Weiss, Jillian Todd (2003). "GL vs. BT: The Archaeology of Biphobia and Transphobia Within the U.S. Gay and Lesbian Community". Journal of Bisexuality. 3 (3–4): 25–55. doi:10.1300/J159v03n03_02. S2CID144642959.
Hart's novels received a fair amount of critical attention and were reviewed in The New York Times, The New York Herald-Tribune, Saturday Review of Literature, and other leading publications of the times.In reviewing In the Lives of Men, the Saturday Review's critic wrote that, "... for a doctor, he seems to know surprisingly little of women. His portraits of them are little more than profile sketches". [1]Archived October 23, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, from a presentation by Brian Booth to OCHC's Discovering Oregon Originals '99 series in 2000
After the publication of Doctor Mallory, Hart wrote that one of his ambitions was "to be an 'unofficial observer' of the medical profession during the remainder of my life" and "to write a novel about a research institute, another about hospitals, another about a family of doctors". He eventually wrote all three. Hart's other novels are In the Lives of Men (1937) and Doctor Finlay Sees it Through (1942). [2]Archived October 23, 2008, at the Wayback Machine from a presentation by Brian Booth to OCHC's Discovering Oregon Originals '99 series in 2000
Roberts, Barbara (October 12, 1991). "Lucille Hart Dinner". Barbara Roberts Video Gallery.
ramapo.edu
phobos.ramapo.edu
The majority of Hart's biographers insist upon viewing the doctor as a woman in disguise, without regard for Hart's self-identification as a man, medical treatment, and legal documentation. O'Hartigan (2002) also refers to Patrick Califia's statement that "Katz's book is unfortunately tainted with a heavy dose of transphobia." She also brings up Katz's footnote in his Gay/Lesbian Almanac about an unpublished paper: "Transsexualism: Today's Quack Medicine: An Issue for Every Body", and noting his statement: "An historical study needs to be made of the medical and autobiographical literature on 'transsexualism'; it will, I think, reveal the fundamentally sexist nature of the concept and of the associated medical treatments." O'Hartigan also sets forth, disapprovingly, an explanation for referring to Hart as female by Susan Stryker: "As an historian favoring 'social construction' approaches to questions of identity, I have reservations about using the word transsexual to refer to people before the mid-20th century who identify in a profound, ongoing manner with a gender that they were not assigned to at birth." "GL vs BT". Archived from the original on March 29, 2016. Retrieved July 7, 2006.
Weiss, Jillian Todd (2003). "GL vs. BT: The Archaeology of Biphobia and Transphobia Within the U.S. Gay and Lesbian Community". Journal of Bisexuality. 3 (3–4): 25–55. doi:10.1300/J159v03n03_02. S2CID144642959.
Hart's novels received a fair amount of critical attention and were reviewed in The New York Times, The New York Herald-Tribune, Saturday Review of Literature, and other leading publications of the times.In reviewing In the Lives of Men, the Saturday Review's critic wrote that, "... for a doctor, he seems to know surprisingly little of women. His portraits of them are little more than profile sketches". [1]Archived October 23, 2008, at the Wayback Machine, from a presentation by Brian Booth to OCHC's Discovering Oregon Originals '99 series in 2000
After the publication of Doctor Mallory, Hart wrote that one of his ambitions was "to be an 'unofficial observer' of the medical profession during the remainder of my life" and "to write a novel about a research institute, another about hospitals, another about a family of doctors". He eventually wrote all three. Hart's other novels are In the Lives of Men (1937) and Doctor Finlay Sees it Through (1942). [2]Archived October 23, 2008, at the Wayback Machine from a presentation by Brian Booth to OCHC's Discovering Oregon Originals '99 series in 2000
The majority of Hart's biographers insist upon viewing the doctor as a woman in disguise, without regard for Hart's self-identification as a man, medical treatment, and legal documentation. O'Hartigan (2002) also refers to Patrick Califia's statement that "Katz's book is unfortunately tainted with a heavy dose of transphobia." She also brings up Katz's footnote in his Gay/Lesbian Almanac about an unpublished paper: "Transsexualism: Today's Quack Medicine: An Issue for Every Body", and noting his statement: "An historical study needs to be made of the medical and autobiographical literature on 'transsexualism'; it will, I think, reveal the fundamentally sexist nature of the concept and of the associated medical treatments." O'Hartigan also sets forth, disapprovingly, an explanation for referring to Hart as female by Susan Stryker: "As an historian favoring 'social construction' approaches to questions of identity, I have reservations about using the word transsexual to refer to people before the mid-20th century who identify in a profound, ongoing manner with a gender that they were not assigned to at birth." "GL vs BT". Archived from the original on March 29, 2016. Retrieved July 7, 2006.
