Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Linux-Distribution (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Linux-Distribution" in German language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank German rank
1211web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
1110redirecter.toolforge.org
29th place
2nd place
22linux-magazin.de
low place
2,583rd place
21howtogeek.com
8,729th place
low place
21arstechnica.com
473rd place
1,062nd place
21theguardian.com
16th place
22nd place
22android.com
4,524th place
2,640th place
11iabotmemento.invalid
low place
low place
11debian.org
3,258th place
2,334th place
11ubuntu.com
3,845th place
3,000th place
11zdnet.com
1,235th place
2,217th place
11blogspot.de
3,617th place
312th place
11gnu.org
1,901st place
1,415th place
11zdnet.de
low place
1,708th place
11all-things-android.com
low place
low place
11canalys.com
low place
low place
11nzz.ch
710th place
40th place
11statista.com
1,214th place
256th place
11pro-linux.de
low place
2,016th place
11launchpad.net
low place
9,619th place
11hemispheregames.com
low place
low place
11opengroup.org
6,630th place
4,209th place
11books.google.de
88th place
4th place
11opensuse.org
low place
6,250th place
11kuro5hin.org
low place
low place
11osnews.com
low place
low place
11techie-buzz.com
low place
low place
11youtube.com
13th place
8th place
11plus.google.com
5,148th place
8,788th place

all-things-android.com (Global: low place; German: low place)

  • Bill Anderson: Android is Just Another Distribution of Linux. Android News for Costa Rica, 13. Mai 2014, abgerufen am 12. September 2014 (englisch): „Android is not a GNU/Linux distribution, but it is a distribution of Linux. More specifically, it is a distribution of embedded Linux that uses many NetBSD utilities.“

android.com (Global: 4,524th place; German: 2,640th place)

source.android.com

developer.android.com

  • What is Android? In: Android Developers Guide. Abgerufen am 8. September 2011 (englisch).

arstechnica.com (Global: 473rd place; German: 1,062nd place)

blogspot.de (Global: 3,617th place; German: 312th place)

jeffhoogland.blogspot.de

  • Jeff Hoogland: Six Signs Android really isn’t Linux. In: jeffhoogland.blogspot.de. Thoughts on technology, 7. Juli 2011, abgerufen am 20. April 2015 (englisch). “Many people argue that Android has put Linux into the hands of millions of users. While there is no doubting that Android has been a raging success, I would argue that Google has put Android into the hands of millions of people – not Linux.”

books.google.de (Global: 88th place; German: 4th place)

  • Scott Alan Miller: Linux Administration Best Practices; Practical solutions to approaching the design and management of Linux systems. Packt Publishing, 2022, ISBN 978-1-80056-879-2, Is Linux UNIX?, S. 29 ff. (englisch, eingeschränkte Vorschau in der Google-Buchsuche): “While most operating systems built from Linux have never bothered to pay for any kind of UNIX certification, one of them recently did: EulerOS by Huawei which is built from CentOS, which in turn, is built from Fedora. Only EulerOS as a product officially carries the UNIX trademark designation, but it shows that the broader ecosystem is meeting the specifications. … In reality, the Linux and BSD ecosystems have demonstrated that the utility of the UNIX certification process has run its course and the process is now detrimental to the industry and serves no purpose. At the end of the day, being compatible with UNIX is worthless, it is Linux and BSD that other systems want to maintain compatibility with.”

canalys.com (Global: low place; German: low place)

debian.org (Global: 3,258th place; German: 2,334th place)

gnu.org (Global: 1,901st place; German: 1,415th place)

hemispheregames.com (Global: low place; German: low place)

  • Dave Burke: Porting Osmos to Linux: A Post-Mortem (part 2/3). In: hemispheregames.com. 18. Mai 2010, abgerufen am 16. Juni 2012 (englisch). “Didn’t Love: Packaging the Game. It took days of effort to create the binary packages for Osmos […] How should an app be packaged in Linux? […] There are no standards or clear answers to any of these questions. There’s no documentation for this stuff! Asking on the forums will typically net you a spectrum of answers with no consensus answer and lots of little side arguments. I basically reverse engineered what I saw other apps doing (which sadly was of little comfort because everyone does it differently). I settled on supporting .deb/.rpm/.tar.gz with explicit 32 bit and 64 bit executables […]”

howtogeek.com (Global: 8,729th place; German: low place)

  • Chris Hoffman: Android is Based on Linux, But What Does That Mean? 12. Mai 2014, abgerufen am 23. April 2015 (englisch): „Android may be based on Linux, but it’s not based on the type of Linux system you may have used on your PC. You can’t run Android apps on typical Linux distributions and you can’t run the Linux programs you’re familiar with on Android. Linux makes up the core part of Android, but Google hasn’t added all the typical software and libraries you’d find on a Linux distribution like Ubuntu. This makes all the difference.“

iabotmemento.invalid (Global: low place; German: low place)

kuro5hin.org (Global: low place; German: low place)

launchpad.net (Global: low place; German: 9,619th place)

bugs.launchpad.net

linux-magazin.de (Global: low place; German: 2,583rd place)

