Amicus curiae (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Amicus curiae" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

4web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

2,540^th place

1,620^th place

2^nd place

2^nd place

1harvardcrcl.org

low place

low place

low place

low place

1,747^th place

1,277^th place

1akjournals.com

low place

low place

26^th place

20^th place

8,298^th place

5,307^th place

102^nd place

76^th place

182^nd place

981^st place

low place

9,301^st place

1constitucional.com.ar

low place

low place

14^th place

14^th place

1chicagoguncase.com

low place

low place

179^th place

183^rd place

1supremecourt.gov

3,811^th place

2,160^th place

1stanfordlawreview.org

low place

low place

5^th place

5^th place

3,596^th place

2,126^th place

6,607^th place

3,855^th place

low place

low place

1cortecostituzionale.it

low place

low place

low place

low place

akjournals.com

"Amicus Curiae: Origin, Worldwide Experience and Suggestions for East European Countries", Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies (2019).

archive.today

Gura, Alan (7 July 2009). "Thirty-four states support second amendment incorporation". ChicagoGunCase. Archived from the original on 21 July 2012. Retrieved 4 October 2009.

canlii.org

"R. v. Warren, 2022 ONSC 542". CanLII. paras. 12-16. 24 January 2022. Retrieved 28 May 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)

chicagoguncase.com

Gura, Alan (7 July 2009). "Thirty-four states support second amendment incorporation". ChicagoGunCase. Archived from the original on 21 July 2012. Retrieved 4 October 2009.

constitucional.com.ar

Domingo Rondina (16 May 2012). "Amicus Curiae Constitucional.com.ar".

cortecostituzionale.it

Corte costituzionale.

doi.org

Wiik, Astrid (26 December 2018). Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. doi:10.5771/9783845275925. hdl:20.500.12657/43984. ISBN 978-3-8452-7592-5. Retrieved 26 December 2022 – via library.oapen.org.
Bajwa, Kamran S.; Miller, Samuel E. (May 2023). "Liberalism versus Liberalism: An Analysis of Muslim-American Amicus Curiae Arguments Concerning Complicity-Based Conscience Claims". Journal of Law and Religion. 38 (2): 224–248. doi:10.1017/jlr.2023.12. ISSN 0748-0814.

gov.on.ca

attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca

"Chapter 7 – Managing the Unrepresented Accused". Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. 29 October 2015. Retrieved 11 May 2020.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Wiik, Astrid (26 December 2018). Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. doi:10.5771/9783845275925. hdl:20.500.12657/43984. ISBN 978-3-8452-7592-5. Retrieved 26 December 2022 – via library.oapen.org.

harvardcrcl.org

"The Statement of Interest as a Tool in Federal Civil Rights Enforcement" (PDF). Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review.

irwinlaw.com

"Intervener". Irwin Law. Retrieved 28 May 2024.

jstor.org

Mohan, S. Chandra (2010). "The Amicus Curiae: Friends No More?". Singapore Journal of Legal Studies: 352–374. JSTOR 24870502. Retrieved 26 December 2022 – via JSTOR.

justice.gc.ca

"Legal Representation of Children in Canada. 5. Amicus Curiae". justice.gc.ca. Department of Justice Canada. Government of Canada. 3 February 2023. Archived from the original on 24 November 2022. Retrieved 21 June 2023. In some cases, the court may appoint amicus curiae in a case that involves children, so as to help the court in determining what is in the best interests of the children.
"Testimonial Support for Vulnerable Adults (Bill C-2): Case Law Review (2009–2012). 5. Preventing Questioning by Self-represented Accused: Section 486.3". Department of Justice Canada. 18 November 2016. Retrieved 11 May 2020.

oapen.org

library.oapen.org

Wiik, Astrid (26 December 2018). Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. doi:10.5771/9783845275925. hdl:20.500.12657/43984. ISBN 978-3-8452-7592-5. Retrieved 26 December 2022 – via library.oapen.org.

rivistaaic.it

AIC.

scc-csc.ca

R v Kahsai, 2023 SCC 20.

stanford.edu

lawreview.stanford.edu

Lee, Rachel C. (April 2009). "Ex Parte Blogging: The Legal Ethics of Supreme Court Advocacy in the Internet Era" (PDF). Stanford Law Review. 61 (6): 1535–1571. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 May 2009.

stanfordlawreview.org

Goldman, Brian P. (2011). "Should the Supreme Court Stop Inviting Amici Curiae to Defend Abandoned Lower Court Decisions?" (PDF). Stanford Law Review. 63: 907–972. Retrieved 25 April 2017.

supremecourt.gov

United States Supreme Court Rule Archived 12 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine, 33

treccani.it

"Treccani - La cultura italiana | Treccani, il portale del sapere". www.treccani.it. Retrieved 26 December 2022.

umd.edu

bsos.umd.edu

Judithanne Scourfield McLauchlan (2005). Congressional Participation As Amicus Curiae Before the U.S. Supreme Court. LFB Scholarly Publishing. p. 266. ISBN 1-59332-088-4. Archived from the original on 17 May 2012.

uw.edu

digitalcommons.law.uw.edu

Anderson, Helen (1 January 2015). "Frenemies of the Court: The Many Faces of Amicus Curiae". University of Richmond Law Review. 49: 361. Retrieved 26 December 2022.

web.archive.org

"Legal Representation of Children in Canada. 5. Amicus Curiae". justice.gc.ca. Department of Justice Canada. Government of Canada. 3 February 2023. Archived from the original on 24 November 2022. Retrieved 21 June 2023. In some cases, the court may appoint amicus curiae in a case that involves children, so as to help the court in determining what is in the best interests of the children.
Judithanne Scourfield McLauchlan (2005). Congressional Participation As Amicus Curiae Before the U.S. Supreme Court. LFB Scholarly Publishing. p. 266. ISBN 1-59332-088-4. Archived from the original on 17 May 2012.
Lee, Rachel C. (April 2009). "Ex Parte Blogging: The Legal Ethics of Supreme Court Advocacy in the Internet Era" (PDF). Stanford Law Review. 61 (6): 1535–1571. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 May 2009.
United States Supreme Court Rule Archived 12 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine, 33

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Bajwa, Kamran S.; Miller, Samuel E. (May 2023). "Liberalism versus Liberalism: An Analysis of Muslim-American Amicus Curiae Arguments Concerning Complicity-Based Conscience Claims". Journal of Law and Religion. 38 (2): 224–248. doi:10.1017/jlr.2023.12. ISSN 0748-0814.