Microsoft (Danish Wikipedia)

b.dk

• 4. "Microsoft tabte monopolretssagen". Berlinske. 2000-02-25. Hentet 2014-01-15.

burst.com

• 6. Burst.com Inc. (2005-03-11). "Microsoft Corp. Licenses Burst.com Patents & Settles Suit". Pressemeddelelse. Hentet 2008-08-18. Arkiveret fra originalen den 11. oktober 2007.
  * Orlowski, Andrew (2004-03-05). "Eolas' web patent nullified". The Register. Situation Publishing Ltd. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Dennis, Tony (2002-12-24). "Sendo & Microsoft — it all ends in tears". TheInquirer.net. Arkiveret fra originalen 29. maj 2008. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Nystedt, Dan (2005-12-07). "Update: Microsoft fined $32M by South Korea". IDG News Service. Hentet 2008-08-18.

computerworld.dk

• 2. "Officielt: Du får Windows 10 gratis den 29. juli - se alle detaljer her" - Computerworld, d. 1. juni 2015 kl. 10:21
• 13. Jakob Risom (28. november 2000). "Microsoft truede IT-butik i Sorø med navneretssag". Computerworld.

ec.europa.eu

• 8. "Commission Decision of 24.03.2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C-3/37.792 Microsoft)" (PDF). Commission of the European Communities. 2004-04-21. Hentet 5. august 2005.

i-programmer.info

• 3. "30 years ago - Microsoft signs contract with IBM to create MS-DOS" - i-programmer.info, d. 5. november 2010

infoworld.com

• 6. Burst.com Inc. (2005-03-11). "Microsoft Corp. Licenses Burst.com Patents & Settles Suit". Pressemeddelelse. Hentet 2008-08-18. Arkiveret fra originalen den 11. oktober 2007.
  * Orlowski, Andrew (2004-03-05). "Eolas' web patent nullified". The Register. Situation Publishing Ltd. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Dennis, Tony (2002-12-24). "Sendo & Microsoft — it all ends in tears". TheInquirer.net. Arkiveret fra originalen 29. maj 2008. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Nystedt, Dan (2005-12-07). "Update: Microsoft fined $32M by South Korea". IDG News Service. Hentet 2008-08-18.

news.com

• 11. "Full text of Judge Jackson's findings of fact, Sec. 116.: "Whereas Microsoft tried to convince Netscape to move its business in a direction that would not facilitate the emergence of products that would compete with Windows, Microsoft tried to convince IBM to move its business away from products that themselves competed directly with Windows and Office. Microsoft leveraged the fact that the PC Company needed to license Windows at a competitive price and on a timely basis, and the fact that the company needed Microsoft's support in many more subtle ways. When IBM refused to abate the promotion of those of its own products that competed with Windows and Office, Microsoft punished the IBM PC Company with higher prices, a late license for Windows 95, and the withholding of technical and marketing support."". Arkiveret fra originalen 20. februar 2021. Hentet 6. februar 2008.

news.microsoft.com

• 1. Microsoft i tal

news.zdnet.com

• 5. Rodger, Will (1998-11-08). "Intel exec: MS wanted to 'extend, embrace and extinguish' competition". ZDNet. Hentet 2008-08-18.

openacademy.mindef.gov.sg

• 9. "U.S. v. Microsoft: We're Defending Our Right to Innovate". The Wall Street Journal. 1998-05-20. Arkiveret fra originalen 17. november 2007. Hentet 2006-03-31.

theinquirer.net

• 6. Burst.com Inc. (2005-03-11). "Microsoft Corp. Licenses Burst.com Patents & Settles Suit". Pressemeddelelse. Hentet 2008-08-18. Arkiveret fra originalen den 11. oktober 2007.
  * Orlowski, Andrew (2004-03-05). "Eolas' web patent nullified". The Register. Situation Publishing Ltd. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Dennis, Tony (2002-12-24). "Sendo & Microsoft — it all ends in tears". TheInquirer.net. Arkiveret fra originalen 29. maj 2008. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Nystedt, Dan (2005-12-07). "Update: Microsoft fined $32M by South Korea". IDG News Service. Hentet 2008-08-18.

