Anglo-Manipur War (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Anglo-Manipur War" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

15books.google.com

3^rd place

5archive.org

6^th place

5doi.org

2^nd place

3thegazette.co.uk

200^th place

141^st place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

2handle.net

102^nd place

76^th place

2oxforddnb.com

284^th place

187^th place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

1archivesmanipur.nic.in

low place

1inflibnet.ac.in

4,441^st place

2,938^th place

1jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

1telegraphindia.com

434^th place

254^th place

1manipuronline.com

low place

1cam.ac.uk

670^th place

480^th place

1bbc.com

20^th place

30^th place

archive.org

Majumdar, Rebellion in Manipur, 1891 (1960). Majumdar, R. C. (1960), "Rebellion in Manipur, 1891", Indian Historical Records Commission, Proceedings Volume XXXV, Part II, Manager of Publications, Government of India – via archive.org
Aitchison, Treaties (1931), pp. 134–135: "While the Manipuris called the British action 'treachery' because they interfered in the internal affairs of an independent kingdom, the latter termed the events of 1891 as 'rebellion'.". Aitchison, C. U., ed. (1931), A Collection of Treaties, Engagements and Sanads Relating to India and Neighbouring Countries, vol. XII, Calcutta: Government of India, Central Publication Branch – via archive.org
Majumdar, British Paramountcy and Indian Renaissance, Part I (2002), pp. 732–733: "[The Treaty of Yandabo] leaves vague and undefined the exact status of the Manipur State, and there is no subsequent treaty to indicate that it was a vassal State, either of Burma or of the British.". Majumdar, R. C., ed. (2002) [1963], British Paramountcy and Indian Renaissance, Part I, History and Culture of Indian People, vol. IX (4th ed.), Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan – via archive.org
Majumdar, British Paramountcy and Indian Renaissance, Part I (2002), pp. 728–729: "It was pointed out on behalf of the accused that Manipur was an independent State and the British had no right to attack the house of Tikendrajit in order to arrest him.". Majumdar, R. C., ed. (2002) [1963], British Paramountcy and Indian Renaissance, Part I, History and Culture of Indian People, vol. IX (4th ed.), Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan – via archive.org
Majumdar, British Paramountcy and Indian Renaissance, Part I (2002), pp. 728–729. Majumdar, R. C., ed. (2002) [1963], British Paramountcy and Indian Renaissance, Part I, History and Culture of Indian People, vol. IX (4th ed.), Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan – via archive.org

archivesmanipur.nic.in

"The Anglo Manipur War 1891 and its Consequences". Manipur State Archives. 19 January 2012. Retrieved 8 June 2015.

bbc.com

"Victoria Cross soldier's medals sell for £420k". BBC News. 23 June 2021. Retrieved 27 June 2021.

