Edward J.Calabrese:The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. In: Chem Biol Interact. 301. Jahrgang, März 2019, S.6–25, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020, PMID 30763547, bibcode:2019CBI...301....6C (englisch).
D. Costantini, B. Borremans: The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis-based models: An evolutionary perspective. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 301, März 2019, S.26–33, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.10.007, PMID 30342016 (Review).
U. C. Okonkwo, C. C. Ohagwu, M. E. Aronu, C. E. Okafor, C. I. Idumah, I. P. Okokpujie, N. N. Chukwu, C. E. Chukwunyelu: Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm. In: Journal of environmental radioactivity. Band 253–254, November 2022, S.106984, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106984, PMID 36057228 (Review).
S. Sutou: Questioning the Linear No-Threshold Model (LNT): Lessons From Hiroshima/Nagasaki and Fukushima. In: Dose-response: a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 23, Nummer 3, 2025, S.15593258251367588, doi:10.1177/15593258251367588, PMID 40923016, PMC1241412(freier Volltext) (Review).
J. J. Cardarelli, B. A. Ulsh: It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection. In: Dose-response: a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 16, Nummer 3, 2018 Jul-Sep, S.1559325818779651, doi:10.1177/1559325818779651, PMID 30013457, PMC6043938(freier Volltext).
E. J. Calabrese, N. D. Priest, W. J. Kozumbo: Thresholds for carcinogens. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 341, Mai 2021, S.109464, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109464, PMID 33823170 (Review).
J. E. Leblanc, J. J. Burtt: Radiation Biology and Its Role in the Canadian Radiation Protection Framework. In: Health physics. Band 117, Nummer 3, September 2019, S.319–329, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001060, PMID 30907783 (Review).
E. J. Calabrese, P. B. Selby: Muller mistakes: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response and US EPA's cancer risk assessment policies and practices. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 383, September 2023, S.110653, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110653, PMID 37572872 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson: Linear No-threshold (LNT) vs. Hormesis: Paradigms, Assumptions, and Mathematical Conventions that Bias the Conclusions in Favor of LNT and Against hormesis. In: Health physics. Band 116, Nummer 6, Juni 2019, S.807–816, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001033, PMID 30768437 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson, J. A. Siegel: Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors). In: Biological theory. Band 11, 2016, S.69–101, doi:10.1007/s13752-016-0244-4, PMID 27398078, PMC4917595(freier Volltext).
M. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, J. M. Kaminski: The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. In: Radiology. Band 251, Nummer 1, April 2009, S.13–22, doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080671, PMID 19332842, PMC2663584(freier Volltext).
Edward J.Calabrese:The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. In: Chem Biol Interact. 301. Jahrgang, März 2019, S.6–25, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020, PMID 30763547, bibcode:2019CBI...301....6C (englisch).
Lorenz E, Hollcroft JW, Miller E, Congdon CC, Schweisthal R:Langzeitwirkungen von akuter und chronischer Bestrahlung bei Mäusen. I. Überleben und Tumorinzidenz nach chronischer Bestrahlung von 0,11 r pro Tag. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 15. Jahrgang, Nr.4, Februar 1955, S.1049–58, doi:10.1093/jnci/15.4.1049, PMID 13233949.
D. Costantini, B. Borremans: The linear no-threshold model is less realistic than threshold or hormesis-based models: An evolutionary perspective. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 301, März 2019, S.26–33, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.10.007, PMID 30342016 (Review).
U. C. Okonkwo, C. C. Ohagwu, M. E. Aronu, C. E. Okafor, C. I. Idumah, I. P. Okokpujie, N. N. Chukwu, C. E. Chukwunyelu: Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm. In: Journal of environmental radioactivity. Band 253–254, November 2022, S.106984, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106984, PMID 36057228 (Review).
