Bernoulli number (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Bernoulli number" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
69th place
59th place
26th place
20th place
11th place
8th place
18th place
17th place
5th place
5th place
1,923rd place
1,068th place
451st place
277th place
513th place
537th place
6th place
6th place
1st place
1st place
5,218th place
9,258th place
549th place
491st place
low place
low place
3rd place
3rd place
8,613th place
6,778th place
179th place
183rd place
low place
low place
621st place
380th place
332nd place
246th place
low place
low place
2,529th place
3,277th place
5,626th place
8,880th place
low place
low place
3,707th place
2,409th place

ams.org

mathscinet.ams.org

archive.org

  • Translation of the text: " ... And if [one were] to proceed onward step by step to higher powers, one may furnish, with little difficulty, the following list:
    Sums of powers


    Indeed [if] one will have examined diligently the law of arithmetic progression there, one will also be able to continue the same without these circuitous computations: For [if] is taken as the exponent of any power, the sum of all is produced or

    and so forth, the exponent of its power continually diminishing by 2 until it arrives at or . The capital letters etc. denote in order the coefficients of the last terms for , etc. namely
    ."
    [Note: The text of the illustration contains some typos: ensperexit should read inspexerit, ambabimus should read ambagibus, quosque should read quousque, and in Bernoulli's original text Sumtâ should read Sumptâ or Sumptam.]
    • Smith, David Eugene (1929), "Jacques (I) Bernoulli: On the 'Bernoulli Numbers'", A Source Book in Mathematics, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., pp. 85–90

arxiv.org

bernoulli.org

books.google.com

cornell.edu

digital.library.cornell.edu

digizeitschriften.de

doi.org

eudml.org

fourmilab.ch

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

jstor.org

luschny.de

maecla.it

nodak.edu

genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu

projecteuclid.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu

www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu

  • Donald Knuth (2022), Recent News (2022): Concrete Mathematics and Bernoulli.

    But last year I took a close look at Peter Luschny's Bernoulli manifesto, where he gives more than a dozen good reasons why the value of $B_1$ should really be plus one-half. He explains that some mathematicians of the early 20th century had unilaterally changed the conventions, because some of their formulas came out a bit nicer when the negative value was used. It was their well-intentioned but ultimately poor choice that had led to what I'd been taught in the 1950s. […] By now, hundreds of books that use the “minus-one-half” convention have unfortunately been written. Even worse, all the major software systems for symbolic mathematics have that 20th-century aberration deeply embedded. Yet Luschny convinced me that we have all been wrong, and that it's high time to change back to the correct definition before the situation gets even worse.

tripod.com

jeff560.tripod.com

univie.ac.at

mat.univie.ac.at

web.archive.org

wolfram.com

mathworld.wolfram.com

blog.wolfram.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

zbmath.org

zenodo.org