Régine Chambert "Vergil's Epicureanism in his early poems" in "Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans" 2003: "Vergil's authorship of at least some of the poems in the Appendix is nowadays no longer contested. This is especially true of the Culex ... and also of a collection of short epigrams called the Catalepton."
Gudeman 1899, p. 1. Gudeman, Alfred (1899). "Pseudo-Vergiliana". Latin Literature of the Empire. Vol. II: Poetry. New York and London: Harper & Brothers. pp. 1–32.
Glenn Most "The 'Virgilian Culex'" in "Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble", 1987
doi.org
Bramble 1982, p. 471. Bramble, J. C. (1982). "The Age of Augustus: Minor figures". Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press. pp. 467–494. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521210430.024.
Bramble 1982, p. 469. Bramble, J. C. (1982). "The Age of Augustus: Minor figures". Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press. pp. 467–494. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521210430.024.
Bramble 1982, pp. 469–470. Bramble, J. C. (1982). "The Age of Augustus: Minor figures". Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press. pp. 467–494. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521210430.024.
Bramble 1982, p. 470. Bramble, J. C. (1982). "The Age of Augustus: Minor figures". Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. 2: Latin Literature. Cambridge University Press. pp. 467–494. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521210430.024.
jstor.org
Fairclough 1922, p. 5. Fairclough, H. R. (1922). "The Poems of the Appendix Vergiliana". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 53: 5–34. JSTOR282854.
Rand 1919, pp. 107–8. Rand, E. K. (1919). "Young Virgil's Poetry". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 30: 103–185. JSTOR310615.
Fairclough 1922, p. 6. Fairclough, H. R. (1922). "The Poems of the Appendix Vergiliana". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 53: 5–34. JSTOR282854.
Barrett 1970, p. 348. Barrett, A. A. (April–June 1970). "The Authorship of the Culex: An Evaluation of the Evidence". Latomus. 29 (2): 348–362. JSTOR41527664.
Rand 1919, p. 111. Rand, E. K. (1919). "Young Virgil's Poetry". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 30: 103–185. JSTOR310615.
Barrett 1970, p. 349. Barrett, A. A. (April–June 1970). "The Authorship of the Culex: An Evaluation of the Evidence". Latomus. 29 (2): 348–362. JSTOR41527664.
St. Louis, Lisa. "Laying the Foundation for a New Work on the Pseudo-Virgilian Culex" Comparative Literature and Culture 8.1 (2006):"In my view, it seems likely that Virgil did not write the Culex which has come down to us, and, in fact, never wrote a Culex at all. Most believes that the forger 'knew that Virgil had written the Eclogues, the Georgics, and the Aeneid, in that order and nothing else, and was making reference to that fact in the structure of his poem.' According to Most, if one defends Virgilian authorship of the Culex, then one is making the ludicrous claim that 'Virgil ... as a young man unknowingly anticipated his whole future career' (208-09). It is impossible to be certain when the poem was written, but one can safely rule out the lifetimes of Virgil, his executors, and Augustus. That puts us at least in the reign of Tiberius (began A.D. 14) on the early end of the scale."
F. Moya del Baño (1984), "Virgilio y la Appendix Vergiliana" in Simposio virgiliano commemorativo del bimilenario de la muerte de Virgilio (Murcia), 59-99, concerning authorship: "Hay un tercer grupo que adopta una postura intermedia, aceptan unas y rechazan otras", eng.:"There is a third group of scholars that adopt an intermediate position, accepting some and rejecting others".
