Noe, pp. 301–305; McDonough, pp. 285–286; Cameron, pp. 184–86. Noe, p. 302, cites the 65.3% casualty rate of the 22nd Indiana as the highest at the battle. A National Park Service regimental websiteArchived February 22, 2014, at the Wayback Machine states the 33rd Alabama sustained an even higher casualty rate, 82% of 500 present. However, Noe, p. 372, lists the 33rd Alabama at 43% (initial strength of 380, 14 killed, 153 wounded). Hafendorfer, p. 363, states that the 82% figure cited in the Alabama War Records is a "little high", and exact figures for that brigade are not available.
Noe, pp. 301–305; McDonough, pp. 285–286; Cameron, pp. 184–86. Noe, p. 302, cites the 65.3% casualty rate of the 22nd Indiana as the highest at the battle. A National Park Service regimental websiteArchived February 22, 2014, at the Wayback Machine states the 33rd Alabama sustained an even higher casualty rate, 82% of 500 present. However, Noe, p. 372, lists the 33rd Alabama at 43% (initial strength of 380, 14 killed, 153 wounded). Hafendorfer, p. 363, states that the 82% figure cited in the Alabama War Records is a "little high", and exact figures for that brigade are not available.
