Menschliche Geschlechtsunterschiede (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Menschliche Geschlechtsunterschiede" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
2nd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
123rd place
6th place
4th place
7th place
2,106th place
139th place
low place
low place
576th place
1,137th place
68th place
29th place
340th place
525th place
2,263rd place
1,625th place
222nd place
272nd place
2,747th place
1,415th place
6,828th place
4,316th place
485th place
715th place
1,950th place
300th place
2,478th place
175th place
low place
low place
low place
1,786th place
813th place
69th place
low place
low place
317th place
14th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,067th place
2,868th place
14th place
31st place
687th place
41st place
6,283rd place
471st place
267th place
15th place
3,867th place
5,127th place
2,144th place
142nd place
3,043rd place
200th place
195th place
255th place
9,649th place
865th place
2,705th place
261st place
2,494th place
1,686th place
low place
low place
8th place
37th place
865th place
132nd place
201st place
11th place
low place
low place
6,295th place
4,768th place
9,827th place
681st place

aargauerzeitung.ch

aerzteblatt.de

annualreviews.org

  • Janet Shibley Hyde: Gender Similarities and Differences. In: Annual Review of Psychology. Band 65, Nr. 1, 3. Januar 2014, ISSN 0066-4308, 3.18: GENDER DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES IN VARIABILITY, S. 373–398, doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057 (englisch, annualreviews.org [abgerufen am 2. Juli 2020]): “For mathematics performance, across three meta-analyses and a wide variety of samples, vari- ance ratios consistently range between 1.05 and 1.20. Males display more variability, but the variance ratios are not very far from 1.0, i.e., the variances are not radically different. Similarly, for verbal performance, variance ratios range between 1.03 and 1.16.” Gender Similarities and Differences (Memento vom 20. November 2021 im Internet Archive)

arbeitsinspektion.gv.at

archive.today

arte.tv

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

  • Illiteracy 'hinders world's poor'. 9. November 2005 (bbc.co.uk [abgerufen am 31. August 2024]).

bgm-ag.ch

  • Dieter Schmitter, Ulf Steinberg, Detlef Trippler, Michael Wichtl: Manuelle Lastenhandhabung – Heben, Halten, Tragen, Ziehen, Schieben. In: Internationale Vereinigung für Soziale Sicherheit (Hrsg.): Leitfaden für die Gefährdungsbeurteilung in Klein- und Mittelbetrieben. Band 6. VerlagTechnik&Informatione.K., Bochum 2010, ISBN 978-3-941441-57-6 (Online [PDF; 747 kB; abgerufen am 26. November 2021]).

bgsu.edu

  • Nina G. Jablonski, George Chaplin: The evolution of human skin coloration. In: Journal of Human Evolution. Vol. 39, Nr. 1, Juli 2000, S. 57–106, doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0403 (englisch, bgsu.edu [PDF; 3,0 MB; abgerufen am 5. Juni 2013] PDF; 3,2 MB).

biomedcentral.com

bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com

  • Robin M Daly, Bjorn E Rosengren, Gayani Alwis, Henrik G Ahlborg, Ingemar Sernbo, Magnus K Karlsson: Gender specific age-related changes in bone density, muscle strength and functional performance in the elderly: a-10 year prospective population-based study. In: BMC Geriatrics. Band 13, Nr. 1, Dezember 2013, ISSN 1471-2318, S. 71, doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-71, PMID 23829776, PMC 3716823 (freier Volltext) – (biomedcentral.com [abgerufen am 6. März 2023]).

