Apocrypha controversy (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Apocrypha controversy" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

2books.google.com

3^rd place

3^rd place

6^th place

6^th place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1^st place

1commontexts.org

low place

low place

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

Daniel Daniell (2003). The Bible in English. Yale University Press. p. 187. ISBN 0-300-09930-4.
Anderson, Charles R. (2003). Puzzles and Essays from "The Exchange": Tricky Reference Questions. Psychology Press. p. 123. ISBN 9780789017628. Paper and printing were expensive and early publishers were able to hold down costs by eliminating the Apocrypha once it was deemed secondary material.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

David W. Bebbington (9 March 2004). Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. Routledge. p. 87. ISBN 978-1-134-84767-9.
Leslie Howsam (8 August 2002). Cheap Bibles: Nineteenth-Century Publishing and the British and Foreign Bible Society. Cambridge University Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-521-52212-0.

commontexts.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

"The Revised Common Lectionary" (PDF). Consultation on Common Texts. 1992. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 19 August 2015. In all places where a reading from the deuterocanonical books (The Apocrypha) is listed, an alternate reading from the canonical Scriptures has also been provided.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

"The Revised Common Lectionary" (PDF). Consultation on Common Texts. 1992. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 July 2015. Retrieved 19 August 2015. In all places where a reading from the deuterocanonical books (The Apocrypha) is listed, an alternate reading from the canonical Scriptures has also been provided.