Alexander Grenz: Datenschutz in Europa und den USA: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung der Safe-Harbor-Lösung (DuD-Fachbeiträge). 1. Auflage. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlag, Wiesbaden 2004, ISBN 3-8244-2185-2, S.52f. (eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
Q. Ashton Acton: Issues in Law Research 2011 Edition. Zwölfter Jahrgang, 1834. ScholarlyEditions, Atlanta GA 2012, ISBN 978-1-4649-6684-2, S.143 (englisch, eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
Greg Martin, Rebecca S. Bray, Miiko Kumar: Secrecy, Law and Society. Zwölfter Jahrgang, 1834. Routledge, New York 2015, ISBN 978-1-138-82685-4, S.50f. (englisch, eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche).
gwu.edu
nsarchive.gwu.edu
Matthew Aid, William Burr, Thomas Blanton: Project Azorian The CIA's Declassified History of the Glomar Explorer. National Security Archive, 12. Februar 2010, abgerufen am 19. Mai 2015 (englisch, infobox): „Glomarization - The name of the CIA ship Hughes Glomar Explorer is infamous in the world of FOIA requesting and litigation. In the wake of the exposés on the Glomar Explorer by Jack Anderson and Seymour Hersh, journalist Harriet Ann Phillippi filed a FOIA request asking for documents on the Agency’s attempts to discourage reporting on the CIA's salvaging project. Rejecting Phillippi’s request, the Agency declared that it could ‘neither confirm nor deny’ its connection with the Glomar Explorer. Phillippi filed a lawsuit, but the U.S. District Court of Appeals upheld the CIA’s position in 1976. Since the Phillippi v CIA decision, the term ‘glomarize’ or ‘glomar response’ have become terms of art to describe the circumstances when the CIA or other agencies claim that they can "neither confirm nor deny" the existence of requested documents. No doubt the CIA will continue to make "Glomar" responses to some declassification requests, but in light of this new release, it is unlikely to ‘glomarize’ the Glomar Explorer.“
