Ricardo Caceffo, Steve Wolfman, Kellogg S. Booth, Rodolfo Azevedo: Developing a Computer Science Concept Inventory for Introductory Programming. ACM, 2016, ISBN 978-1-4503-3685-7, S.364–369, doi:10.1145/2839509.2844559 (acm.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
acs.org
pubs.acs.org
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band75, Nr.8, August 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band75, Nr.8, August 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
aip.org
pubs.aip.org
Ibrahim Abou Halloun, David Hestenes: Common sense concepts about motion. In: American Journal of Physics. Band53, Nr.11, November 1985, ISSN0002-9505, S.1056–1065, doi:10.1119/1.14031 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, Gregg Swackhamer: Force concept inventory. In: The Physics Teacher. Band30, Nr.3, März 1992, ISSN0031-921X, S.141–158, doi:10.1119/1.2343497 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David Hestenes: Who needs physics education research!? In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.6, Juni 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.465–467, doi:10.1119/1.18898 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Douglas Huffman, Patricia Heller: What does the force concept inventory actually measure? In: The Physics Teacher. Band33, Nr.3, März 1995, ISSN0031-921X, S.138–143, doi:10.1119/1.2344171 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Richard R. Hake: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.1, Januar 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.64–74, doi:10.1119/1.18809 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ronald K. Thornton, David R. Sokoloff: Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.4, April 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.338–352, doi:10.1119/1.18863 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Robert J. Beichner: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. In: American Journal of Physics. Band62, Nr.8, August 1994, ISSN0002-9505, S.750–762, doi:10.1119/1.17449 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
aps.org
link.aps.org
Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, Robert Beichner: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. In: Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. Band2, Nr.1, 15. März 2006, ISSN1554-9178, doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010105 (aps.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
colorado.edu
bioliteracy.colorado.edu
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. 75. Jahrgang, Nr.8. American Chemical Society (ACS), 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986–992, doi:10.1021/ed075p986, bibcode:1998JChEd..75..986W (colorado.edu [PDF]).
doi.org
Wendy K. Adams, Carl E. Wieman: Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band33, Nr.9, Juni 2011, ISSN0950-0693, S.1289–1312, doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David F. Treagust: Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band10, Nr.2, April 1988, ISSN0950-0693, S.159–169, doi:10.1080/0950069880100204 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ibrahim Abou Halloun, David Hestenes: Common sense concepts about motion. In: American Journal of Physics. Band53, Nr.11, November 1985, ISSN0002-9505, S.1056–1065, doi:10.1119/1.14031 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, Gregg Swackhamer: Force concept inventory. In: The Physics Teacher. Band30, Nr.3, März 1992, ISSN0031-921X, S.141–158, doi:10.1119/1.2343497 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David Hestenes: Who needs physics education research!? In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.6, Juni 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.465–467, doi:10.1119/1.18898 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Douglas Huffman, Patricia Heller: What does the force concept inventory actually measure? In: The Physics Teacher. Band33, Nr.3, März 1995, ISSN0031-921X, S.138–143, doi:10.1119/1.2344171 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Richard R. Hake: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.1, Januar 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.64–74, doi:10.1119/1.18809 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ronald K. Thornton, David R. Sokoloff: Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.4, April 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.338–352, doi:10.1119/1.18863 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, Robert Beichner: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. In: Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. Band2, Nr.1, 15. März 2006, ISSN1554-9178, doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010105 (aps.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Robert J. Beichner: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. In: American Journal of Physics. Band62, Nr.8, August 1994, ISSN0002-9505, S.750–762, doi:10.1119/1.17449 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. 75. Jahrgang, Nr.8. American Chemical Society (ACS), 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986–992, doi:10.1021/ed075p986, bibcode:1998JChEd..75..986W (colorado.edu [PDF]).
Kathy Garvin-Doxas, Michael W. Klymkowsky: Understanding Randomness and its Impact on Student Learning: Lessons Learned from Building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr.2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN1931-7913, S.227–233, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063, PMID 18519614, PMC 2424310 (freier Volltext).
Charlene D'Avanzo: Biology Concept Inventories: Overview, Status, and Next Steps. In: BioScience. 58. Jahrgang, Nr.11. Oxford University Press (OUP), 2008, ISSN1525-3244, S.1079–1085, doi:10.1641/b581111 (englisch).
Christopher D. Wilson, Charles W. Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John E. Merrill, Brett W. Merritt, Gail Richmond, Duncan F. Sibley, Joyce M. Parker: Assessing Students' Ability to Trace Matter in Dynamic Systems in Cell Biology. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 5. Jahrgang, Nr.4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2006, ISSN1931-7913, S.323–331, doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142, PMID 17146039, PMC 1681358 (freier Volltext) – (englisch).
Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39. Jahrgang, Nr.10. Wiley, 14. November 2002, ISSN0022-4308, S.952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053, bibcode:2002JRScT..39..952A.
Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, Jennifer K. Knight: The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr.4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN1931-7913, S.422–430, doi:10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045, PMID 19047428, PMC 2592048 (freier Volltext).
J.C. Libarkin, E.M.G. Ward, S.W. Anderson, G. Kortemeyer, S.P. Raeburn: Revisiting the Geoscience Concept Inventory: A call to the community. In: GSA Today. Band21, Nr.8, August 2011, S.26–28, doi:10.1130/G110GW.1 (geosociety.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ricardo Caceffo, Steve Wolfman, Kellogg S. Booth, Rodolfo Azevedo: Developing a Computer Science Concept Inventory for Introductory Programming. ACM, 2016, ISBN 978-1-4503-3685-7, S.364–369, doi:10.1145/2839509.2844559 (acm.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Arthur Louis Odom, Lloyd H. Barrow: Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band32, Nr.1, Januar 1995, ISSN0022-4308, S.45–61, doi:10.1002/tea.3660320106 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band75, Nr.8, August 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley: Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? In: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Band13, Nr.3, 2012, ISSN1109-4028, S.195–200, doi:10.1039/C2RP00010E (rsc.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band39, Nr.10, Dezember 2002, ISSN0022-4308, S.952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: A reply to Anderson et al. (2009). In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2009, S.n/a–n/a, doi:10.1002/tea.20330 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band45, Nr.10, Dezember 2008, S.1131–1160, doi:10.1002/tea.20251 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band75, Nr.8, August 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ross H. Nehm, Minsu Ha, Elijah Mayfield: Transforming Biology Assessment with Machine Learning: Automated Scoring of Written Evolutionary Explanations. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology. Band21, Nr.1, Februar 2012, ISSN1059-0145, S.183–196, doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9300-9 (springer.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
geosociety.org
J.C. Libarkin, E.M.G. Ward, S.W. Anderson, G. Kortemeyer, S.P. Raeburn: Revisiting the Geoscience Concept Inventory: A call to the community. In: GSA Today. Band21, Nr.8, August 2011, S.26–28, doi:10.1130/G110GW.1 (geosociety.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
harvard.edu
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. 75. Jahrgang, Nr.8. American Chemical Society (ACS), 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986–992, doi:10.1021/ed075p986, bibcode:1998JChEd..75..986W (colorado.edu [PDF]).
Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39. Jahrgang, Nr.10. Wiley, 14. November 2002, ISSN0022-4308, S.952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053, bibcode:2002JRScT..39..952A.
Kathy Garvin-Doxas, Michael W. Klymkowsky: Understanding Randomness and its Impact on Student Learning: Lessons Learned from Building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr.2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN1931-7913, S.227–233, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063, PMID 18519614, PMC 2424310 (freier Volltext).
Christopher D. Wilson, Charles W. Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John E. Merrill, Brett W. Merritt, Gail Richmond, Duncan F. Sibley, Joyce M. Parker: Assessing Students' Ability to Trace Matter in Dynamic Systems in Cell Biology. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 5. Jahrgang, Nr.4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2006, ISSN1931-7913, S.323–331, doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142, PMID 17146039, PMC 1681358 (freier Volltext) – (englisch).
Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, Jennifer K. Knight: The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr.4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN1931-7913, S.422–430, doi:10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045, PMID 19047428, PMC 2592048 (freier Volltext).
Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley: Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? In: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Band13, Nr.3, 2012, ISSN1109-4028, S.195–200, doi:10.1039/C2RP00010E (rsc.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
springer.com
link.springer.com
Ross H. Nehm, Minsu Ha, Elijah Mayfield: Transforming Biology Assessment with Machine Learning: Automated Scoring of Written Evolutionary Explanations. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology. Band21, Nr.1, Februar 2012, ISSN1059-0145, S.183–196, doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9300-9 (springer.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
tandfonline.com
Wendy K. Adams, Carl E. Wieman: Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band33, Nr.9, Juni 2011, ISSN0950-0693, S.1289–1312, doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David F. Treagust: Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band10, Nr.2, April 1988, ISSN0950-0693, S.159–169, doi:10.1080/0950069880100204 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Arthur Louis Odom, Lloyd H. Barrow: Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band32, Nr.1, Januar 1995, ISSN0022-4308, S.45–61, doi:10.1002/tea.3660320106 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band39, Nr.10, Dezember 2002, ISSN0022-4308, S.952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: The future of natural selection knowledge measurement: A reply to Anderson et al. (2009). In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2009, S.n/a–n/a, doi:10.1002/tea.20330 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ross H. Nehm, Irvin Sam Schonfeld: Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band45, Nr.10, Dezember 2008, S.1131–1160, doi:10.1002/tea.20251 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
