Gruppenpolarisierung (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Gruppenpolarisierung" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
2nd place
3rd place
123rd place
6th place
4th place
7th place
149th place
298th place
222nd place
272nd place
2,912th place
1,242nd place
234th place
203rd place
1,160th place
2,116th place
4,679th place
1,728th place
1,293rd place
678th place
26th place
153rd place

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; German: 3rd place)

  • James A. F Stoner: Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Band 4, Nr. 4, 1. Oktober 1968, ISSN 0022-1031, S. 442–459, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(68)90069-3 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Serge Moscovici, Marisa Zavalloni: The group as a polarizer of attitudes. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 12, Nr. 2, Juni 1969, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 125–135, doi:10.1037/h0027568.
  • Colin Fraser, Celia Gouge, Michael Billig: Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization. In: European Journal of Social Psychology. Band 1, Nr. 1, 1971, ISSN 1099-0992, S. 7–30, doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010103 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Daniel J. Isenberg: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 50, Nr. 6, Juni 1986, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 1141–1151, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141.
  • Wenxuan Fu, Renqi Zhu, Shuo Liu, Xin Lu, Bo Li: A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective. In: Journalism and Media. Band 6, Nr. 3, 6. September 2025, ISSN 2673-5172, S. 144, doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 (mdpi.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Larissa Knöchelmann, J. Christopher Cohrs: Effects of intellectual humility in the context of affective polarization: Approaching and avoiding others in controversial political discussions. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 129, Nr. 1, Juli 2025, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 91–117, doi:10.1037/pspi0000462.
  • Laura G. E. Smith, Emma F. Thomas, Ana-Maria Bliuc, Craig McGarty: Polarization is the psychological foundation of collective engagement. In: Communications Psychology. Band 2, Nr. 1, 6. Mai 2024, ISSN 2731-9121, S. 41, doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00089-2, PMID 39242857, PMC 11332107 (freier Volltext) – (nature.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Daniel J. Isenberg: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 50, Nr. 6, Juni 1986, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 1141–1151, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141.
  • Eugene Burnstein, Amiram Vinokur: Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Band 13, Nr. 4, 1. Juli 1977, ISSN 0022-1031, S. 315–332, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Wenxuan Fu, Renqi Zhu, Shuo Liu, Xin Lu, Bo Li: A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective. In: Journalism and Media. Band 6, Nr. 3, 6. September 2025, ISSN 2673-5172, S. 144, doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 (mdpi.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Dominic Abrams, Margaret Wetherell, Sandra Cochrane, Michael A. Hogg, John C. Turner: Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. Band 29, Nr. 2, 1990, ISSN 2044-8309, S. 97–119, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x (wiley.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Daniel J. Isenberg: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 50, Nr. 6, Juni 1986, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 1141–1151, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141.
  • Lyn M. Van Swol: Extreme members and group polarization. In: Social Influence. Band 4, Nr. 3, 1. Juli 2009, ISSN 1553-4510, S. 185–199, doi:10.1080/15534510802584368.
  • David G. Myers, George D. Bishop: Discussion Effects on Racial Attitudes. In: Science. Band 169, Nr. 3947, 21. August 1970, S. 778–779, doi:10.1126/science.169.3947.778 (science.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Luca Iandoli, Simonetta Primario, Giuseppe Zollo: The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Band 170, 1. September 2021, ISSN 0040-1625, S. 120924, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Nadia Said, Helen Fischer, Gerrit Anders: Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize. In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Band 29, Nr. 2, 1. April 2022, ISSN 1531-5320, S. 668–680, doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y, PMID 34716563, PMC 8555729 (freier Volltext).
  • Markus Brauer, Charles M. Judd: Group Polarization and Repeated Attitude Expressions: A New Take on an Old Topic. In: European Review of Social Psychology. Band 7, Nr. 1, 1. Januar 1996, ISSN 1046-3283, S. 173–207, doi:10.1080/14792779643000010.
  • Ana-Maria Bliuc, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Kallam D. Felise: Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Band 12, 18. Oktober 2021, ISSN 1664-1078, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641215, PMID 34733195, PMC 8559783 (freier Volltext) – (frontiersin.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H. Eugene Stanley, Walter Quattrociocchi: The spreading of misinformation online. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Band 113, Nr. 3, 19. Januar 2016, S. 554–559, doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113, PMID 26729863, PMC 4725489 (freier Volltext) – (pnas.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Cass R. Sunstein: Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes. In: The Yale Law Journal. Band 110, Nr. 1, 2000, ISSN 0044-0094, S. 71–119, doi:10.2307/797587, JSTOR:797587.