books.google.com

Lee-Warner, The Protected Princes of India (1894), p. 175: 'The proclamation ended thus: "The subjects of the Manipur state are enjoined to take warning by the punishments inflicted on the above-named persons found guilty of rebellion and murder".'. Lee-Warner, Sir William (1894), The Protected Princes of India, Macmillan and Company
Lee-Warner, The Protected Princes of India (1894), pp. 171–172: "Although the British connexion with the state had been established soon after the battle of Plassey, it was not until the conclusion of the Treaty of Ava in 1826 by Lord Amherst that Manipur was included in the protectorate.... British intercourse with the principality was confined to the formal admission of subordination by the rulers of Manipur, and to periodical intervention for the suppression of usurpers or for the banishment of relatives dangerous to the stability of the Maharaja's rule.". Lee-Warner, Sir William (1894), The Protected Princes of India, Macmillan and Company
Phanjoubam, Pradip (2015), The Northeast Question: Conflicts and frontiers, Routledge, pp. 3–4, ISBN 978-1-317-34004-1, After comprehensively defeating the Burmese in 1826 in Assam and Manipur, and the signing of the Treaty of Yandabo, the British annexed Assam, but allowed Manipur to remain a protectorate state.
Wahengbam, P. (2021), "Colonisation of Manipur: Cause, Process, Native Resentment and Resistance", in Maguni Charan Behera (ed.), Tribe-British Relations in India: Revisiting Text, Perspective and Approach, Springer Nature, pp. 264–265, ISBN 9789811634246, The British authorities felt that Manipur would hardly stand independently without their 'benevolent' help. Gradually, they began to take Manipur as a protectorate state.
Lokendra, N. (1998), The Unquiet Valley: Society, Economy, and Politics of Manipur (1891-1950), Mittal Publications, pp. 26–27, ISBN 978-81-7099-696-5, Legally, however, Manipur never acknowledged the suzerainty of the British Government.
Lee-Warner, The Protected Princes of India (1894), pp. 171–172. Lee-Warner, Sir William (1894), The Protected Princes of India, Macmillan and Company
Temple, The Manipur Bue-Book (1891), p. 918. Temple, Richard (June 1891), "The Manipur Blue-Book", The Contemporary Review, 59: 917–924
Temple, The Manipur Bue-Book (1891), pp. 918–919. Temple, Richard (June 1891), "The Manipur Blue-Book", The Contemporary Review, 59: 917–924
Temple, The Manipur Bue-Book (1891), p. 919: "The Regent Juberaj is to understand that if he is recognised as Maharaja this recognition is to be owing to the will of the British Government, and not to the successful rebellion of his brother the Senapati—in other words, he is to reign as the vassal of the British Paramount, and not as the puppet of his strong-minded brother the Senapati." Temple, Richard (June 1891), "The Manipur Blue-Book", The Contemporary Review, 59: 917–924
Temple, The Manipur Bue-Book (1891), pp. 919–920 (Government of India's report to the Secretary of State in London) Temple, Richard (June 1891), "The Manipur Blue-Book", The Contemporary Review, 59: 917–924
Temple, The Manipur Bue-Book (1891), p. 921. Temple, Richard (June 1891), "The Manipur Blue-Book", The Contemporary Review, 59: 917–924
Tarapot, Bleeding Manipur (2003), p. 133. Tarapot, Phanjoubam (2003), Bleeding Manipur, Har-Anand Publications, ISBN 978-81-241-0902-1
Siṃha, Niṃthaukhoṃjama Khelacandra (1983). The Battle of Khongjom. N. Khelchandra Singh.
Dena, Lal (1991). History of Modern Manipur, 1826-1949. Orbit Publishers-Distributors. p. 65.
Datta, Amaresh (1987). Encyclopaedia of Indian Literature: A-Devo. Sahitya Akademi. p. 349. ISBN 978-81-260-1803-1.

cam.ac.uk

fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk

"India General Service Medal (1854–1895), with bar for N. E. Frontier 1891, awarded to Subadar Jangbir Rana, 1892". Fitzwilliam Museum. Archived from the original on 11 June 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2015.

doi.org

Pau, Pum Khan (2012), "Tedim Road—The Strategic Road on a Frontier: A Historical Analysis", Strategic Analysis, 36 (5): 776–786, doi:10.1080/09700161.2012.712387, Manipur then became a British protectorate although final annexation was only to take place in 1891.
Reynolds, K. D. (2010). "Grimwood [née Moore; other married name Miller], Ethel Brabazon [pseud. Ethel St Clair Grimwood] (1867–1928), the heroine of Manipur". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/101006. ISBN 978-0-19-861412-8. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
Guite, One Event, Two States 2015, p. 232: "[The Chief Commissioner of Assam] argued that since the succession law of the state was settled by the GoI in the form of primogeniture it had ‘removed any check on oppression’ by the ruling class which the people had hitherto enjoyed.". Guite, Jangkhomang (2015). "One Event, Two States". Indian Historical Review. 42 (2): 226–260. doi:10.1177/0376983615597381. ISSN 0376-9836.
Prior, Katherine (2004). "Quinton, James Wallace (1834–1891), administrator in India". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/22968. ISBN 978-0-19-861412-8. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
Guite, One Event, Two States (2015), pp. 232–233. Guite, Jangkhomang (2015). "One Event, Two States". Indian Historical Review. 42 (2): 226–260. doi:10.1177/0376983615597381. ISSN 0376-9836.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Sharma, Hanjabam Shukhdeba (2010), Self-determination movement in Manipur, Tata Institute of Social Sciences/Shodhganga, Chapter 3, hdl:10603/2710
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), p. 46: "Dramatic changes in the socioeconomic realm, political policy, institutional set up and governance of the state were brought in after Manipur lost her sovereignty in the Anglo-Manipuri War of 1891. At the politico-administrative outset, a rigor of deliberations among the colonial policy makers on the political fate of the state, finally concluded to refrain from direct annexation under the British India and instead introduced the rule of British paramountcy. The period of British paramountcy in Manipur can be studied under the two inter-related phases: (a) The Rule of Superintendency 1892-1907. (b) Indirect Native Rule 1907-1947." Sudhirkumar Singh (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur. Jawaharlal Nehru University. pp. 46–49. hdl:10603/121665.

