2022–2023 Pentagon document leaks (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "2022–2023 Pentagon document leaks" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
7th place
7th place
34th place
27th place
49th place
47th place
28th place
26th place
12th place
11th place
14th place
14th place
5th place
5th place
137th place
101st place
79th place
65th place
48th place
39th place
312th place
197th place
92nd place
72nd place
2,523rd place
1,574th place
268th place
215th place
20th place
30th place
737th place
605th place
4,991st place
4,317th place
1,930th place
1,143rd place
low place
low place
3,951st place
2,391st place
1,008th place
891st place
5,005th place
low place
330th place
222nd place
108th place
80th place
4,697th place
3,004th place
38th place
40th place
519th place
316th place
3,698th place
2,659th place
129th place
89th place
8,923rd place
6,049th place
4,313th place
2,441st place

airandspaceforces.com (Global: 8,923rd place; English: 6,049th place)

aljazeera.com (Global: 268th place; English: 215th place)

apnews.com (Global: 129th place; English: 89th place)

archive.today (Global: 14th place; English: 14th place)

bbc.com (Global: 20th place; English: 30th place)

bellingcat.com (Global: 4,991st place; English: 4,317th place)

cbsnews.com (Global: 108th place; English: 80th place)

cjr.org (Global: 4,313th place; English: 2,441st place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; English: 26th place)

go.com (Global: 48th place; English: 39th place)

abcnews.go.com

greekreporter.com (Global: 3,698th place; English: 2,659th place)

jewishvirtuallibrary.org (Global: 1,008th place; English: 891st place)

kyivindependent.com (Global: 4,697th place; English: 3,004th place)

malcontentment.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

nbcnews.com (Global: 137th place; English: 101st place)

npr.org (Global: 92nd place; English: 72nd place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

politico.com (Global: 312th place; English: 197th place)

reuters.com (Global: 49th place; English: 47th place)

rferl.org (Global: 737th place; English: 605th place)

seattletimes.com (Global: 519th place; English: 316th place)

substack.com (Global: 3,951st place; English: 2,391st place)

ddosecrets.substack.com

thedailybeast.com (Global: 330th place; English: 222nd place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; English: 11th place)

theins.info (Global: 5,005th place; English: low place)

theintercept.com (Global: 2,523rd place; English: 1,574th place)

usni.org (Global: 1,930th place; English: 1,143rd place)

news.usni.org

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; English: 27th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; English: 65th place)

yahoo.com (Global: 38th place; English: 40th place)

news.yahoo.com

  • Rushton, James; Weiss, Michael. "Tranche of purported U.S. and allied military secrets leaked online in possible major intelligence breach". Yahoo! News. Archived from the original on April 8, 2023. Retrieved April 8, 2023. Ironically, pro-Russian commentators who originally saw the Ukraine files as valuable "gotchas" now doubt their authenticity after evidence of their doctoring came to light. Instead, they believe the U.S. or Ukraine released these texts as a psychological operation meant to dupe the Kremlin. ... Meanwhile, Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior Ukrainian official, claimed the leak of the original Ukraine files was a Russian provocation to discredit Kyiv's forthcoming counteroffensive.