«ΑΣΚΤ – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015.[νεκρός σύνδεσμος]"Specific POSITIVE points: Excellent facilities both in terms of office space but also laboratories. Excellent International Reputation that should be retained and expanded. High expertise of academic staff in the disciplines they teach and practise and good standards of students. Very good connections with the cultural and social organizations of the country. An excellent network of art stations/residency (labs) in very inspiring locations (e.g. Ydra, Myconos, Delphi, Rethimno etc) across Greece open also to international artists. Specific NEGATIVE points: Due to current lab membership structure, students are not exposed to experiences of different kinds of art expression. Low presence of external visiting academics. To increase the exposure of students to experiences of different kinds of art expression through stronger collaboration of different labs and the presence of a core group of courses at the earlier years of the program. Collaborations could extend to other art schools (e.g. dance, music, performance etc.). Through the existing strong international reputation and links of ASFA with other international art schools to encourage the exchange of academic staff."
«ΑΠΘ – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."AUTH from its inception to present time has a reputation of providing excellent education to its students in their respective fields of study. The research operations of the university are sizeable and impressive, both in the physical sciences and the humanities. They also include a few excellent examples of world-class research and recognition. The University has initiated the strategic planning process, which should be continued and completed. Specific NEGATIVE points: Lack of systematic coordination of student seminars, scientific interactions among students, and between students and faculty or other researchers. Limited cross links, collaboration and interactions among centers of excellence, industrial partners, and graduate studies. The EEC feels that the Research Committee should identify high caliber research activities across the university and combine them into larger research centers or units from both natural sciences and the humanities."
«Διεθνές Πανεπιστήμιο Ελλάδος – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."IHU should intensify efforts for the recruitment of international students. Some study programmes are rather overspecialized. A crucial step for the IHU’s future development would be to improve and expand the university campus. For this reason it is important that IHU acquires the ownership of the campus and buildings."
«ΕΜΠ – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 3 Ιουνίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."For the most part, NTUA appears to be well organized. It enjoys outstanding reputation thanks to a subset of its top-notch students and faculty that pursue a broad range of high-caliber research. Over the years, such a top-notch human capital has made major contributions to the Nation, and serves as shining ambassadors of Greek Science and Technology worldwide."
«Τ.Ε.Ι. Κρήτης – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 22 Ιουνίου 2020."TEI Crete is blessed with a number of highly qualified academic faculty with internationally recognized research outputs.In general terms, there is a healthy underdog mentality to strive for improvement in research output and the institution appears to have a competitive status vis-à-vis other institutions. By design, the TEI of Crete overall deviates grossly from "model 1 campus/HEI". The Institution needs to resolve the inconsistencies in operations created by the dispersal of academic departments in different geographical areas. The mission of the Institution should be stated concisely."
«Γεωπονικό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC was impressed by the high quality of undergraduate and postgraduate programs and faculty research. AUA is committed to competitive research and extension activities in both scientifically and economically important areas, notably in agriculture, food science and natural resource management."
«ΕΚΠΑ – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC’s assessment is that UOA is worthy of merit. In view of the fact that a mandatory legal review is absent, the EEC suggests that an annual self-evaluation by the faculty member be implemented, followed by a collegial session with an appropriate peer-group for discussion and self-reflection. Similar procedures need to be implemented for all ranks of professorial and administrative staff. The EEC recommends that UOA develop a common template of a syllabus with minimum requirements and expectations for each course (including the grading procedures, content, learning outcomes, etc.). Beyond that, the faculty should be able to add whatever additional information they deem relevant for their classes. We conclude by pointing out that the recommendations indicated in our report are intended as ways to improve an already excellent Institution. The culture of excellence in research and teaching that the Institution has established for itself was appreciated by every member of the EEC."
«TEI of Athens – External Evaluation Report of Institution»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 13 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC has reached the conclusion that TEI-A is operating at a level of excellence that transcends expectations, with great enthusiasm and commitment. However, there are specific points of criticism that have been specifically addressed in this report. The EEC believes that by considering our suggestions TEI-A has an opportunity to set a national or even European standard in the field of higher technological education."
