Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "2-Aminotetralin" in English language version.
In previous studies, 2-AT either did not stimulate spontaneous motor activity in mice (1,8), or it had 10% of the activity of amphetamine (24). Yet, in the present study, it mimicked (+)-amphetamine as a DS in rats, in agreement with the results of Glennon et al. (7). However, 2-AT was one-half as potent as (+)-amphetamine in that study but only one-eighth as potent as (+)-amphetamine in the present experiment.
In previous studies, 2-AT either did not stimulate spontaneous motor activity in mice (1,8), or it had 10% of the activity of amphetamine (24). Yet, in the present study, it mimicked (+)-amphetamine as a DS in rats, in agreement with the results of Glennon et al. (7). However, 2-AT was one-half as potent as (+)-amphetamine in that study but only one-eighth as potent as (+)-amphetamine in the present experiment.
In previous studies, 2-AT either did not stimulate spontaneous motor activity in mice (1,8), or it had 10% of the activity of amphetamine (24). Yet, in the present study, it mimicked (+)-amphetamine as a DS in rats, in agreement with the results of Glennon et al. (7). However, 2-AT was one-half as potent as (+)-amphetamine in that study but only one-eighth as potent as (+)-amphetamine in the present experiment.
In previous studies, 2-AT either did not stimulate spontaneous motor activity in mice (1,8), or it had 10% of the activity of amphetamine (24). Yet, in the present study, it mimicked (+)-amphetamine as a DS in rats, in agreement with the results of Glennon et al. (7). However, 2-AT was one-half as potent as (+)-amphetamine in that study but only one-eighth as potent as (+)-amphetamine in the present experiment.