Πρόβλημα οριοθέτησης ή διαχωρισμού (Greek Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Πρόβλημα οριοθέτησης ή διαχωρισμού" in Greek language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Greek rank

2^nd place

3^rd place

3^rd place

6^th place

6^th place

5^th place

5^th place

8^th place

179^th place

233^rd place

6,512^th place

low place

120^th place

213^th place

4,141^st place

6,372^nd place

archive.org

Cover, J. A., επιμ. (1998). Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues. σελίδες 1–82. ISBN 978-0-393-97175-0.
Lloyd, G.E.R. (1979), Magic Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, σελ. 15–27, ISBN 0-521-29641-2, https://archive.org/details/magicreasonexper0000lloy/page/15
For example: Mahner, Martin (2007). «Demarcating science from non-science». Στο: Kuipers, Theo A. F., επιμ. General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland. σελίδες 515–575. ISBN 0444515488. See Figures 2, 3, and 4, which show various relationships of science, nonscience, illusory knowledge (parascience), ordinary knowledge, and reliable knowledge.

Laudan, Larry (1983), «The Demise of the Demarcation Problem», στο: Cohen, R.S.; Laudan, L., επιμ., Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 76, Dordrecht: D. Reidel, σελ. 111–127, ISBN 90-277-1533-5, https://books.google.com/books?id=AEvprSJzv2MC&pg=PA111
Lakatos, I.· Feyerabend, P. (1999). For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. University of Chicago Press. σελ. 20. ISBN 9780226467740. The demarcation problem may be formulated in the following terms: what distinguishes science from pseudoscience? This is an extreme way of putting it, since the more general problem, called the Generalized Demarcation Problem, is really the problem of the appraisal of scientific theories, and attempts to answer the question: when is one theory better than another?
Grayling, AC., Wittgenstein: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 67–68.
Taylor, C.A. (1996). Defining Science: A Rhetoric of Demarcation. Rhetoric of the Human Sciences Series. University of Wisconsin Press. σελ. 41. ISBN 9780299150341.

Resnik, David B. (2000). «A pragmatic approach to the demarcation problem». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2): 249–267. doi:10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00004-2.
Fernandez-Beanato, Damian (2020). «Cicero's demarcation of science: a report of shared criteria». Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.04.002.
Watling, John (January 1967). «Classics of Analytical Philosophy. By Robert R. Ammerman. (McGraw-Hill. 1965. Pp. 413. Price £2 12s.)». Philosophy 42 (159): 95. doi:10.1017/s0031819100000954. ISSN 0031-8191.
Thagard, Paul R. (1978), «Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience», PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978: 223–234, doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639
Pingree, David (1992), «Hellenophilia versus the History of Science», Isis 83 (4): 554–563, doi:10.1086/356288
Irzik, Gürol; Nola, Robert (July 2011). «A family resemblance approach to the nature of science for science education». Science & Education 20 (7): 591–607. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225424936.

Hansson, Sven Ove (2008). «Science and Pseudo-Science». Στο: Zalta, Edward N., επιμ. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 έκδοση), 4.2 Falsificationism. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/pseudo-science#KarPop.

Watling, John (January 1967). «Classics of Analytical Philosophy. By Robert R. Ammerman. (McGraw-Hill. 1965. Pp. 413. Price £2 12s.)». Philosophy 42 (159): 95. doi:10.1017/s0031819100000954. ISSN 0031-8191.