«TEI of Piraeus – External Evaluation Report»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 13 Ιουλίου 2019."PUAS is a modern, forwarding looking institution with a clear vision, committed to a process of continuous improvement. Recent successes in developing a research culture and running a wide range of MSc programs have paved the way for the potential introduction of third-cycle degree programs."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 10 Απριλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC evaluated and scored according to our estimate of where UPatras stands in relation to our understanding of an international norm of excellence. Although we are conscious of the severe constraints imposed by the Greek State, we have not used them as an excuse for not identifying areas of improvement. Please note that an EEC member gave a worthy of merit vote by taking into account with a heavier weight the negative influence of the external environment on the ability to plan, strategise and operate."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Κρήτης – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Overall, the external evaluation committee was impressed by the commitment to excellence permeating all levels of the institution. For a relatively new university, UoC has made remarkable achievements in the Greek academic world and beyond. While there is a general acceptance of both internal and external evaluation, the institution needs to develop “tighter” formal processes for monitoring and recording the progress and implementation of changes. The institution needs to consider introducing mechanisms to further support faculty development and move expeditiously to further communicate and develop the strategic goals associated with the “2020-2025” vision statement."
«Πολυτεχνείο Κρήτης – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Two members of the EEC give a lower evaluation (positive) due to the fact that QA of the Institution is actually not in place and also that the absence of a feasible strategic plan hampers the Institution’s operation and its readiness to change."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 7 Ιουνίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Overall, the University provides a positive and supportive environment for students and faculty. Further development of a mid-term strategic plan including feasibility studies, timelines, implementation plans, responsibilities and metrics (inclusive bottom up approach and stakeholders). Accelerate the pace of implementation of digital technologies for teaching and learning. Improve financial accounting and reporting."
«Δημοκρίτειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θράκης – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The report was honest and clear in pointing out strengths as well as weaknesses. One dissenting member who finds the final rating as “Worthy of Merit” views it as a rating of “the totality of the internal evaluation process” with emphasis on the overall efficacy."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλίας – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."UTH provides a positive and collegial work environment. The EEC believes that with hard work and dedication, the University of Thessaly will be able to reach its full potential in the near future."
«Οικονομικό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."AUEB is a leading Greek institution in its field and stands well in comparison to international institutions attaining excellence in the areas of entrepreneurship and internationalisation and in its social involvement and contribution."
«Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Panteion University is a very strong academic institution in teaching and research. The structure of the institution provides a perfect environment for the evolution of intrainsitutional interdisciplinary research and education structures. However, there are still dormant possibilities that have to be exploited, in order to secure the future and the prosperity of the Institution in a rapidly changing world."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Πειραιώς – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."University of Piraeus offers some unique programs in the undergraduate and Masters level that specifically address the needs of the economy, specific needs of important industries and those of the public sector. Specific strategies should be incorporated in the mission statement associated with specific measurable goals and objectives."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Μακεδονίας – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The UoM endeavours to play a central role as an academic institution in the Balkans. The general operation has been very positively evaluated and the EEC feels that the Institution has the potential to evolve into a major educational and cultural pole for northern Greece and the Balkans."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Δυτικής Μακεδονίας – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC has decided to give to UoWM a positive evaluation. UoWM has self-motivated, dynamic and recognized faculty. Several research units at UoWM are productive, visible, and deliver good quality research. The size, dispersion, and diversity of the Institution need to be thoroughly addressed, since they may produce serious obstacles to the viability of the Institution."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Πελοποννήσου – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The UoP has high quality teaching staff. Also, the Institution has established good relationships with the community and its stakeholders. The Institution will benefit by developing more systematic approaches in the collection of data for the improvement of its programmes and internationalization strategy."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Very limited infrastructure. Insufficient welfare and social services for students. Insufficient personnel (academic, administrative, and technical support) and low ratios of faculty members to students and administration members to faculty members. Limited financial resources from the state, affecting the general development of the institution. There is a general lack of certified procedural approaches, although it is clear that procedures at the UoA are increasingly systematized and formalised. The University should insist on the implementation of its strategic plan despite external adversities and further emphasize internationalization, intensify and systematise quest for external funding, both from the EU and from the private sector. Capitalize on their assets and good name of the University, its alumni, as well as on its unique geographical location-rebranding."
