Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

Marshallsche Nachfragefunktion (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Marshallsche Nachfragefunktion" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
6jstor.org
26th place
153rd place
5doi.org
2nd place
3rd place
1princeton.edu
741st place
1,038th place
1archive.org
6th place
40th place

archive.org

doi.org

  • Vgl. James C. Moore: General equilibrium and welfare economics. An introduction. Springer, Berlin u. a. 2007, ISBN 978-3-540-31407-3 (auch online: doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32223-8), S. 88.
  • Dazu vgl. etwa James C. Moore: General equilibrium and welfare economics. An introduction. Springer, Berlin u. a. 2007, ISBN 978-3-540-31407-3 (auch online: doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32223-8), Kapitel 4; Ariel Rubinstein: Lecture Notes in Microeconomic Theory. Lecture 5. Internet http://press.princeton.edu/rubinstein/lecture5.pdf, abgerufen am 6. Mai 2014.
  • Dazu Donald A. Walker: Walras, Léon (1834–1910). In: Steven N. Durlauf und Lawrence E. Blume (Hrsg.): The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2. Auflage. Palgrave Macmillan 2008, doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1814 (Online-Ausgabe); Donald A. Walker: Walras’s market models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, ISBN 9780521022958, S. 41.
  • Dazu ausführlicher William Jaffé: Léon Walras's Role in the “Marginal Revolution” of the 1870s. In: History of Political Economy. 4, Nr. 2, 1972, doi:10.1215/00182702-4-2-379, S. 379–405, hier S. 397 f.
  • Zur Beziehung dieser Beiträge zu Slutsky (1915) vgl. R. G. D. Allen: Professor Slutsky’s Theory of Consumers’ Choice. In: Review of Economic Studies. 3, Nr. 2, 1936, S. 120–129, doi:10.2307/2967502. Zur Entstehungs- und Rezeptionsgeschichte von Slutsky (1915) vgl. John S. Chipman und Jean-Sébastien Lenfant: Slutsky’s 1915 Article: How It Came to Be Found and Interpreted. In: History of Political Economy. 34, Nr. 3, 2002, S. 553–597, doi:10.1215/00182702-34-3-553.

jstor.org

  • Donald W. Katzner: A Note on the Differentiability of Consumer Demand Functions. In: Econometrica. 36, Nr. 2, 1968, S. 415–418 (JSTOR:1907498).
  • Vgl. Christian E. Weber: Pareto and the 53% Ordinal Theory of Utility. In: History of Political Economy. 33, Nr. 3, 2001, S. 541–576; George J. Stigler: The Development of Utility Theory. II. In: Journal of Political Economy. 58, Nr. 5, 1950, S. 373–396 (JSTOR:1825710), hier S. 380 f.
  • Vgl. George J. Stigler: The Development of Utility Theory. II. In: Journal of Political Economy. 58, Nr. 5, 1950, S. 373–396 (JSTOR:1825710); Roberto Marchionatti und Enrico Gambino: Pareto and Political Economy as a Science: Methodological Revolution and Analytical Advances in Economic Theory in the 1890s. In: Journal of Political Economy. 105, Nr. 6, 1997, S. 1322–1348 (JSTOR), hier S. 1335 f.
  • Dazu auch Peter C. Dooley: Consumer’s Surplus: Marshall and His Critics. In: The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique. 16, Nr. 1, 1983, S. 26–38 (JSTOR:134973), S. 28 ff.; speziell zur Kontroverse mit Pareto: E. B. Wilson: Pareto Versus Marshall. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 53, Nr. 4, 1939, S. 645–650 (JSTOR:1883289).
  • John R. Hicks und R. G. D. Allen: A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value. Part I. In: Economica. 1, Nr. 1, 1934, S. 52–76 (JSTOR:2548574).
  • John R. Hicks und R. G. D. Allen: A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value. Part II. A Mathematical Theory of Individual Demand Functions In: Economica. 1, Nr. 2, 1934, S. 196–219 (JSTOR:2548749).

princeton.edu

press.princeton.edu