D. Costantini, B. Borremans: The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis-based models: An evolutionary perspective. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 301, März 2019, S. 26–33, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.10.007, PMID 30342016 (Review).
U. C. Okonkwo, C. C. Ohagwu, M. E. Aronu, C. E. Okafor, C. I. Idumah, I. P. Okokpujie, N. N. Chukwu, C. E. Chukwunyelu: Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm. In: Journal of environmental radioactivity. Band 253–254, November 2022, S. 106984, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106984, PMID 36057228 (Review).
S. Sutou: Questioning the Linear No-Threshold Model (LNT): Lessons From Hiroshima/Nagasaki and Fukushima. In: Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 23, Nummer 3, 2025, S. 15593258251367588, doi:10.1177/15593258251367588, PMID 40923016, PMC 1241412 (freier Volltext) (Review).
J. J. Cardarelli, B. A. Ulsh: It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection. In: Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 16, Nummer 3, 2018 Jul-Sep, S. 1559325818779651, doi:10.1177/1559325818779651, PMID 30013457, PMC 6043938 (freier Volltext).
E. J. Calabrese, N. D. Priest, W. J. Kozumbo: Thresholds for carcinogens. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 341, Mai 2021, S. 109464, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109464, PMID 33823170 (Review).
J. E. Leblanc, J. J. Burtt: Radiation Biology and Its Role in the Canadian Radiation Protection Framework. In: Health physics. Band 117, Nummer 3, September 2019, S. 319–329, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001060, PMID 30907783 (Review).
E. J. Calabrese, P. B. Selby: Muller mistakes: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response and US EPA's cancer risk assessment policies and practices. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 383, September 2023, S. 110653, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110653, PMID 37572872 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson: Linear No-threshold (LNT) vs. Hormesis: Paradigms, Assumptions, and Mathematical Conventions that Bias the Conclusions in Favor of LNT and Against hormesis. In: Health physics. Band 116, Nummer 6, Juni 2019, S. 807–816, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001033, PMID 30768437 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson, J. A. Siegel: Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors). In: Biological theory. Band 11, 2016, S. 69–101, doi:10.1007/s13752-016-0244-4, PMID 27398078, PMC 4917595 (freier Volltext).
M. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, J. M. Kaminski: The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. In: Radiology. Band 251, Nummer 1, April 2009, S. 13–22, doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080671, PMID 19332842, PMC 2663584 (freier Volltext).
Antonella Mazzei-Abba, Christophe L. Folly, Christian Kreis, Roland A. Ammann, Cécile Adam, Eva Brack, Matthias Egger, Claudia E. Kuehni, Ben D. Spycher: External background ionizing radiation and childhood cancer: Update of a nationwide cohort analysis. In: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Band238-239, 1. November 2021, ISSN0265-931X, S.106734, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106734 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 30. Oktober 2025]).
Edward J. Calabrese: The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. In: Chem Biol Interact. 301. Jahrgang, März 2019, S.6–25, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020, PMID 30763547, bibcode:2019CBI...301....6C.
Lorenz E, Hollcroft JW, Miller E, Congdon CC, Schweisthal R: Langzeitwirkungen von akuter und chronischer Bestrahlung bei Mäusen. I. Überleben und Tumorinzidenz nach chronischer Bestrahlung von 0,11 r pro Tag. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 15. Jahrgang, Nr.4, Februar 1955, S.1049–58, doi:10.1093/jnci/15.4.1049, PMID 13233949.
Edward J. Calabrese: The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. In: Chem Biol Interact. 301. Jahrgang, März 2019, S.6–25, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020, PMID 30763547, bibcode:2019CBI...301....6C.
D. Costantini, B. Borremans: The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis-based models: An evolutionary perspective. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 301, März 2019, S. 26–33, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.10.007, PMID 30342016 (Review).
U. C. Okonkwo, C. C. Ohagwu, M. E. Aronu, C. E. Okafor, C. I. Idumah, I. P. Okokpujie, N. N. Chukwu, C. E. Chukwunyelu: Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm. In: Journal of environmental radioactivity. Band 253–254, November 2022, S. 106984, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106984, PMID 36057228 (Review).
S. Sutou: Questioning the Linear No-Threshold Model (LNT): Lessons From Hiroshima/Nagasaki and Fukushima. In: Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 23, Nummer 3, 2025, S. 15593258251367588, doi:10.1177/15593258251367588, PMID 40923016, PMC 1241412 (freier Volltext) (Review).