«Ιόνιο Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The Ionian University after 27 years of operation is one of the newest institutions of Higher Education in Greece, offering unique study programs for the new generation of Greek scientists ensuring high-level research in sectors with high social, scientific and economic added value and performance. The University needs important improvements in the strategic plan for high-level quality of research and a clear vision and policy of a coordinated process. The EEC finds that the Internationalization Strategy of the Institution needs further development."
«Χαροκόπειο Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Consistently with its vision, Harokopio University addresses scientific areas that serve society, health education, technology and the environment. In considering further growth and academic development, the university should engage in more in-depth planning."
«Ελληνικό Ανοικτό Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."HOU is a unique institution of HEI in Greece, offering distance learning degrees. The EEC has reached the conclusion that HOU meets our expectations in pursuing its academic and social mission. There is much that has been accomplished thus far and is now at a turning point that provides opportunities for strategic initiatives that will further raise its profile in Greece and abroad. HOU should consider raising the standard of its educational material and making it available in the open market."
«ΑΣΠΑΙΤΕ – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης» (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2018."Several research units at ASPETE are productive, visible, and deliver good-quality research. However, strategic planning designed with clear goals and timetables, though considered as crucial in all aspects, does not exist at the moment. There is no coherent research orientation as a whole and research policy."
Υ.Α .151 /2995/Β6Αρχειοθετήθηκε 2016-09-09 στο Wayback Machine. Αριθμ. Φ.151/2995/Β6 Εισαγωγή σπουδαστών στο πρώτο έτος σπουδών του Τμήματος Εικαστικών Τεχνών της Ανωτάτης Σχολής Καλών Τεχνών.
«ΑΠΘ – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."AUTH from its inception to present time has a reputation of providing excellent education to its students in their respective fields of study. The research operations of the university are sizeable and impressive, both in the physical sciences and the humanities. They also include a few excellent examples of world-class research and recognition. The University has initiated the strategic planning process, which should be continued and completed. Specific NEGATIVE points: Lack of systematic coordination of student seminars, scientific interactions among students, and between students and faculty or other researchers. Limited cross links, collaboration and interactions among centers of excellence, industrial partners, and graduate studies. The EEC feels that the Research Committee should identify high caliber research activities across the university and combine them into larger research centers or units from both natural sciences and the humanities."
«Διεθνές Πανεπιστήμιο Ελλάδος – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."IHU should intensify efforts for the recruitment of international students. Some study programmes are rather overspecialized. A crucial step for the IHU’s future development would be to improve and expand the university campus. For this reason it is important that IHU acquires the ownership of the campus and buildings."
«ΕΜΠ – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 3 Ιουνίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."For the most part, NTUA appears to be well organized. It enjoys outstanding reputation thanks to a subset of its top-notch students and faculty that pursue a broad range of high-caliber research. Over the years, such a top-notch human capital has made major contributions to the Nation, and serves as shining ambassadors of Greek Science and Technology worldwide."
«Τ.Ε.Ι. Κρήτης – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 22 Ιουνίου 2020."TEI Crete is blessed with a number of highly qualified academic faculty with internationally recognized research outputs.In general terms, there is a healthy underdog mentality to strive for improvement in research output and the institution appears to have a competitive status vis-à-vis other institutions. By design, the TEI of Crete overall deviates grossly from "model 1 campus/HEI". The Institution needs to resolve the inconsistencies in operations created by the dispersal of academic departments in different geographical areas. The mission of the Institution should be stated concisely."
