to develop machine-learning tools that can automate the conversion of legacy C code into Rust. The reason to do so is memory safety. Memory safety bugs, such buffer overflows, account for the majority of major vulnerabilities in large codebases. And DARPA's hope is that AI models can help with the programming language translation, in order to make software more secure..."I think all languages are about trade-offs, but certainly at the kernel-level it makes sense to move part of the code to Rust," he said..."
"MSDN Library". Arkiveret fra originalen 11. juni 2010. Hentet 14 juni 2010.
v. Engelhardt, Sebastian (2008). "The Economic Properties of Software". Jena Economic Research Papers. 2 (2008-045). Arkiveret fra originalen 5. januar 2016. Hentet 24. maj 2019.
Kaminsky, Dan (1999). "Why Open Source Is The Optimum Economic Paradigm for Software". Arkiveret fra originalen 22. maj 2012. Hentet 24. maj 2019.

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; Danish: 14^th place)

Fuegi, J.; Francis, J. (2003). "Lovelace & Babbage and the creation of the 1843 'notes'". Annals of the History of Computing. 25 (4): 16-26. doi:10.1109/MAHC.2003.1253887. ISSN 1058-6180.

Computerprogram (Danish Wikipedia)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Danish: 5th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Danish: 13th place)

cisa.gov (Global: low place; Danish: 4,718th place)

computer.org (Global: 6,549th place; Danish: low place)

copenhagensoftware.com (Global: low place; Danish: low place)

dankaminsky.com (Global: low place; Danish: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Danish: 9th place)

microsoft.com (Global: 263rd place; Danish: 489th place)

msdn.microsoft.com

olemiss.edu (Global: 9,485th place; Danish: low place)

home.olemiss.edu

ordnet.dk (Global: 6,745th place; Danish: 31st place)

repec.org (Global: 4,857th place; Danish: 3,315th place)

ideas.repec.org

theguardian.com (Global: 16th place; Danish: 34th place)

theregister.com (Global: 2,921st place; Danish: 3,228th place)

uu.nl (Global: 3,118th place; Danish: 2,738th place)

cs.uu.nl

version2.dk (Global: low place; Danish: 381st place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Danish: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; Danish: 14th place)

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Danish: 5^th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Danish: 13^th place)

cisa.gov (Global: low place; Danish: 4,718^th place)

computer.org (Global: 6,549^th place; Danish: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Danish: 9^th place)

microsoft.com (Global: 263^rd place; Danish: 489^th place)

olemiss.edu (Global: 9,485^th place; Danish: low place)

ordnet.dk (Global: 6,745^th place; Danish: 31^st place)

repec.org (Global: 4,857^th place; Danish: 3,315^th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16^th place; Danish: 34^th place)

theregister.com (Global: 2,921^st place; Danish: 3,228^th place)

uu.nl (Global: 3,118^th place; Danish: 2,738^th place)

version2.dk (Global: low place; Danish: 381^st place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Danish: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; Danish: 14^th place)