Arch Linux (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Arch Linux" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
9,746th place
9,677th place
8,627th place
low place
low place
4,423rd place
2,925th place
low place
low place
4,683rd place
3,096th place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,246th place
5,418th place
1,592nd place
1,119th place
low place
low place
1,317th place
873rd place
1,521st place
944th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,911th place
3,889th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,475th place
1,188th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
786th place
558th place
1,499th place
989th place
low place
low place
4,558th place
3,044th place
9th place
13th place
32nd place
21st place

9to5linux.com

allanmcrae.com

archhurd.org

archive.today

archlinux.org

archlinux.org

archlinux32.org

archlinuxarm.org

archlinuxpower.org

arizona.edu

cs.arizona.edu

distrowatch.com

dvd-guides.com

felixc.at

archriscv.felixc.at

ghostarchive.org

  • "Let's Talk To Linux Kernel Developer Greg Kroah-Hartman - Open Source Summit, 2019". YouTube. 10 September 2019. Archived from the original on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 17 September 2019. [Arch developers'] idea of a constantly rolling, forward-moving system is the way to go. It's neutral, it's community-based, it has everything I need. It works really really well [...] Their Wiki is amazing. The documentation -- it's like one of the best resources out there these days. If you look up any userspace program and how to configure it and use it. Actually, the systemd Arch Wiki pages are one of the most amazing resources out there. [...] One of the main policies of Arch, or philosophies, is you stay as close to the upstream as possible. And as a developer, I want that. They're really good in feedback to the community. Because I want that testing -- I want to make sure that things are fixed. And if it is broken, I learn about it quickly and I fix it and push the stuff out. So that's actually a really good feedback loop.

gnu.org

gsmarena.com

hardware.no

kernel.org

git.kernel.org

linode.com

library.linode.com

linuxdistroreview.com

  • Bo Milanovich (8 March 2011). "Arch Linux". linuxdistroreview.com. Archived from the original on 21 February 2012. Retrieved 30 September 2011.

linuxjournal.com

lwn.net

makeuseof.com

msys2.org

osdir.com

osnews.com

ostatic.com

  • Linton, Susan (17 July 2015). "Debian Project Lead: Snappy and Mir Bad Ideas". OStatic. Archived from the original on 4 February 2017. Retrieved 4 February 2017. One of the first questions wondered if McGovern was jealous of anything from any other distro. To that he answered Arch's wiki calling it "an absolutely amazing resource" that he himself uses.

pcworld.com

phoronix.com

pkgbuild.com

techradar.com

tuxmachines.org

web.archive.org

youtube.com

  • "Let's Talk To Linux Kernel Developer Greg Kroah-Hartman - Open Source Summit, 2019". YouTube. 10 September 2019. Archived from the original on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 17 September 2019. [Arch developers'] idea of a constantly rolling, forward-moving system is the way to go. It's neutral, it's community-based, it has everything I need. It works really really well [...] Their Wiki is amazing. The documentation -- it's like one of the best resources out there these days. If you look up any userspace program and how to configure it and use it. Actually, the systemd Arch Wiki pages are one of the most amazing resources out there. [...] One of the main policies of Arch, or philosophies, is you stay as close to the upstream as possible. And as a developer, I want that. They're really good in feedback to the community. Because I want that testing -- I want to make sure that things are fixed. And if it is broken, I learn about it quickly and I fix it and push the stuff out. So that's actually a really good feedback loop.

zdnet.com