«Γεωπονικό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC was impressed by the high quality of undergraduate and postgraduate programs and faculty research. AUA is committed to competitive research and extension activities in both scientifically and economically important areas, notably in agriculture, food science and natural resource management."
«ΕΚΠΑ – Εξωτερική Αξιολόγηση ΑΔΙΠ»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC’s assessment is that UOA is worthy of merit. In view of the fact that a mandatory legal review is absent, the EEC suggests that an annual self-evaluation by the faculty member be implemented, followed by a collegial session with an appropriate peer-group for discussion and self-reflection. Similar procedures need to be implemented for all ranks of professorial and administrative staff. The EEC recommends that UOA develop a common template of a syllabus with minimum requirements and expectations for each course (including the grading procedures, content, learning outcomes, etc.). Beyond that, the faculty should be able to add whatever additional information they deem relevant for their classes. We conclude by pointing out that the recommendations indicated in our report are intended as ways to improve an already excellent Institution. The culture of excellence in research and teaching that the Institution has established for itself was appreciated by every member of the EEC."
«TEI of Athens – External Evaluation Report of Institution»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 13 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC has reached the conclusion that TEI-A is operating at a level of excellence that transcends expectations, with great enthusiasm and commitment. However, there are specific points of criticism that have been specifically addressed in this report. The EEC believes that by considering our suggestions TEI-A has an opportunity to set a national or even European standard in the field of higher technological education."
«TEI of Piraeus – External Evaluation Report»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 13 Ιουλίου 2019."PUAS is a modern, forwarding looking institution with a clear vision, committed to a process of continuous improvement. Recent successes in developing a research culture and running a wide range of MSc programs have paved the way for the potential introduction of third-cycle degree programs."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Πατρών – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 10 Απριλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC evaluated and scored according to our estimate of where UPatras stands in relation to our understanding of an international norm of excellence. Although we are conscious of the severe constraints imposed by the Greek State, we have not used them as an excuse for not identifying areas of improvement. Please note that an EEC member gave a worthy of merit vote by taking into account with a heavier weight the negative influence of the external environment on the ability to plan, strategise and operate."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Κρήτης – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Overall, the external evaluation committee was impressed by the commitment to excellence permeating all levels of the institution. For a relatively new university, UoC has made remarkable achievements in the Greek academic world and beyond. While there is a general acceptance of both internal and external evaluation, the institution needs to develop “tighter” formal processes for monitoring and recording the progress and implementation of changes. The institution needs to consider introducing mechanisms to further support faculty development and move expeditiously to further communicate and develop the strategic goals associated with the “2020-2025” vision statement."
«Πολυτεχνείο Κρήτης – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Two members of the EEC give a lower evaluation (positive) due to the fact that QA of the Institution is actually not in place and also that the absence of a feasible strategic plan hampers the Institution’s operation and its readiness to change."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 7 Ιουνίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Overall, the University provides a positive and supportive environment for students and faculty. Further development of a mid-term strategic plan including feasibility studies, timelines, implementation plans, responsibilities and metrics (inclusive bottom up approach and stakeholders). Accelerate the pace of implementation of digital technologies for teaching and learning. Improve financial accounting and reporting."
«Δημοκρίτειο Πανεπιστήμιο Θράκης – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The report was honest and clear in pointing out strengths as well as weaknesses. One dissenting member who finds the final rating as “Worthy of Merit” views it as a rating of “the totality of the internal evaluation process” with emphasis on the overall efficacy."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Θεσσαλίας – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."UTH provides a positive and collegial work environment. The EEC believes that with hard work and dedication, the University of Thessaly will be able to reach its full potential in the near future."
«Οικονομικό Πανεπιστήμιο Αθηνών – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."AUEB is a leading Greek institution in its field and stands well in comparison to international institutions attaining excellence in the areas of entrepreneurship and internationalisation and in its social involvement and contribution."