frontiersin.org (Global: 4,679th place; German: 1,728th place)

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; German: 153rd place)

mdpi.com (Global: 2,912th place; German: 1,242nd place)

  • Wenxuan Fu, Renqi Zhu, Shuo Liu, Xin Lu, Bo Li: A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective. In: Journalism and Media. Band 6, Nr. 3, 6. September 2025, ISSN 2673-5172, S. 144, doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 (mdpi.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Wenxuan Fu, Renqi Zhu, Shuo Liu, Xin Lu, Bo Li: A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective. In: Journalism and Media. Band 6, Nr. 3, 6. September 2025, ISSN 2673-5172, S. 144, doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 (mdpi.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).

nature.com (Global: 234th place; German: 203rd place)

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; German: 7th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Laura G. E. Smith, Emma F. Thomas, Ana-Maria Bliuc, Craig McGarty: Polarization is the psychological foundation of collective engagement. In: Communications Psychology. Band 2, Nr. 1, 6. Mai 2024, ISSN 2731-9121, S. 41, doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00089-2, PMID 39242857, PMC 11332107 (freier Volltext) – (nature.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Nadia Said, Helen Fischer, Gerrit Anders: Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize. In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Band 29, Nr. 2, 1. April 2022, ISSN 1531-5320, S. 668–680, doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y, PMID 34716563, PMC 8555729 (freier Volltext).
  • Ana-Maria Bliuc, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Kallam D. Felise: Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Band 12, 18. Oktober 2021, ISSN 1664-1078, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641215, PMID 34733195, PMC 8559783 (freier Volltext) – (frontiersin.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H. Eugene Stanley, Walter Quattrociocchi: The spreading of misinformation online. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Band 113, Nr. 3, 19. Januar 2016, S. 554–559, doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113, PMID 26729863, PMC 4725489 (freier Volltext) – (pnas.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).

pnas.org (Global: 1,293rd place; German: 678th place)

  • Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H. Eugene Stanley, Walter Quattrociocchi: The spreading of misinformation online. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Band 113, Nr. 3, 19. Januar 2016, S. 554–559, doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113, PMID 26729863, PMC 4725489 (freier Volltext) – (pnas.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).

science.org (Global: 1,160th place; German: 2,116th place)

  • David G. Myers, George D. Bishop: Discussion Effects on Racial Attitudes. In: Science. Band 169, Nr. 3947, 21. August 1970, S. 778–779, doi:10.1126/science.169.3947.778 (science.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).

sciencedirect.com (Global: 149th place; German: 298th place)

  • James A. F Stoner: Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Band 4, Nr. 4, 1. Oktober 1968, ISSN 0022-1031, S. 442–459, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(68)90069-3 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Eugene Burnstein, Amiram Vinokur: Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Band 13, Nr. 4, 1. Juli 1977, ISSN 0022-1031, S. 315–332, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Luca Iandoli, Simonetta Primario, Giuseppe Zollo: The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Band 170, 1. September 2021, ISSN 0040-1625, S. 120924, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).

wiley.com (Global: 222nd place; German: 272nd place)

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • Colin Fraser, Celia Gouge, Michael Billig: Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization. In: European Journal of Social Psychology. Band 1, Nr. 1, 1971, ISSN 1099-0992, S. 7–30, doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010103 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Dominic Abrams, Margaret Wetherell, Sandra Cochrane, Michael A. Hogg, John C. Turner: Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. Band 29, Nr. 2, 1990, ISSN 2044-8309, S. 97–119, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x (wiley.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).

zdb-katalog.de (Global: 123rd place; German: 6th place)