bjs.gov

bmas.de

bmi.gv.at

deadurl.invalid

destatis.de

deutschlandfunkkultur.de

dguv.de

publikationen.dguv.de

doi.org

  • Jeri W Nieves, Carmelo Formica, Jamie Ruffing, Marsha Zion, Patricia Garrett, Robert Lindsay, Felicia Cosman: Males Have Larger Skeletal Size and Bone Mass Than Females, Despite Comparable Body Size. In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Band 20, Nr. 3, 11. Oktober 2004, S. 529–535, doi:10.1359/JBMR.041005 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 6. März 2023]).
  • Robin M Daly, Bjorn E Rosengren, Gayani Alwis, Henrik G Ahlborg, Ingemar Sernbo, Magnus K Karlsson: Gender specific age-related changes in bone density, muscle strength and functional performance in the elderly: a-10 year prospective population-based study. In: BMC Geriatrics. Band 13, Nr. 1, Dezember 2013, ISSN 1471-2318, S. 71, doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-71, PMID 23829776, PMC 3716823 (freier Volltext) – (biomedcentral.com [abgerufen am 6. März 2023]).
  • Miriam A. Bredella: Sex Differences in Body Composition. In: Sex and Gender Factors Affecting Metabolic Homeostasis, Diabetes and Obesity. Springer International Publishing, Cham 2017, ISBN 978-3-319-70178-3, S. 9–27, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_2.
  • Ian W. Craig, Emma Harper, Caroline S. Loat: The Genetic Basis for Sex Differences in Human Behaviour: Role of the Sex Chromosomes. In: Annals of Human Genetics. Vol. 68, Nr. 3, 2004, S. 269–284, doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2004.00098.x (englisch).
  • Nina G. Jablonski, George Chaplin: The evolution of human skin coloration. In: Journal of Human Evolution. Vol. 39, Nr. 1, Juli 2000, S. 57–106, doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0403 (englisch, bgsu.edu [PDF; 3,0 MB; abgerufen am 5. Juni 2013] PDF; 3,2 MB).
  • Patrick Sulem et al.: Genetic determinants of hair, eye and skin pigmentation in Europeans. In: Nature Genetics. Band 39, 2007, S. 1443–1452, doi:10.1038/ng.2007.13 (englisch).
  • K. Krishan, T. Kanchan, N. Passi, J. A. DiMaggio: Sexual dimorphism in foot length ratios among North Indian adolescents. In: Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2015, doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.007, PMID 26414875.
  • M. Voracek, M. L. Fisher, B. Rupp, D. Lucas, D. M. Fessler: Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings. In: Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2007, doi:10.2466/pms.104.4.1123-1138, PMID 17879647.
  • Janet Shibley Hyde: Gender Similarities and Differences. In: Annual Review of Psychology. Band 65, Nr. 1, 3. Januar 2014, ISSN 0066-4308, 3.18: GENDER DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES IN VARIABILITY, S. 373–398, doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057 (englisch, annualreviews.org [abgerufen am 2. Juli 2020]): “For mathematics performance, across three meta-analyses and a wide variety of samples, vari- ance ratios consistently range between 1.05 and 1.20. Males display more variability, but the variance ratios are not very far from 1.0, i.e., the variances are not radically different. Similarly, for verbal performance, variance ratios range between 1.03 and 1.16.” Gender Similarities and Differences (Memento vom 20. November 2021 im Internet Archive)
  • Bariş O. Yildirim, Jan J. L. Derksen: A review on the relationship between testosterone and life-course persistent antisocial behavior. In: Psychiatry Research. Band 200, Nr. 2–3, Dezember 2012, S. 984–1010, doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.07.044.
  • Yanna J. Weisberg, Colin G. DeYoung, Jacob B. Hirsh: Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Band 2, 1. August 2011, ISSN 1664-1078, S. 178, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178, PMID 21866227, PMC 3149680 (freier Volltext) – (PMC3149680 [abgerufen am 25. August 2024]).
  • Richard A. Lippa: Gender Differences in Personality and Interests: When, Where, and Why? In: Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Vol. 4, Nr. 11, November 2010, S. 1098–1110, doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00320.x (englisch).
  • Paul T. Costa, Antonio Terracciano, Robert R. McCrae: Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 81, Nr. 2, August 2001, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 322–331, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.
  • Alice H. Eagly, Wendy Wood: The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. In: American Psychologist. Band 54, Nr. 6, Juni 1999, S. 408–423, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408 (englisch).
  • WHO – Bulletin of the World Health Organization – Brenda J. van den Bergh, Alex Gatherer, Andrew Fraser, Lars Moller: mprisonment and women’s health: concerns about gender sensitivity, human rights and public health. In: Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2011, Nr. 89, S. 689–694, doi:10.2471/BLT.10.082842; Abschnitt: Profile of women prisoners; Zitat: “in about 80 % of prison systems worldwide, the proportion of women varies between 2 % and 9 % with a median of 4.3 % in 2006.”
  • Giulia Franceschini, Silvia Galli, Francesca Chiesi, Caterina Primi: Implicit gender–math stereotype and women's susceptibility to stereotype threat and stereotype lift. In: Learning and Individual Differences. Band 32, Nummer , 2014, S. 273–277, doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.020.

ed.gov

nces.ed.gov

europa.eu

osha.europa.eu

commission.europa.eu

ey.com

genderatlas.at

google.de

books.google.de

hindawi.com

lasi-info.com

  • Länderausschuss für Arbeitsschutz und Sicherheitstechnik (Hrsg.): Handlungsanleitung zur Beurteilung der Arbeitsbedingungen beim Ziehen und Schieben von Lasten. LV 29. Saarbrücken 2002, ISBN 3-936415-25-0, S. 21 (lasi-info.com [PDF; 1,7 MB; abgerufen am 8. Dezember 2015]).