  • Anika Kehrer: Wieviel Linux steckt in Android? linux-magazin.de, 10. November 2009; abgerufen am 11. September 2013.
  • Robert Staudinger: Distributionsunabhängige Pakete mit Autopackage – Eines für alle. In: Linux-Magazin 2006. Nr. 2, 1. Februar 2006 (linux-magazin.de [abgerufen am 11. April 2012]). „Obwohl sie nach dem gleichen Prinzip arbeiten, laufen RPMs von Suse 9.2 nicht unter Suse 9.3 und schon gar nicht unter Red Hat. Das Autopackage-Projekt setzt auf einen einheitlichen Standard für die Erstellung von Installationspaketen. Dabei lösen die einzelnen Pakete ihre Abhängigkeiten selbst auf.“

nzz.ch (Global: 710th place; German: 40th place)

opengroup.org (Global: 6,630th place; German: 4,209th place)

opensuse.org (Global: low place; German: 6,250th place)

en.opensuse.org

osnews.com (Global: low place; German: low place)

plus.google.com (Global: 5,148th place; German: 8,788th place)

  • Ingo Molnár: Ingo Molnar. In: plus.google.com. 17. März 2012, abgerufen am 16. Juni 2012 (englisch). “So, to fix desktop Linux we need a radically different software distribution model: less of a cathedral, more of a bazaar. […] – totally flat package dependencies (i. e. a package update does not forcibly pull in other package updates) […] – a guaranteed ABI platform going forward (once a package is installed it will never break or require forced updates again). Users want to be free of update pressure from the rest of the system, if they choose to.”

pro-linux.de (Global: low place; German: 2,016th place)

redirecter.toolforge.org (Global: 29th place; German: 2nd place)

  • A Brief History of Debian – A Detailed History. Debian Documentation Team, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 23. September 2015; abgerufen am 8. August 2016.  Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft. Bitte prüfe Original- und Archivlink gemäß Anleitung und entferne dann diesen Hinweis.
  • Canonical bringt Ubuntu auf Smartphones. Archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 12. Januar 2013; abgerufen am 18. Januar 2013.
  • Jolla: Erstes Sailfish-Smartphone Ende 2013 für 400 €. chip.de, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 7. Juni 2013; abgerufen am 29. Mai 2013.
  • Tony Mobily: 2009: software installation in GNU/Linux is still broken – and a path to fixing it. In: freesoftwaremagazine.com. 23. Juni 2009, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 26. Juni 2009; abgerufen am 4. August 2011 (englisch).
  • Troy Hepfner: Linux Game Development Part 2 – Distributable Binaries. 1. Oktober 2007, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 13. Oktober 2007; abgerufen am 19. Dezember 2011 (englisch). “Creating an executable that works on almost all Linux distributions is a challenge. There are a number of factors that contribute to the problem […]”
  • Eskild Hustvedt: Playing well with distros. Linux Game Publishing, 24. November 2009, archiviert vom Original am 21. September 2011; abgerufen am 15. Januar 2012 (englisch).
  • Miguel de Icaza: Linux and Independent Software Vendors. primates.ximian.com, 4. November 2003, archiviert vom Original am 15. Juli 2012; abgerufen am 7. April 2012 (englisch). “[…] staffing requirements for maintaining and testing […] software for a dozen of distributions and release versions quickly becomes a big burden […]”
  • Eric Brown: LSB 4.0 certifications aim to heal Linux fragmentation. In: linuxfordevices.com. 8. Dezember 2010, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 24. Dezember 2013; abgerufen am 16. November 2011 (englisch). “[…] LSB helps to reduce fragmentation, it does not eliminate it. ‘The issue of packaging and broader dependencies is still a big one (for me) at least’ writes Kerner. ‘The same RPM that I get for Fedora won’t work on Ubuntu, and Ubuntu DEB packages won’t work on SUSE etc etc.’ […]”
  • Simon Peter: AppImageKit Documentation 1.0. (PDF; 38 kB) In: PortableLinuxApps.org. 2010, S. 2–3, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 29. November 2010; abgerufen am 29. Juli 2011. “Linux distributions mostly use package managers for everything. While this is perceived superior to Windows and the Mac by many Linux enthusiasts, it also creates a number of disadvantages: Centralization […], Duplication of effort […], Need to be online […], No recent apps on mature operating systems […], No way to use multiple versions in parallel […], Not easy to move an app from one machine to another […]. The AppImage format has been created with specific objectives in mind: Be distribution-agnostic […], Maintain binary compatibility […]”
  • Bruce Byfield: Autopackage struggling to gain acceptance. In: linux.com. 12. Februar 2007, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 31. März 2008; abgerufen am 21. Januar 2012 (englisch). “If Hearn is correct, the real lesson of Autopackage is not how to improve software installation, but the difficulty – perhaps the impossibility – of large-scale changes in Linux architecture this late in its history. It’s a sobering, disappointing conclusion to a project that once seemed so promising.”

