Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Konzeptinventar (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Konzeptinventar" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
27doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
23zdb-katalog.de
123rd place
6th place
7aip.org
2,204th place
4,230th place
5web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
4wiley.com
222nd place
272nd place
3harvard.edu
18th place
181st place
3nih.gov
4th place
7th place
2tandfonline.com
507th place
750th place
2redirecter.toolforge.org
33rd place
2nd place
2acs.org
1,248th place
2,191st place
1umd.edu
1,747th place
1,498th place
1aps.org
1,503rd place
1,243rd place
1tu-harburg.de
low place
low place
1colorado.edu
2,526th place
5,030th place
1geosociety.org
low place
6,033rd place
1acm.org
1,185th place
2,009th place
1rsc.org
2,020th place
3,598th place
1springer.com
274th place
152nd place

acm.org

dl.acm.org

acs.org

pubs.acs.org

  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band 75, Nr. 8, August 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band 75, Nr. 8, August 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

aip.org

pubs.aip.org

  • Ibrahim Abou Halloun, David Hestenes: Common sense concepts about motion. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 53, Nr. 11, November 1985, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 1056–1065, doi:10.1119/1.14031 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, Gregg Swackhamer: Force concept inventory. In: The Physics Teacher. Band 30, Nr. 3, März 1992, ISSN 0031-921X, S. 141–158, doi:10.1119/1.2343497 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David Hestenes: Who needs physics education research!? In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 6, Juni 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 465–467, doi:10.1119/1.18898 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Douglas Huffman, Patricia Heller: What does the force concept inventory actually measure? In: The Physics Teacher. Band 33, Nr. 3, März 1995, ISSN 0031-921X, S. 138–143, doi:10.1119/1.2344171 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Richard R. Hake: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 1, Januar 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 64–74, doi:10.1119/1.18809 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ronald K. Thornton, David R. Sokoloff: Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 4, April 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 338–352, doi:10.1119/1.18863 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Robert J. Beichner: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 62, Nr. 8, August 1994, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 750–762, doi:10.1119/1.17449 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

aps.org

link.aps.org

  • Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, Robert Beichner: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. In: Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. Band 2, Nr. 1, 15. März 2006, ISSN 1554-9178, doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010105 (aps.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

colorado.edu

bioliteracy.colorado.edu

  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. 75. Jahrgang, Nr. 8. American Chemical Society (ACS), 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986–992, doi:10.1021/ed075p986, bibcode:1998JChEd..75..986W (colorado.edu [PDF]).

