Peter Hartmann, Martin Reuter, Helmuth Nyborg:The relationship between date of birth and individual differences in personality and general intelligence: A large-scale study. In: Personality and Individual Differences. Band40, Nr.7, Mai 2006, S.1349–1362, doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.017 (englisch).
Renier Steyn:Astrological Signs and Personality Differences. In: Journal of Psychology in Africa. Band21, Nr.3, 1.Januar 2011, ISSN1433-0237, S.493–494, doi:10.1080/14330237.2011.10820488 (englisch).
A. Abdel-Khalek, D. Lester:Astrological signs and personality in Kuwaitis and Americans. In: Psychological reports. Vol. 98, Nr.2, April 2006, S.602–607, PMID 16796119 (englisch).; P. C. Austin, M. M. Mamdani, D. N. Juurlink, J. E. Hux:Testing multiple statistical hypotheses resulted in spurious associations: a study of astrological signs and health. In: Journal of clinical epidemiology. Vol. 59, Nr.9, September 2006, S.964–969, doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.012, PMID 16895820 (englisch).; A. J. Wyman, S. Vyse:Science versus the stars: a double-blind test of the validity of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and computer-generated astrological natal charts. In: The Journal of general psychology. Vol. 135, Nr.3, Juli 2008, S.287–300, PMID 18649494 (englisch).; Lower SK:Treating astrology’s claims with all due gravity. In: Nature. Vol. 447, Nr.7144, Mai 2007, S.528, doi:10.1038/447528a, PMID 17538598 (englisch).; Carlson Shawn:A double-blind test of astrology. In: Nature. Vol. 318, Dezember 1985, S.419–425, doi:10.1038/318419a0 (englisch).
Shawn Carlson:A double-blind test of astrology. In: Nature. Vol. 318, Dezember 1985, S.419–425, doi:10.1038/318419a0 (englisch).
Jan J.F. van Rooij:Introversion-extraversion: astrology versus psychology. In: Personality and Individual Differences. Band16, Nr.6, Juni 1994, S.985–988, doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90243-7 (englisch).
“The remarks should not be interpreted as an attempt to defend astrology as it is practiced now by the great majority of astrologists. Modern astrology is in many respects similar to early mediaeval astronomy: it inherited interesting and profound ideas, but it distorted them, and replaced them by caricatures more adapted to the limited understanding of its practitioners. The caricatures are not used for research; there is no attempt to proceed into new domains and to enlarge our knowledge of extra-terrestrial influences; they simply serve as a reservoir of naive rules and phrases suited to impress the ignorant.” Paul Feyerabend: The Strange Case Of Astrology. In: Science in a Free Society. Verso, 1978, S. 96 (PDF).
Karl Popper: Science: Conjectures and Refutations. Vorlesung, gehalten 1953, veröffentlicht unter dem Titel Philosophy of Science: a Personal Report in: C.A. Mace (Hrsg.): British Philosophy in Mid-Century, 1957 (PDF).
Geoffrey Dean, Ivan W. Kelly:Is Astrology Relevant to Consciousness and Psi? In: Journal of Consciousness Studies. Band10, Nr.6-7, 2003, S.175–198 (englisch, journalpsyche.org[PDF]).
A. Abdel-Khalek, D. Lester:Astrological signs and personality in Kuwaitis and Americans. In: Psychological reports. Vol. 98, Nr.2, April 2006, S.602–607, PMID 16796119 (englisch).; P. C. Austin, M. M. Mamdani, D. N. Juurlink, J. E. Hux:Testing multiple statistical hypotheses resulted in spurious associations: a study of astrological signs and health. In: Journal of clinical epidemiology. Vol. 59, Nr.9, September 2006, S.964–969, doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.012, PMID 16895820 (englisch).; A. J. Wyman, S. Vyse:Science versus the stars: a double-blind test of the validity of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and computer-generated astrological natal charts. In: The Journal of general psychology. Vol. 135, Nr.3, Juli 2008, S.287–300, PMID 18649494 (englisch).; Lower SK:Treating astrology’s claims with all due gravity. In: Nature. Vol. 447, Nr.7144, Mai 2007, S.528, doi:10.1038/447528a, PMID 17538598 (englisch).; Carlson Shawn:A double-blind test of astrology. In: Nature. Vol. 318, Dezember 1985, S.419–425, doi:10.1038/318419a0 (englisch).
Sven Ove Hansson: Science and Pseudo-Science, Abschnitt 6. Unity in diversity. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008/2017), Zugriff am 29. September 2019.
Paul R. Thagard: Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Jg. 1978, Bd. 1, S. 223–234 (PDF).
“In the absence [of a more articulated theory], however, neither the astrologer nor the doctor could do research. Though they had rules to apply, they had no puzzles to solve and therefore no science to practise.” Thomas S. Kuhn: Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research? In: I.Lakatos, A.Musgrave (Hrsg.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, London 1970 (23 Seiten; PDF (Memento vom 12. Mai 2013 im Internet Archive)).
Mark Graubard: Astrology and Alchemy: Two Fossile Sciences. Philosophical Library, New York 1953 (Rezension, PDF); ähnlich Lawrence E. Jerome: Astrology and Modern Science: A Critical Analysis. In: Leonardo, Bd. 6, 1973, S. 121–130.