inflibnet.ac.in

shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in

Sharma, Hanjabam Shukhdeba (2010), Self-determination movement in Manipur, Tata Institute of Social Sciences/Shodhganga, Chapter 3, hdl:10603/2710

jstor.org

Mutuwa, Miranda Bembem (2018). "Colonialism and the Princely State of Manipur: Creation of Modern Urban Space in North East India". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 79: 448–456. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 26906278.

manipuronline.com

"August 13: Patriots' Day "Freedom They Lost, But Love Of Freedom They Retained"". Manipur Online. 13 August 2014. Retrieved 8 June 2015.

oxforddnb.com

Reynolds, K. D. (2010). "Grimwood [née Moore; other married name Miller], Ethel Brabazon [pseud. Ethel St Clair Grimwood] (1867–1928), the heroine of Manipur". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/101006. ISBN 978-0-19-861412-8. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
Prior, Katherine (2004). "Quinton, James Wallace (1834–1891), administrator in India". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/22968. ISBN 978-0-19-861412-8. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

telegraphindia.com

"Tourism discovers Khongjom – Ibobi wants war cemetery developed into tourist spot". Calcutta Telegraph. 13 August 2014. Archived from the original on 11 June 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2015.

thegazette.co.uk

"The London Gazette". The London Gazette (26192): 4369–4372. 14 August 1891 – via thegazette.co.uk. As Captain Drury had only 100 rifles of the 2-4th Gurkha Regiment, 50 rifles of the 12th (Burma) Madras Infantry, and 44 mounted infantry of the 12th (Burma) Madras Infantry with him, and as I did not think this force strong: enough for the purpose, I ordered two guns of No. 2 Mountain Battery and 200 rifles of the 2-4th Gurkha Regiment, the whole under the com- mand of Captain Rundall, 2-4th Gurkha Regi- ment, to reinforce Captain Drury. Captain Rundall, on arrival at the scene of action, placed his guns on a hill about 1,000 yards from the entrenchment, and commenced to shell it.
"No. 26192". The London Gazette. 14 August 1891. p. 4372.
"No. 26192". The London Gazette. 14 August 1891. p. 4370.

web.archive.org

"Tourism discovers Khongjom – Ibobi wants war cemetery developed into tourist spot". Calcutta Telegraph. 13 August 2014. Archived from the original on 11 June 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2015.
"India General Service Medal (1854–1895), with bar for N. E. Frontier 1891, awarded to Subadar Jangbir Rana, 1892". Fitzwilliam Museum. Archived from the original on 11 June 2015. Retrieved 8 June 2015.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Mutuwa, Miranda Bembem (2018). "Colonialism and the Princely State of Manipur: Creation of Modern Urban Space in North East India". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 79: 448–456. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 26906278.
Guite, One Event, Two States 2015, p. 232: "[The Chief Commissioner of Assam] argued that since the succession law of the state was settled by the GoI in the form of primogeniture it had ‘removed any check on oppression’ by the ruling class which the people had hitherto enjoyed.". Guite, Jangkhomang (2015). "One Event, Two States". Indian Historical Review. 42 (2): 226–260. doi:10.1177/0376983615597381. ISSN 0376-9836.
Guite, One Event, Two States (2015), pp. 232–233. Guite, Jangkhomang (2015). "One Event, Two States". Indian Historical Review. 42 (2): 226–260. doi:10.1177/0376983615597381. ISSN 0376-9836.