mementoweb.org

timetravel.mementoweb.org

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Robin M Daly, Bjorn E Rosengren, Gayani Alwis, Henrik G Ahlborg, Ingemar Sernbo, Magnus K Karlsson: Gender specific age-related changes in bone density, muscle strength and functional performance in the elderly: a-10 year prospective population-based study. In: BMC Geriatrics. Band 13, Nr. 1, Dezember 2013, ISSN 1471-2318, S. 71, doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-71, PMID 23829776, PMC 3716823 (freier Volltext) – (biomedcentral.com [abgerufen am 6. März 2023]).
  • K. Krishan, T. Kanchan, N. Passi, J. A. DiMaggio: Sexual dimorphism in foot length ratios among North Indian adolescents. In: Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2015, doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2015.09.007, PMID 26414875.
  • M. Voracek, M. L. Fisher, B. Rupp, D. Lucas, D. M. Fessler: Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings. In: Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2007, doi:10.2466/pms.104.4.1123-1138, PMID 17879647.
  • Yanna J. Weisberg, Colin G. DeYoung, Jacob B. Hirsh: Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Band 2, 1. August 2011, ISSN 1664-1078, S. 178, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178, PMID 21866227, PMC 3149680 (freier Volltext) – (PMC3149680 [abgerufen am 25. August 2024]).

nzz.ch

oup.com

academic.oup.com

ourworldindata.org

  • Max Roser, Cameron Appel, Hannah Ritchie: Human Height. In: Our World in Data. 8. Oktober 2013 (ourworldindata.org [abgerufen am 5. März 2023]).

parlament.gv.at

si.edu

naturalhistory.si.edu

tz.de

unodc.org

vol.at

washington.edu

faculty.washington.edu

  • Nina G. Jablonski, George Chaplin: The evolution of human skin coloration. In: Journal of Human Evolution. Vol. 39, Nr. 1, Juli 2000, S. 57–106, doi:10.1006/jhev.2000.0403 (englisch, bgsu.edu [PDF; 3,0 MB; abgerufen am 5. Juni 2013] PDF; 3,2 MB).

web.archive.org

welt.de

who.int

wiley.com

doi.wiley.com

  • Jeri W Nieves, Carmelo Formica, Jamie Ruffing, Marsha Zion, Patricia Garrett, Robert Lindsay, Felicia Cosman: Males Have Larger Skeletal Size and Bone Mass Than Females, Despite Comparable Body Size. In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. Band 20, Nr. 3, 11. Oktober 2004, S. 529–535, doi:10.1359/JBMR.041005 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 6. März 2023]).

worksafenb.ca

zdb-katalog.de

  • Robin M Daly, Bjorn E Rosengren, Gayani Alwis, Henrik G Ahlborg, Ingemar Sernbo, Magnus K Karlsson: Gender specific age-related changes in bone density, muscle strength and functional performance in the elderly: a-10 year prospective population-based study. In: BMC Geriatrics. Band 13, Nr. 1, Dezember 2013, ISSN 1471-2318, S. 71, doi:10.1186/1471-2318-13-71, PMID 23829776, PMC 3716823 (freier Volltext) – (biomedcentral.com [abgerufen am 6. März 2023]).
  • Susanne Schäfer: Hormon: Testosteron macht männlich, aber nicht aggressiv. In: Die Zeit. 23. September 2015, ISSN 0044-2070 (zeit.de [abgerufen am 27. August 2024]).
  • Janet Shibley Hyde: Gender Similarities and Differences. In: Annual Review of Psychology. Band 65, Nr. 1, 3. Januar 2014, ISSN 0066-4308, 3.18: GENDER DIFFERENCES AND SIMILARITIES IN VARIABILITY, S. 373–398, doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057 (englisch, annualreviews.org [abgerufen am 2. Juli 2020]): “For mathematics performance, across three meta-analyses and a wide variety of samples, vari- ance ratios consistently range between 1.05 and 1.20. Males display more variability, but the variance ratios are not very far from 1.0, i.e., the variances are not radically different. Similarly, for verbal performance, variance ratios range between 1.03 and 1.16.” Gender Similarities and Differences (Memento vom 20. November 2021 im Internet Archive)
  • Yanna J. Weisberg, Colin G. DeYoung, Jacob B. Hirsh: Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Band 2, 1. August 2011, ISSN 1664-1078, S. 178, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178, PMID 21866227, PMC 3149680 (freier Volltext) – (PMC3149680 [abgerufen am 25. August 2024]).
  • Paul T. Costa, Antonio Terracciano, Robert R. McCrae: Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Band 81, Nr. 2, August 2001, ISSN 1939-1315, S. 322–331, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322.

zeit.de

  • Susanne Schäfer: Hormon: Testosteron macht männlich, aber nicht aggressiv. In: Die Zeit. 23. September 2015, ISSN 0044-2070 (zeit.de [abgerufen am 27. August 2024]).