Bharati Harish Dangre (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Bharati Harish Dangre" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

3thehindu.com

52^nd place

35^th place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2hindustantimes.com

71^st place

52^nd place

2indianexpress.com

60^th place

43^rd place

2outlookindia.com

526^th place

312^th place

1bombayhighcourt.nic.in

low place

1ndtv.com

138^th place

95^th place

1thewire.in

1,507^th place

818^th place

1thequint.com

1,282^nd place

687^th place

1lokmat.com

4,214^th place

2,894^th place

1firstpost.com

283^rd place

179^th place

1dnaindia.com

250^th place

153^rd place

1indiatimes.com

17^th place

15^th place

1financialexpress.com

798^th place

457^th place

bombayhighcourt.nic.in

"JUSTICE SMT. BHARATI DANGRE". Bombay High Court. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020.

dnaindia.com

Plumber, Mustafa (10 February 2018). "Bombay High Court tells Centre and Maha government to set up grievance mechanism for easy filing of GST tax". DNA India. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

financialexpress.com

"Tax department to set up GST grievance redressal system". The Financial Express. 21 February 2018. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

firstpost.com

"Bombay High Court says GST not tax-friendly, tells government to put requisite mechanism in place". Firstpost. 12 February 2018. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

hindustantimes.com

"Bombay high court upholds Maratha quota, caps it at 13%". Hindustan Times. 27 June 2019. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
"Pocso Act applies only when a child is harassed with sexual intent: Bombay HC". Hindustan Times. 12 September 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

indianexpress.com

"If accused charged under POCSO, SC/ST Act, offences can be tried only by special POCSO court: Bombay HC". The Indian Express. 7 July 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
"Holding hand of minor to express love, inadvertent physical touch without sexual intent not assault under POCSO: HC". The Indian Express. 27 December 2020. Retrieved 28 December 2020.

indiatimes.com

economictimes.indiatimes.com

Sikarwar, Deepshikha. "GST regime not user-friendly, says Bombay High Court". The Economic Times. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

lokmat.com

english.lokmat.com

author/lokmat-english-desk (1 October 2020). "Maratha morcha workers issue ultimatum to govt, call for Maharashtra Bandh on Oct 10 | english.lokmat.com". Lokmat English. Retrieved 6 October 2020. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

ndtv.com

"Bombay High Court Confirms Maratha Quota, But Says 16% Not Justifiable". NDTV.com. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

outlookindia.com

PTI (6 July 2020). "POCSO Act has overriding effect on any other law: Bombay HC". Outlook India. Archived from the original on 9 October 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
PTI (12 February 2018). "GST not tax-friendly, put requisite mechanism in place: HC". Outlook India. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

thehindu.com

Saigal, Sonam (27 June 2019). "Bombay High Court upholds reservation for Maratha community". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
Correspondent, Legal (11 September 2020). "Relaxation of 50% cap on reservation for Marathas in Maharashtra unwarranted, rules SC". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 6 October 2020. {{cite news}}: |last= has generic name (help)
"GST not a tax-friendly regime: HC". The Hindu. 10 February 2018. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

thequint.com

"Maratha Quota: Maha Govt Files Plea in SC for Review of Stay Order". TheQuint. 21 September 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

thewire.in

"Why the Bombay HC Judgment on Maratha Reservation Is Inherently Flawed". The Wire. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

web.archive.org

"JUSTICE SMT. BHARATI DANGRE". Bombay High Court. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020.
PTI (6 July 2020). "POCSO Act has overriding effect on any other law: Bombay HC". Outlook India. Archived from the original on 9 October 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2020.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Saigal, Sonam (27 June 2019). "Bombay High Court upholds reservation for Maratha community". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 6 October 2020.
Correspondent, Legal (11 September 2020). "Relaxation of 50% cap on reservation for Marathas in Maharashtra unwarranted, rules SC". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 6 October 2020. {{cite news}}: |last= has generic name (help)
"GST not a tax-friendly regime: HC". The Hindu. 10 February 2018. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 6 October 2020.