Μέθοδος Ντ'Οντ (Greek Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Μέθοδος Ντ'Οντ" in Greek language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Greek rank

6doi.org

2^nd place

3^rd place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

1tcd.ie

5,099^th place

8,235^th place

1arxiv.org

69^th place

279^th place

1uni-augsburg.de

9,325^th place

low place

1kenbenoit.net

low place

1archive.org

6^th place

5^th place

1britannica.com

40^th place

17^th place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

6^th place

1numdam.org

8,650^th place

low place

archive.org

Lijphart, Arend (1990). «The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945-85». The American Political Science Review 84 (2): 481–496. doi:10.2307/1963530. https://archive.org/details/sim_american-political-science-review_1990-06_84_2/page/481.

arxiv.org

«Pot and Ladle: Seat Allocation and Seat Bias under the Jefferson-D'Hondt Method» (PDF). 18 Νοεμβρίου 2018.

books.google.com

Lijphart, Arend (2003), «Degrees of proportionality of proportional representation formulas», στο: Grofman, Bernard; Lijphart, Arend, επιμ., Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, Agathon series on representation, 1, Algora Publishing, σελ. 170–179, ISBN 9780875862675 . See in particular the section "Sainte-Lague", pp. 174–175.

britannica.com

«Election - Plurality and majority systems» (στα αγγλικά). https://www.britannica.com/topic/election-political-science/Plurality-and-majority-systems#ref416872. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2018-04-30.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

Gallagher, Michael (1991). «Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems». Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις November 16, 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20131116104818/http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElectoralStudies1991.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 30 January 2016.
Juraj Medzihorsky (2019). «Rethinking the D'Hondt method». Political Research Exchange 1 (1): 1625712. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2019.1625712.
Schuster, Karsten; Pukelsheim, Friedrich; Drton, Mathias; Draper, Norman R. (2003). «Seat biases of apportionment methods for proportional representation». Electoral Studies 22 (4): 651–676. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00027-6. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2016-02-15. https://web.archive.org/web/20160215162203/http://www.math.uni-augsburg.de/stochastik/pukelsheim/2003b.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2020-04-04.
Benoit, Kenneth (2000). «Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence». Political Analysis 8 (4): 381–388. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029822. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2016-02-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20160205211238/http://www.kenbenoit.net/pdfs/PA84-381-388.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2020-04-04.
Lijphart, Arend (1990). «The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945-85». The American Political Science Review 84 (2): 481–496. doi:10.2307/1963530. https://archive.org/details/sim_american-political-science-review_1990-06_84_2/page/481.
Juraj Medzihorsky (2019). «Rethinking the D'Hondt method». Political Research Exchange 1 (1): 1625712. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2019.1625712.

kenbenoit.net

Benoit, Kenneth (2000). «Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence». Political Analysis 8 (4): 381–388. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029822. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2016-02-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20160205211238/http://www.kenbenoit.net/pdfs/PA84-381-388.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2020-04-04.

numdam.org

André Sainte-Laguë (1910). «La représentation Proportionnelle et la méthode des moindres carrés». Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure (l'École Normale Supérieure) 27. http://www.numdam.org/article/ASENS_1910_3_27__529_0.pdf.

tcd.ie

Gallagher, Michael (1991). «Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems». Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις November 16, 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20131116104818/http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElectoralStudies1991.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 30 January 2016.

uni-augsburg.de

math.uni-augsburg.de

Schuster, Karsten; Pukelsheim, Friedrich; Drton, Mathias; Draper, Norman R. (2003). «Seat biases of apportionment methods for proportional representation». Electoral Studies 22 (4): 651–676. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00027-6. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2016-02-15. https://web.archive.org/web/20160215162203/http://www.math.uni-augsburg.de/stochastik/pukelsheim/2003b.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2020-04-04.

web.archive.org

Gallagher, Michael (1991). «Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems». Electoral Studies 10 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις November 16, 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20131116104818/http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElectoralStudies1991.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 30 January 2016.
Schuster, Karsten; Pukelsheim, Friedrich; Drton, Mathias; Draper, Norman R. (2003). «Seat biases of apportionment methods for proportional representation». Electoral Studies 22 (4): 651–676. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00027-6. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2016-02-15. https://web.archive.org/web/20160215162203/http://www.math.uni-augsburg.de/stochastik/pukelsheim/2003b.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2020-04-04.
Benoit, Kenneth (2000). «Which Electoral Formula Is the Most Proportional? A New Look with New Evidence». Political Analysis 8 (4): 381–388. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029822. Αρχειοθετήθηκε από το πρωτότυπο στις 2016-02-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20160205211238/http://www.kenbenoit.net/pdfs/PA84-381-388.pdf. Ανακτήθηκε στις 2020-04-04.