«Πάντειο Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 12 Ιουλίου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Panteion University is a very strong academic institution in teaching and research. The structure of the institution provides a perfect environment for the evolution of intrainsitutional interdisciplinary research and education structures. However, there are still dormant possibilities that have to be exploited, in order to secure the future and the prosperity of the Institution in a rapidly changing world."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Πειραιώς – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."University of Piraeus offers some unique programs in the undergraduate and Masters level that specifically address the needs of the economy, specific needs of important industries and those of the public sector. Specific strategies should be incorporated in the mission statement associated with specific measurable goals and objectives."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Μακεδονίας – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The UoM endeavours to play a central role as an academic institution in the Balkans. The general operation has been very positively evaluated and the EEC feels that the Institution has the potential to evolve into a major educational and cultural pole for northern Greece and the Balkans."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Δυτικής Μακεδονίας – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The EEC has decided to give to UoWM a positive evaluation. UoWM has self-motivated, dynamic and recognized faculty. Several research units at UoWM are productive, visible, and deliver good quality research. The size, dispersion, and diversity of the Institution need to be thoroughly addressed, since they may produce serious obstacles to the viability of the Institution."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Πελοποννήσου – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The UoP has high quality teaching staff. Also, the Institution has established good relationships with the community and its stakeholders. The Institution will benefit by developing more systematic approaches in the collection of data for the improvement of its programmes and internationalization strategy."
«Πανεπιστήμιο Αιγαίου – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2015. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Very limited infrastructure. Insufficient welfare and social services for students. Insufficient personnel (academic, administrative, and technical support) and low ratios of faculty members to students and administration members to faculty members. Limited financial resources from the state, affecting the general development of the institution. There is a general lack of certified procedural approaches, although it is clear that procedures at the UoA are increasingly systematized and formalised. The University should insist on the implementation of its strategic plan despite external adversities and further emphasize internationalization, intensify and systematise quest for external funding, both from the EU and from the private sector. Capitalize on their assets and good name of the University, its alumni, as well as on its unique geographical location-rebranding."
«Ιόνιο Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."The Ionian University after 27 years of operation is one of the newest institutions of Higher Education in Greece, offering unique study programs for the new generation of Greek scientists ensuring high-level research in sectors with high social, scientific and economic added value and performance. The University needs important improvements in the strategic plan for high-level quality of research and a clear vision and policy of a coordinated process. The EEC finds that the Internationalization Strategy of the Institution needs further development."
«Χαροκόπειο Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."Consistently with its vision, Harokopio University addresses scientific areas that serve society, health education, technology and the environment. In considering further growth and academic development, the university should engage in more in-depth planning."
«Ελληνικό Ανοικτό Πανεπιστήμιο – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης»(PDF) (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο(PDF) στις 31 Μαΐου 2019. Ανακτήθηκε στις 15 Ιουλίου 2019."HOU is a unique institution of HEI in Greece, offering distance learning degrees. The EEC has reached the conclusion that HOU meets our expectations in pursuing its academic and social mission. There is much that has been accomplished thus far and is now at a turning point that provides opportunities for strategic initiatives that will further raise its profile in Greece and abroad. HOU should consider raising the standard of its educational material and making it available in the open market."
«ΑΣΠΑΙΤΕ – Έκθεση Εξωτερικής Αξιολόγησης» (στα Αγγλικά). www.adip.gr. 2016. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2018."Several research units at ASPETE are productive, visible, and deliver good-quality research. However, strategic planning designed with clear goals and timetables, though considered as crucial in all aspects, does not exist at the moment. There is no coherent research orientation as a whole and research policy."
Υ.Α .151 /2995/Β6Αρχειοθετήθηκε 2016-09-09 στο Wayback Machine. Αριθμ. Φ.151/2995/Β6 Εισαγωγή σπουδαστών στο πρώτο έτος σπουδών του Τμήματος Εικαστικών Τεχνών της Ανωτάτης Σχολής Καλών Τεχνών.
