Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft Corp. (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Alcatel-Lucent v. Microsoft Corp." in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

4patents.google.com

1,182^nd place

725^th place

3leagle.com

4,919^th place

2,808^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

3cnet.com

272^nd place

225^th place

2bloomberg.com

99^th place

77^th place

2reuters.com

49^th place

47^th place

1physorg.com

6,156^th place

5,640^th place

1dspdesignline.com

low place

1informationweek.com

4,522^nd place

2,903^rd place

1rutgers.edu

1,999^th place

1,355^th place

1bbc.co.uk

8^th place

10^th place

1arstechnica.com

388^th place

265^th place

1pcworld.com

1,317^th place

873^rd place

1usatoday.com

41^st place

34^th place

1groklaw.net

low place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

arstechnica.com

origin.arstechnica.com

Bangeman, Eric (August 6, 2007). "Judge tosses verdict, $1.52 billion award in Microsoft MP3 patent case". arstechnica. Archived from the original on August 29, 2007. Retrieved August 7, 2007.

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

"Microsoft faces $1.5bn MP3 payout". BBC News. February 22, 2007. Retrieved April 23, 2010.

bloomberg.com

Decker, Susan (September 11, 2009). "Microsoft Wins Reversal of $358 Million Alcatel Award". Bloomberg News. Retrieved September 12, 2009.
"Microsoft Didn't Violate Alcatel Patent, Jury Says (Update2)". Bloomberg. June 4, 2008.

cnet.com

news.cnet.com

Microsoft hit with $1.5 billion patent verdict CNET News.com
Broache, Anne (March 2, 2007). "Microsoft wins in second Alcatel-Lucent patent suit". CNET. Retrieved March 4, 2007.

cnet.com

"Go files antitrust suit against Microsoft". cnet.com. July 1, 2005.

dspdesignline.com

ITC to rule on Microsoft, Alcatel-Lucent IPR spat DSP DesignLine

groklaw.net

"A New Antitrust Lawsuit - Go Corp. v. Microsoft".

informationweek.com

Microsoft's Court Battles With Alcatel-Lucent Far From Over InformationWeek

leagle.com

Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Gateway, Inc., 580 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2009).
Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Gateway, Inc., 509 F. Supp. 2d 912 (S.D. Cal. 2007).
Lucent Techs., Inc. v. Gateway, Inc., 543 F.3d 710 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

nytimes.com

"Microsoft and Alcatel-Lucent settle most patent suits". The New York Times. November 16, 2008.

patents.google.com

pcworld.com

Montalbano, Elizabeth (March 3, 2007). "One Patent Claim Against Microsoft Dropped". Retrieved March 4, 2007.

physorg.com

"Microsoft ordered to pay Alcatel-Lucent $1.52B for infringement". Physorg.com. February 23, 2007. Archived from the original on February 25, 2007. Retrieved February 24, 2007.

reuters.com

Jury rules for Alcatel in Microsoft patent case Reuters

uk.reuters.com

Wakabayashi, Daisuke (June 20, 2008). "U.S. judge upholds Alcatel award in Microsoft case". Reuters.

rutgers.edu

caip.rutgers.edu

"James Johnson". rutgers.edu. Archived from the original on June 13, 2007. Retrieved September 26, 2007.

usatoday.com

Mintz, Jessica (April 4, 2008). "Microsoft to Appeal $367M Patent Ruling". The Associated Press. Retrieved September 4, 2008. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

web.archive.org

"Microsoft ordered to pay Alcatel-Lucent $1.52B for infringement". Physorg.com. February 23, 2007. Archived from the original on February 25, 2007. Retrieved February 24, 2007.
"James Johnson". rutgers.edu. Archived from the original on June 13, 2007. Retrieved September 26, 2007.
Bangeman, Eric (August 6, 2007). "Judge tosses verdict, $1.52 billion award in Microsoft MP3 patent case". arstechnica. Archived from the original on August 29, 2007. Retrieved August 7, 2007.