theregister.co.uk

• 6. Burst.com Inc. (2005-03-11). "Microsoft Corp. Licenses Burst.com Patents & Settles Suit". Pressemeddelelse. Hentet 2008-08-18. Arkiveret fra originalen den 11. oktober 2007.
  * Orlowski, Andrew (2004-03-05). "Eolas' web patent nullified". The Register. Situation Publishing Ltd. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Dennis, Tony (2002-12-24). "Sendo & Microsoft — it all ends in tears". TheInquirer.net. Arkiveret fra originalen 29. maj 2008. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Nystedt, Dan (2005-12-07). "Update: Microsoft fined $32M by South Korea". IDG News Service. Hentet 2008-08-18.

usdoj.gov

• 7. "United States v. Microsoft". U.S. Department of Justice. Hentet 5. august 2005.

washingtonpost.com

• 10. Dommer Thomas Penfield Jackson 127: Microsoft later expanded that rule to cover any IBM PCs shipped with the World Book electronic encyclopedia instead of Microsoft’s Encarta.

web.archive.org

• 6. Burst.com Inc. (2005-03-11). "Microsoft Corp. Licenses Burst.com Patents & Settles Suit". Pressemeddelelse. Hentet 2008-08-18. Arkiveret fra originalen den 11. oktober 2007.
  * Orlowski, Andrew (2004-03-05). "Eolas' web patent nullified". The Register. Situation Publishing Ltd. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Dennis, Tony (2002-12-24). "Sendo & Microsoft — it all ends in tears". TheInquirer.net. Arkiveret fra originalen 29. maj 2008. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Nystedt, Dan (2005-12-07). "Update: Microsoft fined $32M by South Korea". IDG News Service. Hentet 2008-08-18.
• 6. Burst.com Inc. (2005-03-11). "Microsoft Corp. Licenses Burst.com Patents & Settles Suit". Pressemeddelelse. Hentet 2008-08-18. Arkiveret fra originalen den 11. oktober 2007.
  * Orlowski, Andrew (2004-03-05). "Eolas' web patent nullified". The Register. Situation Publishing Ltd. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Dennis, Tony (2002-12-24). "Sendo & Microsoft — it all ends in tears". TheInquirer.net. Arkiveret fra originalen 29. maj 2008. Hentet 2006-05-18.
  * Nystedt, Dan (2005-12-07). "Update: Microsoft fined $32M by South Korea". IDG News Service. Hentet 2008-08-18.
• 9. "U.S. v. Microsoft: We're Defending Our Right to Innovate". The Wall Street Journal. 1998-05-20. Arkiveret fra originalen 17. november 2007. Hentet 2006-03-31.
• 11. "Full text of Judge Jackson's findings of fact, Sec. 116.: "Whereas Microsoft tried to convince Netscape to move its business in a direction that would not facilitate the emergence of products that would compete with Windows, Microsoft tried to convince IBM to move its business away from products that themselves competed directly with Windows and Office. Microsoft leveraged the fact that the PC Company needed to license Windows at a competitive price and on a timely basis, and the fact that the company needed Microsoft's support in many more subtle ways. When IBM refused to abate the promotion of those of its own products that competed with Windows and Office, Microsoft punished the IBM PC Company with higher prices, a late license for Windows 95, and the withholding of technical and marketing support."". Arkiveret fra originalen 20. februar 2021. Hentet 6. februar 2008.

• ar Arabic
• az Azerbaijani
• be Belarusian
• bg Bulgarian
• ca Catalan
• cs Czech
• da Danish
• de German
• el Greek
• en English
• eo Esperanto
• es Spanish
• et Estonian
• eu Basque
• fa Persian
• fi Finnish
• fr French
• gl Galician
• he Hebrew
• hi Hindi
• hr Croatian
• hu Hungarian
• hy Armenian
• id Indonesian
• it Italian
• ja Japanese
• ka Georgian
• kk Kazakh
• ko Korean
• la Latin
• lt Lithuanian
• ms Malay
• nl Dutch
• nn Norwegian (Nynorsk)
• no Norwegian
• pl Polish
• pt Portuguese
• ro Romanian
• ru Russian
• sh Serbo-Croatian
• simple Simple English
• sk Slovak
• sl Slovenian
• sr Serbian
• sv Swedish
• ta Tamil
• th Thai
• tr Turkish
• uk Ukrainian
• ur Urdu
• uz Uzbek
• vi Vietnamese
• vo Volapük
• zh Chinese
• zh-min-nan Min Nan
• More languages...