Ukraine und die Europäische Union (German Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ukraine und die Europäische Union" in German language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank German rank
1st place
1st place
226th place
12th place
884th place
51st place
240th place
13th place
2nd place
3rd place
1,466th place
97th place
68th place
29th place
49th place
151st place
201st place
11th place
66th place
4th place
267th place
15th place
687th place
41st place
99th place
323rd place
2,679th place
179th place
123rd place
6th place
low place
1,843rd place
1,885th place
1,114th place
low place
low place
743rd place
45th place
4,320th place
253rd place
9,526th place
666th place
1,850th place
131st place
1,065th place
65th place
1,487th place
95th place
204th place
145th place
418th place
22nd place
low place
703rd place
2,072nd place
9,578th place
low place
1,738th place
23rd place
98th place
612th place
686th place
1,243rd place
75th place
269th place
601st place
3,287th place
2,230th place
1,069th place
59th place

bloomberg.com

bmlv.gv.at

derstandard.at

derwesten.de

diepresse.com

doi.org

  • Gunta Pastore: The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement prior to the Vilnius Eastern Partnership Summit. In: TalTech Journal of European Studies. Band 4, Nr. 2, Oktober 2014, S. 5–19, doi:10.2478/bjes-2014-0012 (englisch): “In the EU debate, a group of ‘maximalists’—the Eastern European Member States, Poland, the Baltic countries, to some extent the Nordic countries and the UK—pushed for the EU’s engagement in Ukraine. They argued that Ukraine is a key for Europe. Therefore the EU should not isolate it, allowing it to fall under Russia’s influence. The EU should act strategically and engage in Ukraine despite Yanukovych’s lack of reforms. Especially, the former Soviet countries among the EU Member States insisted on a tougher line towards Russia’s influence in Ukraine. The most prominent role was adopted by Poland. Poland also seemed to be the main beneficiary of the AA, as its goods would be able to gain a strong market share in Ukraine.”
  • Gunta Pastore: The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement prior to the Vilnius Eastern Partnership Summit. In: TalTech Journal of European Studies. Band 4, Nr. 2, Oktober 2014, S. 5–19, doi:10.2478/bjes-2014-0012 (englisch): “On the other side in the EU debate were the ‘minimalists’—Germany, France, Spain, and Italy. The southern countries were traditionally reluctant. The crucial aspect here is the fact that the relations between Ukraine and the most influential EU Member States—France and Germany—have always been attached to their relations with Russia (Youngs, 2011, p. 32). Germany has been desperate to avoid confrontation with Russia, its strategic partner (Barkin, 2014.) The same applies for France and the southern Member States. It cannot be ruled out that for some Member States the negative trends in Ukraine served as an excuse to delay signing the AA, which was strongly opposed by Russia. This way they could ease profitable bilateral deals with Russia. Reluctance of these states was reflected in the balanced EU policy vis-à-vis Ukraine.”
  • Thomas Vogel: Wie weiter? Das Assoziierungsabkommen der EU im Spannungsfeld von Wirtschaft und Menschenrechten. In: Ukraine-Analysen. Nr. 103, 8. Mai 2012, S. 2–6, doi:10.31205/UA.103.01.

dw-world.de

dw.com

euractiv.de

euronews.com

de.euronews.com

europa.eu

eeas.europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

faz.net

handelsblatt.com

laender-analysen.de

lr-online.de

newsweek.com

nzz.ch

orf.at

ost-ausschuss.de

reuters.com

rnd.de

spiegel.de

srf.ch

sueddeutsche.de

t-online.de

tagblatt-wienerzeitung.at

tagesschau.de

twitter.com

ukrinform.net

ukrinform.ua

web.archive.org

welt.de

zdb-katalog.de

  • Thomas Gutschker: Appell im EU-Parlament: „Beweisen Sie, dass Sie Europäer sind“. In: FAZ.NET. ISSN 0174-4909 (faz.net [abgerufen am 29. Januar 2023]).

zdf.de

zeit.de