Ωροσκόπιο (Greek Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ωροσκόπιο" in Greek language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Greek rank

4doi.org

2^nd place

3^rd place

2archive.org

6^th place

5^th place

2harvard.edu

18^th place

57^th place

1cjr.org

4,313^th place

8,987^th place

1howstuffworks.com

840^th place

744^th place

1uio.no

2,613^th place

5,717^th place

1britannica.com

40^th place

17^th place

1astrosociety.org

low place

7,282^nd place

1uwi.edu

9,201^st place

low place

1lbl.gov

2,509^th place

1,306^th place

1zenodo.org

621^st place

1,469^th place

archive.org

Hartmann, P.; Reuter, M.; Nyborga, H. (May 2006). «The relationship between date of birth and individual differences in personality and general intelligence: A large-scale study». Personality and Individual Differences 40 (7): 1349–1362. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.017. https://archive.org/details/sim_personality-and-individual-differences_2006-05_40_7/page/1349. «To optimise the chances of finding even remote relationships between date of birth and individual differences in personality and intelligence we further applied two different strategies. The first one was based on the common chronological concept of time (e.g. month of birth and season of birth). The second strategy was based on the (pseudo-scientific) concept of astrology (e.g. Sun Signs, The Elements, and astrological gender), as discussed in the book Astrology: Science or superstition? by Eysenck and Nias (1982).».
Vishveshwara, edited by S.K. Biswas, D.C.V. Mallik, C.V. (1989). Cosmic Perspectives: Essays Dedicated to the Memory of M.K.V. Bappu (1. publ. έκδοση). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34354-2. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)

astrosociety.org

«Astronomical Pseudo-Science: A Skeptic's Resource List». Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

britannica.com

Astrology. Encyclopædia Britannica.

cjr.org

Gourarie, Chava (3 Μαρτίου 2016). «Why are horoscopes and media a match?». Columbia Journalism Review (στα Αγγλικά). Ανακτήθηκε στις 11 Απριλίου 2022.

doi.org

dx.doi.org

Thagard, Paul R. (1978). «Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience». Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (The University of Chicago Press) 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/MNSES9100/v16/pensumliste/environmental-ethics/thagard-astrology.pdf.
Hartmann, P.; Reuter, M.; Nyborga, H. (May 2006). «The relationship between date of birth and individual differences in personality and general intelligence: A large-scale study». Personality and Individual Differences 40 (7): 1349–1362. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.017. https://archive.org/details/sim_personality-and-individual-differences_2006-05_40_7/page/1349. «To optimise the chances of finding even remote relationships between date of birth and individual differences in personality and intelligence we further applied two different strategies. The first one was based on the common chronological concept of time (e.g. month of birth and season of birth). The second strategy was based on the (pseudo-scientific) concept of astrology (e.g. Sun Signs, The Elements, and astrological gender), as discussed in the book Astrology: Science or superstition? by Eysenck and Nias (1982).».
Carlson, Shawn (1985). «A double-blind test of astrology». Nature 318 (6045): 419–425. doi:10.1038/318419a0. Bibcode: 1985Natur.318..419C. http://muller.lbl.gov/papers/Astrology-Carlson.pdf.
Zarka, Philippe (2011). «Astronomy and astrology». Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (S260): 420–425. doi:10.1017/S1743921311002602. Bibcode: 2011IAUS..260..420Z. https://zenodo.org/record/890932.

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

Carlson, Shawn (1985). «A double-blind test of astrology». Nature 318 (6045): 419–425. doi:10.1038/318419a0. Bibcode: 1985Natur.318..419C. http://muller.lbl.gov/papers/Astrology-Carlson.pdf.
Zarka, Philippe (2011). «Astronomy and astrology». Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (S260): 420–425. doi:10.1017/S1743921311002602. Bibcode: 2011IAUS..260..420Z. https://zenodo.org/record/890932.

howstuffworks.com

people.howstuffworks.com

«How Horoscopes Work». 29 Ιανουαρίου 2005.

lbl.gov

muller.lbl.gov

Carlson, Shawn (1985). «A double-blind test of astrology». Nature 318 (6045): 419–425. doi:10.1038/318419a0. Bibcode: 1985Natur.318..419C. http://muller.lbl.gov/papers/Astrology-Carlson.pdf.

uio.no

Thagard, Paul R. (1978). «Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience». Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (The University of Chicago Press) 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/MNSES9100/v16/pensumliste/environmental-ethics/thagard-astrology.pdf.

uwi.edu

cavehill.uwi.edu

Peter D. Asquith, επιμ. (1978). Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1. Dordrecht u.a.: Reidel u.a. ISBN 978-0-917586-05-7.

zenodo.org

Zarka, Philippe (2011). «Astronomy and astrology». Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (S260): 420–425. doi:10.1017/S1743921311002602. Bibcode: 2011IAUS..260..420Z. https://zenodo.org/record/890932.