Bumper (car) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Bumper (car)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
4,548th place
2,898th place
low place
low place
7,538th place
4,859th place
1,690th place
998th place
2,442nd place
2,402nd place
2nd place
2nd place
7th place
7th place
low place
low place
3,589th place
2,085th place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
2,782nd place
1,794th place
low place
low place
2,398th place
1,502nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,359th place
4,750th place
low place
low place
2,254th place
1,243rd place
2,283rd place
1,373rd place
4,774th place
2,901st place
low place
6,283rd place
1,734th place
1,312th place
507th place
429th place
68th place
117th place
low place
low place
2,186th place
1,287th place
8,729th place
5,008th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
22nd place
19th place
low place
low place
1,712th place
1,063rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place

autoevolution.com

autonews.com

autos.ca

autosafetyexpert.com

boitierrouge.com

  • Clément-Collin, Paul (16 May 2015). "Citroën SM: la chute de "Sa Majesté"" [Citroën SM: "Her Majesty's" fall] (in French). Boitier Rouge. Archived from the original on 19 August 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2022. But in 1974, everything changed: new American regulations imposed new bumpers, and made it almost impossible to market a car with variable suspension height without heavy and very expensive technical modifications. Citroën had to throw in the towel in the United States after hoping in vain for a waiver.

books.google.com

  • Helps, Ian G. (2001). Plastics in European cars, 2000 - 2008. Shawbury RAPRA Technology. p. 99. ISBN 9781859572344. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  • "Bumper Development". Automobile Trade Journal. 29 (6): 301. 1 December 1924. Retrieved 20 July 2018.
  • "The 1910 Harroun Bumper". Cycle and Automobile Trade Journal, Volume 14. 1909. p. 142. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
  • Genat, Robert (2005). Challenger And 'Cuda: Mopar's E-Body Muscle Cars. MBI Publishing. p. 58. ISBN 9780760318645. Retrieved 20 July 2018.
  • Maxwell, James (31 March 1994). Plastics in the Automotive Industry. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. p. 107. ISBN 9781845698645. Retrieved 21 June 2016.
  • Elmarakbi, Ahmed (2014). Advanced composite materials for automotive applications: structural integrity and crashworthiness. Wiley. p. 130. ISBN 9781118535271. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  • Lamm, Michael (October 1972). "AMC: Hornet hatchback leads the lineup". Popular Mechanics. 138 (4): 118–202. Retrieved 12 June 2022 – via Google Bookes.
  • Norbye, Jan P. (October 1973). "New bumpers have uniform height, take angle impacts". Popular Science. 203 (4): 90–91. Retrieved 12 June 2022 – via Google Books.
  • Cranswick, Marc (2011). The Cars of American Motors: An Illustrated History. McFarland. p. 209. ISBN 9780786446728. Retrieved 12 June 2022 – via Google Books.
  • Insurance Facts. Insurance Information Institute. 1980. p. 61. Retrieved 6 January 2014.
  • "Cars you can't buy here". Popular Mechanics. September 1984. p. 61. Retrieved 12 April 2017.

canada.ca

tc.canada.ca

canadagazette.gc.ca

  • Canada Gazette Part I (PDF), vol. 142, 22 March 2008, p. 823, retrieved 12 July 2020, The intention of the current U.S. bumper standard is to reduce damage to the bumper system and thus provide American consumers with a lower bumper damage replacement and repair cost, while also maintaining the integrity of the safety systems.

canadasafetycouncil.org

core.ac.uk

  • Anderson, Robert William Gerard; van den Berg, Andrew Leo; Ponte, Giulio; Streeter, Luke Daniel; McLean, Jack (July 2006). Performance of bull bars in pedestrian impact tests (PDF). Centre for Automotive Safety Research, The University of Adelaide (Report). Australia. Retrieved 5 April 2024.

dft.gov.uk

rmd.dft.gov.uk

doi.org

dot.gov

nhtsa.dot.gov

crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov

europa.eu

eur-lex.europa.eu

everything2.com

guidelamp.net

hagerty.com

hemmings.com

heraldpalladium.com

iihs.org

ijieee.org.in

pep.ijieee.org.in

latimes.com

metalconsult.com

motorverso.com

newsok.com

nhtsa.gov

nytimes.com

plastics-car.com

reason.com

roadandtrack.com

sae.org

papers.sae.org

scienceservingsociety.com

  • Evans, Leonard (2004). "11 Occupant protection". scienceservingsociety.com. Retrieved 20 July 2018. The reduction in speed divided by the time over which it takes place defines deceleration. Injury-producing forces are proportional to the deceleration experienced by the occupant. Occupant protection aims at reducing these forces by spreading the occupant's changes in speed over longer times. The theoretical best protection would be for the occupant to slow down from the initial vehicle speed to zero speed at a constant deceleration using the entire distance between the occupant's body and the vehicle's point of impact. In the previous example of an initial speed of 50 km/h, and assuming the driver is seated 2.5 m behind the front bumper, the resulting average deceleration would be 4 G, uncomfortable but unlikely to produce even a minor injury.

smartmotorist.com

tandfonline.com

truckinginfo.com

underridenetwork.org

unece.org

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org