  • James A. F Stoner: Risky and cautious shifts in group decisions: The influence of widely held values. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Band 4, Nr. 4, 1. Oktober 1968, ISSN 0022-1031, S. 442–459, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(68)90069-3 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Serge Moscovici, Marisa Zavalloni: The group as a polarizer of attitudes. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 12, Nr. 2, Juni 1969, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 125–135, doi:10.1037/h0027568.
  • Colin Fraser, Celia Gouge, Michael Billig: Risky shifts, cautious shifts, and group polarization. In: European Journal of Social Psychology. Band 1, Nr. 1, 1971, ISSN 1099-0992, S. 7–30, doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010103 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Daniel J. Isenberg: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 50, Nr. 6, Juni 1986, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 1141–1151, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141.
  • Wenxuan Fu, Renqi Zhu, Shuo Liu, Xin Lu, Bo Li: A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective. In: Journalism and Media. Band 6, Nr. 3, 6. September 2025, ISSN 2673-5172, S. 144, doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 (mdpi.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Larissa Knöchelmann, J. Christopher Cohrs: Effects of intellectual humility in the context of affective polarization: Approaching and avoiding others in controversial political discussions. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 129, Nr. 1, Juli 2025, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 91–117, doi:10.1037/pspi0000462.
  • Laura G. E. Smith, Emma F. Thomas, Ana-Maria Bliuc, Craig McGarty: Polarization is the psychological foundation of collective engagement. In: Communications Psychology. Band 2, Nr. 1, 6. Mai 2024, ISSN 2731-9121, S. 41, doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00089-2, PMID 39242857, PMC 11332107 (freier Volltext) – (nature.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Daniel J. Isenberg: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 50, Nr. 6, Juni 1986, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 1141–1151, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141.
  • Eugene Burnstein, Amiram Vinokur: Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Band 13, Nr. 4, 1. Juli 1977, ISSN 0022-1031, S. 315–332, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Wenxuan Fu, Renqi Zhu, Shuo Liu, Xin Lu, Bo Li: A Review of Group Polarization Research from a Dynamics Perspective. In: Journalism and Media. Band 6, Nr. 3, 6. September 2025, ISSN 2673-5172, S. 144, doi:10.3390/journalmedia6030144 (mdpi.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Dominic Abrams, Margaret Wetherell, Sandra Cochrane, Michael A. Hogg, John C. Turner: Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. In: British Journal of Social Psychology. Band 29, Nr. 2, 1990, ISSN 2044-8309, S. 97–119, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.x (wiley.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Daniel J. Isenberg: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 50, Nr. 6, Juni 1986, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 1141–1151, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141.
  • Lyn M. Van Swol: Extreme members and group polarization. In: Social Influence. Band 4, Nr. 3, 1. Juli 2009, ISSN 1553-4510, S. 185–199, doi:10.1080/15534510802584368.
  • Luca Iandoli, Simonetta Primario, Giuseppe Zollo: The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: A systematic literature review. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Band 170, 1. September 2021, ISSN 0040-1625, S. 120924, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Nadia Said, Helen Fischer, Gerrit Anders: Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize. In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Band 29, Nr. 2, 1. April 2022, ISSN 1531-5320, S. 668–680, doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y, PMID 34716563, PMC 8555729 (freier Volltext).
  • Markus Brauer, Charles M. Judd: Group Polarization and Repeated Attitude Expressions: A New Take on an Old Topic. In: European Review of Social Psychology. Band 7, Nr. 1, 1. Januar 1996, ISSN 1046-3283, S. 173–207, doi:10.1080/14792779643000010.
  • Ana-Maria Bliuc, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Kallam D. Felise: Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Band 12, 18. Oktober 2021, ISSN 1664-1078, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641215, PMID 34733195, PMC 8559783 (freier Volltext) – (frontiersin.org [abgerufen am 12. Dezember 2025]).
  • Cass R. Sunstein: Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes. In: The Yale Law Journal. Band 110, Nr. 1, 2000, ISSN 0044-0094, S. 71–119, doi:10.2307/797587, JSTOR:797587.