Antiochus X Eusebes (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Antiochus X Eusebes" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
5th place
5th place
3rd place
3rd place
121st place
142nd place
6th place
6th place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
358th place
433rd place

academia.edu

archive.org

books.google.com

doi.org

instonebrewer.com

iranicaonline.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

wikipedia.org

cs.wikipedia.org

  • The Codex Leidensis (Lugdunensis) manuscript have Γαλιχηνών (which was rendered as Gileadites by the seventeenth century historian William Whiston in his English translation of the work of Josephus) as the name of Laodice's people.[30][22] The name from the manuscript is obviously damaged and altered; von Gutschmid identified the Laodice mentioned by Josephus with the queen of Commagene and corrected Gilead to Kαλλινιχηνών (the people of Callinicos, i.e. modern Raqqa).[84][83] Kuhn, citing the archaeologist Otto Puchstein's rejection of von Gutschmid's identification, questioned von Gutschmid's reading of Kαλλινιχηνών, and noted that the name came to designate Raqqa at a much later date than the period of Antiochus X.[85] The historian Josef Dobiáš [cs] noted that regardless of when Callinicos started to be applied to Raqqa, it is doubtful that the city belonged to Commagene at all.[86]

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org