Kent Ratajeski: The Cretaceous Superplume. Beitrag zu All Things Cretaceous: A Digital Resource Collection for Teaching and Learning des Science Education Resource Center (SERC), Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota.
doi.org
Gillian R. Foulger, J. Godfrey Fitton, Dean C. Presnall, W. Jason Morgan: The great plume debate. In: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. Band87, Nr.7, 2006, ISSN0096-3941, S.76, doi:10.1029/2006EO070004 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 28. Juni 2023]).
Ian H. Campbell, Andrew C. Kerr: The Great Plume Debate: Testing the plume theory. In: Chemical Geology. Band241, Nr.3-4, Juli 2007, S.149–152, doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.01.013 (elsevier.com [abgerufen am 28. Juni 2023]).
A. Davaille, J. Vatteville: On the transient nature of mantle plumes. In: Geophysical Research Letters. Bd. 32, 2005, doi:10.1029/2005GL023029.
L.P. Vinnik, V. Farra, R. Kind: Deep structure of the Afro-Arabian hotspot by S receiver functions. In: Geophysikal Research Letters. Bd. 31, 2004, doi:10.1029/2004GL019574.
Li u. a.: Seismic observation of narrow plumes in the oceanic upper mantle. In: Geophysical Research Letters. Bd. 30, 2003, doi:10.1029/2002GL015411.
J. van Hunen, S. Zhong: New insight in the Hawaiian plume swell dynamics from scaling laws. In: Geophysical Research Letters. Bd. 30, 2003, doi:10.1029/2003GL017646.
E. Tan, M. Gurnis, L. Han: Slabs in the lower mantle and their modulation of plume formation. In: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. Bd. 3, 1067, 2002, doi:10.1029/2001GC000238.
Ian H. Campbell, Andrew C. Kerr: The Great Plume Debate: Testing the plume theory. In: Chemical Geology. Band241, Nr.3-4, Juli 2007, S.149–152, doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.01.013 (elsevier.com [abgerufen am 28. Juni 2023]).
Gillian R. Foulger: Plates vs. plumes: a geological controversy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester 2010, ISBN 978-1-4051-6148-0 (wiley-vch.de): „Since the advent of the mantle plume hypothesis in 1971, scientists have been faced with the problem that its predictions are not confirmed by observation. For thirty years, the usual reaction has been to adapt the hypothesis in numerous ways. As a result, the multitude of current plume variants now amounts to an unfalsifiable hypothesis.“
wiley.com
doi.wiley.com
Gillian R. Foulger, J. Godfrey Fitton, Dean C. Presnall, W. Jason Morgan: The great plume debate. In: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. Band87, Nr.7, 2006, ISSN0096-3941, S.76, doi:10.1029/2006EO070004 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 28. Juni 2023]).
zdb-katalog.de
Hetu C. Sheth: The great plume debate. In: Current Science. Band89, Nr.10, 2005, ISSN0011-3891, S.1659–1661.
Gillian R. Foulger, J. Godfrey Fitton, Dean C. Presnall, W. Jason Morgan: The great plume debate. In: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union. Band87, Nr.7, 2006, ISSN0096-3941, S.76, doi:10.1029/2006EO070004 (wiley.com [abgerufen am 28. Juni 2023]).
R. Montelli u. a.: A catalogue of deep mantle plumes: New results from finite-frequency tomography. In: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. Bd. 7, 2006, ISSN1525-2027.
R.C. Kerr, C. Mériaux: Structure and dynamics of sheared mantle plumes. In: Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. Bd. 5, 2004, ISSN1525-2027.
