Griffith v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2010] NSWCA 257. In: Supreme Court of New South Wales - Court of Appeal. 7. Oktober 2010, abgerufen am 10. September 2021 (englisch): „[95] ...I would give effect to my own view that causation (in the sense explained above) was not established; and on that basis, I would hold that the defence of truth was not made out.” Also see Luck's news report: “While the three judges agreed that the program had not been justified in claiming Griffith’s book was of such poor scientific standard that it had no support at all from the scientific community, Four Corners avoided liability when the Court upheld a defence of comment.“
