Animal language (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Animal language" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
4th place
4th place
11th place
8th place
1st place
1st place
5th place
5th place
18th place
17th place
2,814th place
6,533rd place
344th place
296th place
7th place
7th place
32nd place
21st place
low place
low place
207th place
136th place
102nd place
76th place
503rd place
364th place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
234th place
397th place
818th place
524th place
1,160th place
737th place
low place
low place
108th place
80th place
120th place
125th place
6,042nd place
9,882nd place
9,029th place
6,022nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,619th place
2,621st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
237th place
170th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,623rd place
951st place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,786th place
1,096th place

animalstudiesrepository.org

archive.org

books.google.com

cbsnews.com

cell.com

chomsky.info

  • Hauser, Marc D.; Chomsky, Noam; Fitch, W. Tecumseh (22 November 2002). "The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?" (PDF). Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science. pp. 1569–1579. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 December 2013. Retrieved 28 March 2014. We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB) and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an infinite range of expressions from a finite set of elements. We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, hence comparative studies might look for evidence of such computations outside of the domain of communication (for example, number, navigation, and social relations).

cobras.org

  • Cobra Master (2003-12-12). "Introduction". Cobras.org. Retrieved 2013-05-19.

doi.org

dolphins.org

ebscohost.com

connection.ebscohost.com

elephantlisteningproject.org

ghostarchive.org

  • Shah, Sonia (20 September 2023). "The Animals Are Talking. What Does It Mean? – Language was long understood as a human-only affair. New research suggests that isn't so. + comment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 21 September 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2023.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

ird.fr

editions.ird.fr

nationalgeographic.com

animals.nationalgeographic.com

kids.nationalgeographic.com

nationalpost.com

news.nationalpost.com

nature.com

nau.edu

jan.ucc.nau.edu

onr.navy.mil

nerdist.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com

  • Shah, Sonia (20 September 2023). "The Animals Are Talking. What Does It Mean? – Language was long understood as a human-only affair. New research suggests that isn't so. + comment". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 21 September 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2023.

pinnipedlab.org

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

researchgate.net

science.org

seaworld.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

smithsonianmag.com

teachersdomain.org

thecephalopodpage.org

ucsc.edu

pinnipedlab.ucsc.edu

ulrikegriebel.com

web.archive.org

wilddolphinproject.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

ypte.org.uk