S. Sutou: Questioning the Linear No-Threshold Model (LNT): Lessons From Hiroshima/Nagasaki and Fukushima. In: Dose-response: a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 23, Nummer 3, 2025, S.15593258251367588, doi:10.1177/15593258251367588, PMID 40923016, PMC1241412(freier Volltext) (Review).
J. J. Cardarelli, B. A. Ulsh: It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection. In: Dose-response: a publication of International Hormesis Society. Band 16, Nummer 3, 2018 Jul-Sep, S.1559325818779651, doi:10.1177/1559325818779651, PMID 30013457, PMC6043938(freier Volltext).
E. J. Calabrese, N. D. Priest, W. J. Kozumbo: Thresholds for carcinogens. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 341, Mai 2021, S.109464, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2021.109464, PMID 33823170 (Review).
J. E. Leblanc, J. J. Burtt: Radiation Biology and Its Role in the Canadian Radiation Protection Framework. In: Health physics. Band 117, Nummer 3, September 2019, S.319–329, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001060, PMID 30907783 (Review).
E. J. Calabrese, P. B. Selby: Muller mistakes: The linear no-threshold (LNT) dose response and US EPA's cancer risk assessment policies and practices. In: Chemico-biological interactions. Band 383, September 2023, S.110653, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110653, PMID 37572872 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson: Linear No-threshold (LNT) vs. Hormesis: Paradigms, Assumptions, and Mathematical Conventions that Bias the Conclusions in Favor of LNT and Against hormesis. In: Health physics. Band 116, Nummer 6, Juni 2019, S.807–816, doi:10.1097/HP.0000000000001033, PMID 30768437 (Review).
B. Sacks, G. Meyerson, J. A. Siegel: Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors). In: Biological theory. Band 11, 2016, S.69–101, doi:10.1007/s13752-016-0244-4, PMID 27398078, PMC4917595(freier Volltext).
M. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, J. M. Kaminski: The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. In: Radiology. Band 251, Nummer 1, April 2009, S.13–22, doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080671, PMID 19332842, PMC2663584(freier Volltext).
Edward J.Calabrese:The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations. In: Chem Biol Interact. 301. Jahrgang, März 2019, S.6–25, doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.11.020, PMID 30763547, bibcode:2019CBI...301....6C (englisch).
Lorenz E, Hollcroft JW, Miller E, Congdon CC, Schweisthal R:Langzeitwirkungen von akuter und chronischer Bestrahlung bei Mäusen. I. Überleben und Tumorinzidenz nach chronischer Bestrahlung von 0,11 r pro Tag. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 15. Jahrgang, Nr.4, Februar 1955, S.1049–58, doi:10.1093/jnci/15.4.1049, PMID 13233949.
Report to the Honorable Pete Domenici, U.S. Senate.(PDF; 1,31 MB)Radiation Standards – Scientific Basis Inconclusive, and EPA and NRC Disagreement Continues.In:gao.gov.United States General Accounting Office,30.Juni 2000,archiviertvomOriginal(nicht mehr online verfügbar)am23.Juli 2020;abgerufen am 16.Februar 2026(amerikanisches Englisch).
Strahlenschutzkommission, Grundlagen zur Begründung von Grenzwerten der Strahlenexposition für die Bevölkerung, Stellungnahme der Strahlenschutzkommission vom 8. Mai 2023, S.42, (PDF).
Kathren RL:Historical Development of the Linear Nonthreshold Dose-Response Model as Applied to Radiation. In: University of New Hampshire Law Review. 1. Jahrgang, Nr.1, Dezember 2002 (englisch, unh.edu).
Report to the Honorable Pete Domenici, U.S. Senate.(PDF; 1,31 MB)Radiation Standards – Scientific Basis Inconclusive, and EPA and NRC Disagreement Continues.In:gao.gov.United States General Accounting Office,30.Juni 2000,archiviertvomOriginal(nicht mehr online verfügbar)am23.Juli 2020;abgerufen am 16.Februar 2026(amerikanisches Englisch).