doi.org

  • Wendy K. Adams, Carl E. Wieman: Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band 33, Nr. 9, Juni 2011, ISSN 0950-0693, S. 1289–1312, doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David F. Treagust: Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band 10, Nr. 2, April 1988, ISSN 0950-0693, S. 159–169, doi:10.1080/0950069880100204 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ibrahim Abou Halloun, David Hestenes: Common sense concepts about motion. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 53, Nr. 11, November 1985, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 1056–1065, doi:10.1119/1.14031 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, Gregg Swackhamer: Force concept inventory. In: The Physics Teacher. Band 30, Nr. 3, März 1992, ISSN 0031-921X, S. 141–158, doi:10.1119/1.2343497 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David Hestenes: Who needs physics education research!? In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 6, Juni 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 465–467, doi:10.1119/1.18898 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Douglas Huffman, Patricia Heller: What does the force concept inventory actually measure? In: The Physics Teacher. Band 33, Nr. 3, März 1995, ISSN 0031-921X, S. 138–143, doi:10.1119/1.2344171 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Richard R. Hake: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 1, Januar 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 64–74, doi:10.1119/1.18809 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ronald K. Thornton, David R. Sokoloff: Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 4, April 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 338–352, doi:10.1119/1.18863 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, Robert Beichner: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. In: Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. Band 2, Nr. 1, 15. März 2006, ISSN 1554-9178, doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010105 (aps.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Robert J. Beichner: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 62, Nr. 8, August 1994, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 750–762, doi:10.1119/1.17449 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. 75. Jahrgang, Nr. 8. American Chemical Society (ACS), 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986–992, doi:10.1021/ed075p986, bibcode:1998JChEd..75..986W (colorado.edu [PDF]).
  • Kathy Garvin-Doxas, Michael W. Klymkowsky: Understanding Randomness and its Impact on Student Learning: Lessons Learned from Building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr. 2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 227–233, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063, PMID 18519614, PMC 2424310 (freier Volltext).
  • Charlene D'Avanzo: Biology Concept Inventories: Overview, Status, and Next Steps. In: BioScience. 58. Jahrgang, Nr. 11. Oxford University Press (OUP), 2008, ISSN 1525-3244, S. 1079–1085, doi:10.1641/b581111 (englisch).
  • Christopher D. Wilson, Charles W. Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John E. Merrill, Brett W. Merritt, Gail Richmond, Duncan F. Sibley, Joyce M. Parker: Assessing Students' Ability to Trace Matter in Dynamic Systems in Cell Biology. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 5. Jahrgang, Nr. 4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2006, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 323–331, doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142, PMID 17146039, PMC 1681358 (freier Volltext) – (englisch).
  • Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39. Jahrgang, Nr. 10. Wiley, 14. November 2002, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053, bibcode:2002JRScT..39..952A.
  • Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 45. Jahrgang, Nr. 10. Wiley, 2008, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 1131–1160, doi:10.1002/tea.20251, bibcode:2008JRScT..45.1131N (.ccny.cuny.edu (Memento des Originals vom 17. Mai 2011 im Internet Archive)).
  • Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, Jennifer K. Knight: The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr. 4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 422–430, doi:10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045, PMID 19047428, PMC 2592048 (freier Volltext).
  • J.C. Libarkin, E.M.G. Ward, S.W. Anderson, G. Kortemeyer, S.P. Raeburn: Revisiting the Geoscience Concept Inventory: A call to the community. In: GSA Today. Band 21, Nr. 8, August 2011, S. 26–28, doi:10.1130/G110GW.1 (geosociety.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ricardo Caceffo, Steve Wolfman, Kellogg S. Booth, Rodolfo Azevedo: Developing a Computer Science Concept Inventory for Introductory Programming. ACM, 2016, ISBN 978-1-4503-3685-7, S. 364–369, doi:10.1145/2839509.2844559 (acm.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Arthur Louis Odom, Lloyd H. Barrow: Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 32, Nr. 1, Januar 1995, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 45–61, doi:10.1002/tea.3660320106 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band 75, Nr. 8, August 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley: Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? In: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Band 13, Nr. 3, 2012, ISSN 1109-4028, S. 195–200, doi:10.1039/C2RP00010E (rsc.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 39, Nr. 10, Dezember 2002, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: A reply to Anderson et al. (2009). In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2009, S. n/a–n/a, doi:10.1002/tea.20330 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 45, Nr. 10, Dezember 2008, S. 1131–1160, doi:10.1002/tea.20251 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band 75, Nr. 8, August 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ross H. Nehm, Minsu Ha, Elijah Mayfield: Transforming Biology Assessment with Machine Learning: Automated Scoring of Written Evolutionary Explanations. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology. Band 21, Nr. 1, Februar 2012, ISSN 1059-0145, S. 183–196, doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9300-9 (springer.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

geosociety.org

  • J.C. Libarkin, E.M.G. Ward, S.W. Anderson, G. Kortemeyer, S.P. Raeburn: Revisiting the Geoscience Concept Inventory: A call to the community. In: GSA Today. Band 21, Nr. 8, August 2011, S. 26–28, doi:10.1130/G110GW.1 (geosociety.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Kathy Garvin-Doxas, Michael W. Klymkowsky: Understanding Randomness and its Impact on Student Learning: Lessons Learned from Building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr. 2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 227–233, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063, PMID 18519614, PMC 2424310 (freier Volltext).
  • Christopher D. Wilson, Charles W. Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John E. Merrill, Brett W. Merritt, Gail Richmond, Duncan F. Sibley, Joyce M. Parker: Assessing Students' Ability to Trace Matter in Dynamic Systems in Cell Biology. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 5. Jahrgang, Nr. 4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2006, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 323–331, doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142, PMID 17146039, PMC 1681358 (freier Volltext) – (englisch).
  • Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, Jennifer K. Knight: The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr. 4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 422–430, doi:10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045, PMID 19047428, PMC 2592048 (freier Volltext).

redirecter.toolforge.org

  • The Chemical Concepts Inventory. Visited Feb. 14, 2011. Archiviert vom Original am 18. Juli 2007; abgerufen am 30. Juli 2007.
  • Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 45. Jahrgang, Nr. 10. Wiley, 2008, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 1131–1160, doi:10.1002/tea.20251, bibcode:2008JRScT..45.1131N (.ccny.cuny.edu (Memento des Originals vom 17. Mai 2011 im Internet Archive)).

rsc.org

xlink.rsc.org

  • Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley: Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? In: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Band 13, Nr. 3, 2012, ISSN 1109-4028, S. 195–200, doi:10.1039/C2RP00010E (rsc.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

springer.com

link.springer.com

  • Ross H. Nehm, Minsu Ha, Elijah Mayfield: Transforming Biology Assessment with Machine Learning: Automated Scoring of Written Evolutionary Explanations. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology. Band 21, Nr. 1, Februar 2012, ISSN 1059-0145, S. 183–196, doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9300-9 (springer.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

tandfonline.com

  • Wendy K. Adams, Carl E. Wieman: Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band 33, Nr. 9, Juni 2011, ISSN 0950-0693, S. 1289–1312, doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David F. Treagust: Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band 10, Nr. 2, April 1988, ISSN 0950-0693, S. 159–169, doi:10.1080/0950069880100204 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

tu-harburg.de

cgi.tu-harburg.de

umd.edu

physics.umd.edu

web.archive.org

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

  • Arthur Louis Odom, Lloyd H. Barrow: Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 32, Nr. 1, Januar 1995, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 45–61, doi:10.1002/tea.3660320106 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 39, Nr. 10, Dezember 2002, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: A reply to Anderson et al. (2009). In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2009, S. n/a–n/a, doi:10.1002/tea.20330 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 45, Nr. 10, Dezember 2008, S. 1131–1160, doi:10.1002/tea.20251 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).

