A priori and a posteriori (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "A priori and a posteriori" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

3^rd place

2^nd place

179^th place

183^rd place

6^th place

low place

26^th place

20^th place

1,379^th place

1,175^th place

low place

6,915^th place

11^th place

8^th place

archive.org

Bird 1995, p. 439. Bird, Graham (1995). Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-866132-0.
Hoiberg 2010, p. 1 Hoiberg, Dale H., ed. (2010). "a priori knowledge". Encyclopædia Britannica, Vol. I: A-Ak – Bayes (15th ed.). Chicago, Illinois. ISBN 978-1-59339-837-8.{{cite encyclopedia}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

Galen Strawson has stated that an a priori argument is one in which "you can see that it is true just lying on your couch. You don't have to get up off your couch and go outside and examine the way things are in the physical world. You don't have to do any science." (Sommers 2003) Sommers, Tamler (March 2003). Jarman, Casey (ed.). "Galen Strawson (interview)". Believer Magazine. 1 (1). San Francisco, CA: McSweeney's McMullens. Retrieved 10 July 2013.

Kitcher 2001 Kitcher, Philip (2001). "A Priori Knowledge Revisited". In Boghossian, Paul; Peacocke, Christopher (eds.). New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199241279.^{[failed verification]}
Fred-Rivera, Ivette (10 August 2022). A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification. Springer Nature. pp. 40–45. ISBN 978-3-031-06874-4.
Kant 1781, p. 1 Kant, Immanuel (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of Pure Reason]. Im Insel-Verlag.

Quine 1951, p. 21 Quine, Willard Van Orman (1951). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". The Philosophical Review. 60 (1): 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906. JSTOR 2181906.
Quine 1951, p. 34 Quine, Willard Van Orman (1951). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". The Philosophical Review. 60 (1): 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906. JSTOR 2181906.

Quine 1951, p. 21 Quine, Willard Van Orman (1951). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". The Philosophical Review. 60 (1): 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906. JSTOR 2181906.
Quine 1951, p. 34 Quine, Willard Van Orman (1951). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". The Philosophical Review. 60 (1): 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906. JSTOR 2181906.
Sloman 1965. Sloman, A. (1 October 1965). "'Necessary', 'a priori' and 'analytic'". Analysis. 26 (1): 12–16. doi:10.1093/analys/26.1.12. S2CID 17118371.

Quine 1951, p. 21 Quine, Willard Van Orman (1951). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". The Philosophical Review. 60 (1): 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906. JSTOR 2181906.
Quine 1951, p. 34 Quine, Willard Van Orman (1951). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism". The Philosophical Review. 60 (1): 20–43. doi:10.2307/2181906. JSTOR 2181906.

Sloman 1965. Sloman, A. (1 October 1965). "'Necessary', 'a priori' and 'analytic'". Analysis. 26 (1): 12–16. doi:10.1093/analys/26.1.12. S2CID 17118371.

Some associationist philosophers have contended that mathematics comes from experience and is not a form of any a priori knowledge (Macleod 2016) Macleod, Christopher (25 August 2016). "John Stuart Mill". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.) – via Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Look 2007. Look, Brandon C. (22 December 2007). "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 ed.). Retrieved 22 May 2020 – via Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Baehr 2006, §3 Baehr, Jason S. (2006). "A Priori and A Posteriori". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Baehr 2006, §2-3 Baehr, Jason S. (2006). "A Priori and A Posteriori". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.