zdb-katalog.de
Wendy K. Adams, Carl E. Wieman: Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band33, Nr.9, Juni 2011, ISSN0950-0693, S.1289–1312, doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.512369 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David F. Treagust: Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. In: International Journal of Science Education. Band10, Nr.2, April 1988, ISSN0950-0693, S.159–169, doi:10.1080/0950069880100204 (tandfonline.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ibrahim Abou Halloun, David Hestenes: Common sense concepts about motion. In: American Journal of Physics. Band53, Nr.11, November 1985, ISSN0002-9505, S.1056–1065, doi:10.1119/1.14031 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, Gregg Swackhamer: Force concept inventory. In: The Physics Teacher. Band30, Nr.3, März 1992, ISSN0031-921X, S.141–158, doi:10.1119/1.2343497 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
David Hestenes: Who needs physics education research!? In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.6, Juni 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.465–467, doi:10.1119/1.18898 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Douglas Huffman, Patricia Heller: What does the force concept inventory actually measure? In: The Physics Teacher. Band33, Nr.3, März 1995, ISSN0031-921X, S.138–143, doi:10.1119/1.2344171 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Richard R. Hake: Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.1, Januar 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.64–74, doi:10.1119/1.18809 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ronald K. Thornton, David R. Sokoloff: Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula. In: American Journal of Physics. Band66, Nr.4, April 1998, ISSN0002-9505, S.338–352, doi:10.1119/1.18863 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Lin Ding, Ruth Chabay, Bruce Sherwood, Robert Beichner: Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. In: Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research. Band2, Nr.1, 15. März 2006, ISSN1554-9178, doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010105 (aps.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Robert J. Beichner: Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. In: American Journal of Physics. Band62, Nr.8, August 1994, ISSN0002-9505, S.750–762, doi:10.1119/1.17449 (aip.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. 75. Jahrgang, Nr.8. American Chemical Society (ACS), 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986–992, doi:10.1021/ed075p986, bibcode:1998JChEd..75..986W (colorado.edu [PDF]).
Kathy Garvin-Doxas, Michael W. Klymkowsky: Understanding Randomness and its Impact on Student Learning: Lessons Learned from Building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr.2. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN1931-7913, S.227–233, doi:10.1187/cbe.07-08-0063, PMID 18519614, PMC 2424310 (freier Volltext).
Charlene D'Avanzo: Biology Concept Inventories: Overview, Status, and Next Steps. In: BioScience. 58. Jahrgang, Nr.11. Oxford University Press (OUP), 2008, ISSN1525-3244, S.1079–1085, doi:10.1641/b581111 (englisch).
Christopher D. Wilson, Charles W. Anderson, Merle Heidemann, John E. Merrill, Brett W. Merritt, Gail Richmond, Duncan F. Sibley, Joyce M. Parker: Assessing Students' Ability to Trace Matter in Dynamic Systems in Cell Biology. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 5. Jahrgang, Nr.4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2006, ISSN1931-7913, S.323–331, doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0142, PMID 17146039, PMC 1681358 (freier Volltext) – (englisch).
Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39. Jahrgang, Nr.10. Wiley, 14. November 2002, ISSN0022-4308, S.952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053, bibcode:2002JRScT..39..952A.
Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, Jennifer K. Knight: The Genetics Concept Assessment: A New Concept Inventory for Gauging Student Understanding of Genetics. In: CBE: Life Sciences Education. 7. Jahrgang, Nr.4. American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), 2008, ISSN1931-7913, S.422–430, doi:10.1187/cbe.08-08-0045, PMID 19047428, PMC 2592048 (freier Volltext).
Arthur Louis Odom, Lloyd H. Barrow: Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band32, Nr.1, Januar 1995, ISSN0022-4308, S.45–61, doi:10.1002/tea.3660320106 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band75, Nr.8, August 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Melanie M. Cooper, Sonia M. Underwood, Caleb Z. Hilley: Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties? In: Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Band13, Nr.3, 2012, ISSN1109-4028, S.195–200, doi:10.1039/C2RP00010E (rsc.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Dianne L. Anderson, Kathleen M. Fisher, Gregory J. Norman: Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Band39, Nr.10, Dezember 2002, ISSN0022-4308, S.952–978, doi:10.1002/tea.10053 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Bruce E. Wampold, John C. Wright, Paul H. Williams, Susan B. Millar, Steve A. Koscuik, Debra L. Penberthy: A Novel Strategy for Assessing the Effects of Curriculum Reform on Student Competence. In: Journal of Chemical Education. Band75, Nr.8, August 1998, ISSN0021-9584, S.986, doi:10.1021/ed075p986 (acs.org [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).
Ross H. Nehm, Minsu Ha, Elijah Mayfield: Transforming Biology Assessment with Machine Learning: Automated Scoring of Written Evolutionary Explanations. In: Journal of Science Education and Technology. Band21, Nr.1, Februar 2012, ISSN1059-0145, S.183–196, doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9300-9 (springer.com [abgerufen am 3. Juni 2023]).