zdb-katalog.de

  • Wendy K. Adams, Carl E. Wieman: Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band 33, Nr. 9, Juni 2011, ISSN 0950-0693, S. 1289–1312, doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David F. Treagust: Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band 10, Nr. 2, April 1988, ISSN 0950-0693, S. 159–169, doi:10.1080/0950069880100204 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ibrahim Abou Halloun, David Hestenes: Common sense concepts about motion. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 53, Nr. 11, November 1985, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 1056–1065, doi:10.1119/1.14031 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, Gregg Swackhamer: Force concept inventory. In: The Physics Teacher. Band 30, Nr. 3, März 1992, ISSN 0031-921X, S. 141–158, doi:10.1119/1.2343497 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • David Hestenes: Who needs physics education research!? In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 6, Juni 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 465–467, doi:10.1119/1.18898 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Douglas Huffman, Patricia Heller: What does the force concept inventory actually measure? In: The Physics Teacher. Band 33, Nr. 3, März 1995, ISSN 0031-921X, S. 138–143, doi:10.1119/1.2344171 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Richard R. Hake: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 1, Januar 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 64–74, doi:10.1119/1.18809 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ronald K. Thornton, David R. Sokoloff: Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 66, Nr. 4, April 1998, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 338–352, doi:10.1119/1.18863 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, Robert Beichner: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. In: Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. Band 2, Nr. 1, 15. März 2006, ISSN 1554-9178, doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010105 (aps.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Robert J. Beichner: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. In: American Journal of Physics. Band 62, Nr. 8, August 1994, ISSN 0002-9505, S. 750–762, doi:10.1119/1.17449 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. 75. Jahrgang, Nr. 8. American Chemical Society (ACS), 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986–992, doi:10.1021/ed075p986, bibcode:1998JChEd..75..986W (colorado.edu [PDF]).
  • Kathy Garvin-Doxas, Michael W. Klymkowsky: Understanding Randomness and its Impact on Student Learning: Lessons Learned from Building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr. 2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 227–233, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063, PMID 18519614, PMC 2424310 (freier Volltext).
  • Charlene D'Avanzo: Biology Concept Inventories: Overview, Status, and Next Steps. In: BioScience. 58. Jahrgang, Nr. 11. Oxford University Press (OUP), 2008, ISSN 1525-3244, S. 1079–1085, doi:10.1641/b581111 (englisch).
  • Christopher D. Wilson, Charles W. Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John E. Merrill, Brett W. Merritt, Gail Richmond, Duncan F. Sibley, Joyce M. Parker: Assessing Students' Ability to Trace Matter in Dynamic Systems in Cell Biology. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 5. Jahrgang, Nr. 4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2006, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 323–331, doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142, PMID 17146039, PMC 1681358 (freier Volltext) – (englisch).
  • Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39. Jahrgang, Nr. 10. Wiley, 14. November 2002, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053, bibcode:2002JRScT..39..952A.
  • Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 45. Jahrgang, Nr. 10. Wiley, 2008, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 1131–1160, doi:10.1002/tea.20251, bibcode:2008JRScT..45.1131N (.ccny.cuny.edu (Memento des Originals vom 17. Mai 2011 im Internet Archive)).
  • Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, Jennifer K. Knight: The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr. 4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN 1931-7913, S. 422–430, doi:10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045, PMID 19047428, PMC 2592048 (freier Volltext).
  • Arthur Louis Odom, Lloyd H. Barrow: Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 32, Nr. 1, Januar 1995, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 45–61, doi:10.1002/tea.3660320106 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band 75, Nr. 8, August 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley: Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? In: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Band 13, Nr. 3, 2012, ISSN 1109-4028, S. 195–200, doi:10.1039/C2RP00010E (rsc.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band 39, Nr. 10, Dezember 2002, ISSN 0022-4308, S. 952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band 75, Nr. 8, August 1998, ISSN 0021-9584, S. 986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
  • Ross H. Nehm, Minsu Ha, Elijah Mayfield: Transforming Biology Assessment with Machine Learning: Automated Scoring of Written Evolutionary Explanations. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology. Band 21, Nr. 1, Februar 2012, ISSN 1059-0145, S. 183–196, doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9300-9 (springer.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).