statista.com (Global: 1,214th place; German: 256th place)

de.statista.com

techie-buzz.com (Global: low place; German: low place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16th place; German: 22nd place)

ubuntu.com (Global: 3,845th place; German: 3,000th place)

wiki.ubuntu.com

  • Releases. In: Ubuntu Wiki. Canonical, abgerufen am 8. August 2016.

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; German: 1st place)

  • A Brief History of Debian – A Detailed History. Debian Documentation Team, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 23. September 2015; abgerufen am 8. August 2016.  Info: Der Archivlink wurde automatisch eingesetzt und noch nicht geprüft. Bitte prüfe Original- und Archivlink gemäß Anleitung und entferne dann diesen Hinweis.
  • Canonical bringt Ubuntu auf Smartphones. Archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 12. Januar 2013; abgerufen am 18. Januar 2013.
  • Jolla: Erstes Sailfish-Smartphone Ende 2013 für 400 €. chip.de, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 7. Juni 2013; abgerufen am 29. Mai 2013.
  • Kennzahlen zum Mobile-Markt von Business Insider (Memento vom 27. Mai 2012 im Internet Archive), 15. April 2012, Alexander Oschatz, Radenbul, zugegriffen: 19. Juni 2012.
  • Tony Mobily: 2009: software installation in GNU/Linux is still broken – and a path to fixing it. In: freesoftwaremagazine.com. 23. Juni 2009, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 26. Juni 2009; abgerufen am 4. August 2011 (englisch).
  • Troy Hepfner: Linux Game Development Part 2 – Distributable Binaries. 1. Oktober 2007, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 13. Oktober 2007; abgerufen am 19. Dezember 2011 (englisch). “Creating an executable that works on almost all Linux distributions is a challenge. There are a number of factors that contribute to the problem […]”
  • Eskild Hustvedt: Playing well with distros. Linux Game Publishing, 24. November 2009, archiviert vom Original am 21. September 2011; abgerufen am 15. Januar 2012 (englisch).
  • Miguel de Icaza: Linux and Independent Software Vendors. primates.ximian.com, 4. November 2003, archiviert vom Original am 15. Juli 2012; abgerufen am 7. April 2012 (englisch). “[…] staffing requirements for maintaining and testing […] software for a dozen of distributions and release versions quickly becomes a big burden […]”
  • Eric Brown: LSB 4.0 certifications aim to heal Linux fragmentation. In: linuxfordevices.com. 8. Dezember 2010, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 24. Dezember 2013; abgerufen am 16. November 2011 (englisch). “[…] LSB helps to reduce fragmentation, it does not eliminate it. ‘The issue of packaging and broader dependencies is still a big one (for me) at least’ writes Kerner. ‘The same RPM that I get for Fedora won’t work on Ubuntu, and Ubuntu DEB packages won’t work on SUSE etc etc.’ […]”
  • Simon Peter: AppImageKit Documentation 1.0. (PDF; 38 kB) In: PortableLinuxApps.org. 2010, S. 2–3, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 29. November 2010; abgerufen am 29. Juli 2011. “Linux distributions mostly use package managers for everything. While this is perceived superior to Windows and the Mac by many Linux enthusiasts, it also creates a number of disadvantages: Centralization […], Duplication of effort […], Need to be online […], No recent apps on mature operating systems […], No way to use multiple versions in parallel […], Not easy to move an app from one machine to another […]. The AppImage format has been created with specific objectives in mind: Be distribution-agnostic […], Maintain binary compatibility […]”
  • Bruce Byfield: Autopackage struggling to gain acceptance. In: linux.com. 12. Februar 2007, archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 31. März 2008; abgerufen am 21. Januar 2012 (englisch). “If Hearn is correct, the real lesson of Autopackage is not how to improve software installation, but the difficulty – perhaps the impossibility – of large-scale changes in Linux architecture this late in its history. It’s a sobering, disappointing conclusion to a project that once seemed so promising.”

youtube.com (Global: 13th place; German: 8th place)

zdnet.com (Global: 1,235th place; German: 2,217th place)

  • Adrian Kingsley-Hughes: The death of the Linux distro. In: The death of the Linux distro. CBS Interactive, 14. Februar 2012, abgerufen am 19. September 2012 (englisch). “Take a look at how Android has become the dominant Linux distro on mobile platforms. […] So again, while B2G is essentially a Linux distro, people will come […]”

zdnet.de (Global: low place; German: 1,708th place)