Robert H. Bork: The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. Free Press, 1989, ISBN 0-02-903761-1, S.44 (archive.org).
books.google.com
David Bernstein: Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, and the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal. Duke University Press, 2001, S. 100: "The Court also directly overturned Lochner by adding that it is no 'longer open to question that it is within the legislative power to fix maximum hours.'" (books.google.com)
Michael Dorf, Trevor Morrison: Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, 2010, S. 18. (books.google.com)
John Patrick: The Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion. Oxford University Press, 2006, S. 362. (books.google.com)
David E. Bernstein: Rehabilitating Lochner: Defending Individual Rights Against Progressive Reform. University of Chicago Press, 2011, ISBN 978-0-226-04353-1 (google.com).
Ian Millhiser: Rand Paul praises horrendous Supreme Court decision, would let employers ruthlessly exploit workers. In: ThinkProgress. 7. März 2013. (thinkprogress.org)
web.archive.org
Robert H. Bork: The Judge's Role in Law and Culture. In: Ave Maria Law Review. Band1, 2003, S.19, 21 (archive.org [PDF; abgerufen am 28. Mai 2013]).
Judicial Throwback. Archiviert vom Original (nicht mehr online verfügbar) am 29. April 2012; abgerufen am 3. Juli 2012.
Ian Millhiser described as "Worse Than Lochner" constitutional interpretation that would hold unconstitutional all affirmative action policies as well as Social Security, Medicare, and Pell Grants. Ian Millhiser: Worse Than Lochner. In: Yale Law & Policy Review. Band29, Juni 2011 (yale.edu).