J. J. Cardarelli, B. A. Ulsh: It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection. In: Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 16, Nummer 3, 2018 Jul-Sep, S. 1559325818779651, doi:10.1177/1559325818779651, PMID 30013457, PMC 6043938 (freier Volltext).
E. J. Calabrese, N. D. Priest, W. J. Kozumbo: Thresholds for carcinogens. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 341, Mai 2021, S. 109464, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109464, PMID 33823170 (Review).
J. E. Leblanc, J. J. Burtt: Radiation Biology and Its Role in the Canadian Radiation Protection Framework. In: Health physics. Band 117, Nummer 3, September 2019, S. 319–329, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001060, PMID 30907783 (Review).
E. J. Calabrese, P. B. Selby: Muller mistakes: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response and US EPA's cancer risk assessment policies and practices. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 383, September 2023, S. 110653, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110653, PMID 37572872 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson: Linear No-threshold (LNT) vs. Hormesis: Paradigms, Assumptions, and Mathematical Conventions that Bias the Conclusions in Favor of LNT and Against hormesis. In: Health physics. Band 116, Nummer 6, Juni 2019, S. 807–816, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001033, PMID 30768437 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson, J. A. Siegel: Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors). In: Biological theory. Band 11, 2016, S. 69–101, doi:10.1007/s13752-016-0244-4, PMID 27398078, PMC 4917595 (freier Volltext).
M. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, J. M. Kaminski: The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. In: Radiology. Band 251, Nummer 1, April 2009, S. 13–22, doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080671, PMID 19332842, PMC 2663584 (freier Volltext).
Edward J. Calabrese: The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. In: Chem Biol Interact. 301. Jahrgang, März 2019, S.6–25, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020, PMID 30763547, bibcode:2019CBI...301....6C.
Lorenz E, Hollcroft JW, Miller E, Congdon CC, Schweisthal R: Langzeitwirkungen von akuter und chronischer Bestrahlung bei Mäusen. I. Überleben und Tumorinzidenz nach chronischer Bestrahlung von 0,11 r pro Tag. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 15. Jahrgang, Nr.4, Februar 1955, S.1049–58, doi:10.1093/jnci/15.4.1049, PMID 13233949.
Report to the Honorable Pete Domenici, U.S. Senate. (PDF; 1,31 MB) Radiation Standards – Scientific Basis Inconclusive, and EPA and NRC Disagreement Continues. In: www.gao.gov. United States General Accounting Office, 30. Juni 2000, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 23. Juli 2020; abgerufen am 16. Februar 2026 (amerikanisches Englisch).
Antonella Mazzei-Abba, Christophe L. Folly, Christian Kreis, Roland A. Ammann, Cécile Adam, Eva Brack, Matthias Egger, Claudia E. Kuehni, Ben D. Spycher: External background ionizing radiation and childhood cancer: Update of a nationwide cohort analysis. In: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Band238-239, 1. November 2021, ISSN0265-931X, S.106734, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106734 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 30. Oktober 2025]).
Strahlenschutzkommission, Grundlagen zur Begründung von Grenzwerten der Strahlenexposition für die Bevölkerung, Stellungnahme der Strahlenschutzkommission vom 8. Mai 2023, S. 42, (PDF).
Kathren RL: Historical Development of the Linear Nonthreshold Dose-Response Model as Applied to Radiation. In: University of New Hampshire Law Review. 1. Jahrgang, Nr.1, Dezember 2002 (unh.edu).
Report to the Honorable Pete Domenici, U.S. Senate. (PDF; 1,31 MB) Radiation Standards – Scientific Basis Inconclusive, and EPA and NRC Disagreement Continues. In: www.gao.gov. United States General Accounting Office, 30. Juni 2000, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 23. Juli 2020; abgerufen am 16. Februar 2026 (amerikanisches Englisch).
Antonella Mazzei-Abba, Christophe L. Folly, Christian Kreis, Roland A. Ammann, Cécile Adam, Eva Brack, Matthias Egger, Claudia E. Kuehni, Ben D. Spycher: External background ionizing radiation and childhood cancer: Update of a nationwide cohort analysis. In: Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Band238-239, 1. November 2021, ISSN0265-931X, S.106734, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106734 (sciencedirect.com [abgerufen am 30. Oktober 2025]).
