2016 Democratic National Committee email leak (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "2016 Democratic National Committee email leak" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
34th place
27th place
1st place
1st place
7th place
7th place
28th place
26th place
476th place
282nd place
12th place
11th place
5th place
5th place
61st place
54th place
49th place
47th place
108th place
80th place
175th place
137th place
484th place
323rd place
3,754th place
2,155th place
2,523rd place
1,574th place
146th place
110th place
137th place
101st place
330th place
222nd place
79th place
65th place
204th place
353rd place
48th place
39th place
2nd place
2nd place
634th place
432nd place
2,031st place
1,171st place
915th place
566th place
99th place
77th place
low place
low place
388th place
265th place
482nd place
552nd place
3,700th place
2,360th place
290th place
202nd place
609th place
366th place
2,152nd place
1,244th place
3,894th place
2,123rd place
456th place
300th place
4,705th place
2,665th place
187th place
146th place
472nd place
340th place
1,368th place
793rd place
3,208th place
1,803rd place
2,008th place
1,197th place
140th place
115th place
134th place
100th place
1,607th place
862nd place
1,029th place
657th place
312th place
197th place
529th place
314th place
152nd place
120th place
139th place
108th place
low place
low place
497th place
371st place
1,948th place
1,153rd place
2,088th place
1,251st place
1,110th place
695th place
92nd place
72nd place
8th place
10th place
3,745th place
2,365th place
117th place
145th place

abc.net.au (Global: 139th place; English: 108th place)

arstechnica.com (Global: 388th place; English: 265th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; English: 10th place)

belfasttelegraph.co.uk (Global: 915th place; English: 566th place)

bloomberg.com (Global: 99th place; English: 77th place)

businessinsider.com (Global: 140th place; English: 115th place)

buzzfeednews.com (Global: 1,368th place; English: 793rd place)

  • Frenkel, Sheena (October 15, 2016). "Meet Fancy Bear". Buzzfeed News. Retrieved October 15, 2016.

cbsnews.com (Global: 108th place; English: 80th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; English: 26th place)

edition.cnn.com

cnn.com

  • Polantz, Katelyn; Collinson, Stephen (July 13, 2018). "12 Russians indicted in Mueller investigation". CNN. Retrieved February 24, 2023.
  • Sciutto, Jim; Perez, Evan (February 10, 2017). "US investigators corroborate some aspects of the Russia dossier". CNN. Retrieved February 10, 2017.

crowdstrike.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

democracynow.org (Global: 3,745th place; English: 2,365th place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

dx.doi.org

doi.org

dw.com (Global: 204th place; English: 353rd place)

esquire.com (Global: 472nd place; English: 340th place)

fivethirtyeight.com (Global: 2,031st place; English: 1,171st place)

  • Enten, Harry (December 23, 2016). "How Much Did WikiLeaks Hurt Hillary Clinton?". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved February 15, 2018. The evidence suggests WikiLeaks is among the factors that might have contributed to her loss, but we really can't say much more than that.

foxnews.com (Global: 152nd place; English: 120th place)

go.com (Global: 48th place; English: 39th place)

abcnews.go.com

haaretz.com (Global: 497th place; English: 371st place)

house.gov (Global: 529th place; English: 314th place)

intelligence.house.gov

houstonchronicle.com (Global: 1,607th place; English: 862nd place)

interfax.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

mediaite.com (Global: 3,894th place; English: 2,123rd place)

motherjones.com (Global: 2,008th place; English: 1,197th place)

msn.com (Global: 117th place; English: 145th place)

msnbc.com (Global: 2,152nd place; English: 1,244th place)

nbcnews.com (Global: 137th place; English: 101st place)

newrepublic.com (Global: 1,948th place; English: 1,153rd place)

newyorker.com (Global: 146th place; English: 110th place)

npr.org (Global: 92nd place; English: 72nd place)

nydailynews.com (Global: 134th place; English: 100th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

opensecrets.org (Global: 4,705th place; English: 2,665th place)

politico.com (Global: 312th place; English: 197th place)

politifact.com (Global: 3,208th place; English: 1,803rd place)

qz.com (Global: 1,110th place; English: 695th place)

realclearpolitics.com (Global: 3,754th place; English: 2,155th place)

reuters.com (Global: 49th place; English: 47th place)

salon.com (Global: 456th place; English: 300th place)

scribd.com (Global: 482nd place; English: 552nd place)

sun-sentinel.com (Global: 609th place; English: 366th place)

techcrunch.com (Global: 187th place; English: 146th place)

thedailybeast.com (Global: 330th place; English: 222nd place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; English: 11th place)

thehill.com (Global: 476th place; English: 282nd place)

theintercept.com (Global: 2,523rd place; English: 1,574th place)

thenation.com (Global: 2,088th place; English: 1,251st place)

theregister.com (Global: 3,700th place; English: 2,360th place)

time.com (Global: 61st place; English: 54th place)

time.com

content.time.com

upi.com (Global: 290th place; English: 202nd place)

usnews.com (Global: 634th place; English: 432nd place)

vice.com (Global: 175th place; English: 137th place)

vox.com (Global: 484th place; English: 323rd place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; English: 27th place)

washingtontimes.com (Global: 1,029th place; English: 657th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; English: 65th place)