Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "B. Traven" in English language version.
Guthke's statements about B. Traven's origins and his attempts to cast doubt on Will Wyatt's research findings are not convincing. It is not the case that Ret Marut only claimed to be Otto Feige during the 1924 interrogation by London police. Rather, he admitted (confessed) that his real name was Hermann Otto Albert Max Feige and that he was born in 1882 in Schwiebus as the son of a potter and a factory worker (millhand). He was also able to convince the police that he was well acquainted with conditions in Schwiebus. ... Through Wyatt's research, all these statements were documentarily verified. ... Guthke's argument that Ret Marut knew Otto Feige and Schwiebus and used him as a front is untenable given Marut's detailed statements. If the identity of B. Traven with Ret Marut is admitted, then that of Ret Marut and Otto Feige is documentarily proven.
Guthke's statements about B. Traven's origins and his attempts to cast doubt on Will Wyatt's research findings are not convincing. It is not the case that Ret Marut only claimed to be Otto Feige during the 1924 interrogation by London police. Rather, he admitted (confessed) that his real name was Hermann Otto Albert Max Feige and that he was born in 1882 in Schwiebus as the son of a potter and a factory worker (millhand). He was also able to convince the police that he was well acquainted with conditions in Schwiebus. ... Through Wyatt's research, all these statements were documentarily verified. ... Guthke's argument that Ret Marut knew Otto Feige and Schwiebus and used him as a front is untenable given Marut's detailed statements. If the identity of B. Traven with Ret Marut is admitted, then that of Ret Marut and Otto Feige is documentarily proven.